I totally agree, and I'm not trying to say they don't have a responsibility to hold up their end of the deal. I mean, they have a moral obligation that goes
beyond the law in this case, to provide a withdrawal. And I'm not saying players are committing crimes here. All I'm sayin is, a snake is a snake. Depositing with a casino that's already breaking the law of the land is asking for trouble. It's basically like mailing $100 to a drug dealer and hoping they mail back weed. Shockingly enough, if you look at what's been going on with Silk Road, they actually
do mail back weed enough of the time for Congress to start investigating it. But it wouldn't be too surprising if they just ran off with your money because hey, they're drug dealers.
I shouldn't have turned this into a political rant, that's just my frustration with the system, 'cause the system's corrupt. But we don't live in a free-and-open market where the best casino with the fairest games and the best
RTP gets your business. We live in one where the best and most respectable casinos wouldn't touch the US with a ten foot pole, so what's left are the ones that were shady operators to start off with. That's all I'm really saying. And I'm not blaming the victim -- she has every right to her money if they have to deliver it to her personally. I'm agreeing with you they shouldn't be in a business where they take people's money and can't pay back.
Hell, I don't even know what I'm saying. Whole thing just makes me angry is all.
Bookmarks