Vegas Regal stopped paying 13,000 Jackpot win

[KasinoKing]

My mind is in total denial, am thinking things like maybe their software crashed making it so everyone kept winning, leaving them with a huge bill to pay. silly I know

It's not THAT silly; Since I started promoting them in Jan'09 all the players who signed-up via my sites have collectively WON over $9,000 from the casino. In addition to that, they have paid me over $3,000 in commission, so in total my players have cost them well over $12,000!
If that small sample was repeated across the board, the casino would be in deep do-do's!

[/derail - sorry!]
KK

[Casinomeister]

It's not THAT silly; Since I started promoting them in Jan'09 all the players who signed-up via my sites have collectively WON over $9,000 from the casino. In addition to that, they have paid me over $3,000 in commission, so in total my players have cost them well over $12,000!
If that small sample was repeated across the board, the casino would be in deep do-do's!

[/derail - sorry!]
KK

But why are you (or anybody for that matter) promoting these casinos?:
http://www.casinomeister.com/rogue/n...al_casinos.php

They've been in the pit for months - yet there seems to be a lot of people who ignore this.

Why have a rogue pit or "not recommended" section anyway? I know it needs some serious updating, but it's still pretty legit.

[ergopro]

Imho, they took care of their players earlier.
After what they've done recently, not. My guess as well is cause of moneyflow issues. But they were a rare asset called decent Rival white label
Regal wasn't nearly as bad as most other Rivals.
With recent irregular play / bonus abuse sh*t...they do deserve to be in pit.

[lillch]

I contacted some portals and they would not reply to them as well although they were promoters of Vegas Regal and other RIvals, if anybody know of somebody who can help or an affiliate please advice or PM thanks!

[vinylweatherman]

But why are you (or anybody for that matter) promoting these casinos?:
http://www.casinomeister.com/rogue/n...al_casinos.php

They've been in the pit for months - yet there seems to be a lot of people who ignore this.

Why have a rogue pit or "not recommended" section anyway? I know it needs some serious updating, but it's still pretty legit.

They were only in "not recommended" rather than in the main pit. This complaint seems different however, as it is not about "bonus abuse", but the cessation of payments from a progressive win that they (the casino) have already judged as legit and within the terms due to them having begun payment.

This seems to suggest that they simply don't have the money to pay players any longer, and are having to attract further deposits in order to cover existing payout requests. With the loss of the US market, these deposits are no longer coming in, and the strain is beginning to show.

Until recently, the less rogue white labels were responding to those portals that continued to give them the benefit of the doubt, rather than lumping ALL white labels together. This new policy of refusing to respond to ANYONE about these complaints is a clear shift towards full blown rogue status.

Moving these white labels from "not recommended" to full membership of the rogue pit will clarify any ambiguities about whether there are some "good" ones among them. It may also bring them to the negotating table, as happened earlier when they were all lumped together as "rogue", and a few of the "better ones" decided to present an argument as to why they should be excluded. KK appears to have listened to this, and tried to distinguish between the white labels, whilst CM still treated them as one, and moving them "en masse" between the various categorisations.