Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues

Notices

Casino Complaints - Non-Bonus Issues Complaints concerning operational issues, fraud, non-payment, spammers, evil operators and players etc., are to be posted here

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #61 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 03:00 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 300 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
Wow, kind of harsh bb. FYI, I only play at a couple of trusted places and I have never, EVER been asked for documents or ID. Perhaps it's because I play regularly and have made so many deposits, I don't know. I did in fact show ID for my debit card WHEN I OPENED MY ACCOUNT!! Thanks bb for making my point that these things should be done upfront. I'm sorry you feel the need to admonish me for suggesting that there is a better way to do things. I sure hope you never post on here about how so and so casino stole my identity, because really you will have just given it to them. Not saying it would happen, but who knows?

You are right about one thing though, it is pointless to discuss as so many players will just go along with whatever ridiculous requests the casino makes of them. So if I understand you correctly, the casinos shouldn't check you out ahead of time because chances are you will lose anyway?? You would prefer to be surprised after you win and want to be paid?? Strange attitude IMO.

This insurance company type attitude of taking the premiums no questions asked but stalling and stalling when it is time to pay up gives this industry a black eye IMO. This endeavor ultimately comes down to trust between the casino and the player. The casino can screw the player by not paying and disappearing and the player can screw the casino by charging back deposits. It is a kind of detente that makes the whole document thing ridiculous.

BTW, what are these "protections" you speak of that they have in place and how does it benefit the player in anyway? Care to elaborate on that one??

There, I'm through with my retort. Talk amongst yourselves......
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pacers31 For This Useful Post:
catrina m (13th May 2008)
  #62 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 03:41 AM
bb28's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 661
WTGs: 132
WTGd at 77 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 811 Times in 385 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 4063
Rep Power: 32
bb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to bb28
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacers31 View Post
Wow, kind of harsh bb. FYI, I only play at a couple of trusted places and I have never, EVER been asked for documents or ID. Perhaps it's because I play regularly and have made so many deposits, I don't know. I did in fact show ID for my debit card WHEN I OPENED MY ACCOUNT!! Thanks bb for making my point that these things should be done upfront. I'm sorry you feel the need to admonish me for suggesting that there is a better way to do things. I sure hope you never post on here about how so and so casino stole my identity, because really you will have just given it to them. Not saying it would happen, but who knows?

Harsh??? Admonish? Pretty strong words there and no I don't think I did either one of those. I didn't say that the points I were trying to make were a better way of doing things. I simply said that is the way it is. Stealing your identity....now how does that come into this discussion?

You are right about one thing though, it is pointless to discuss as so many players will just go along with whatever ridiculous requests the casino makes of them. So if I understand you correctly, the casinos shouldn't check you out ahead of time because chances are you will lose anyway?? You would prefer to be surprised after you win and want to be paid?? Strange attitude IMO.

You are taking my words and twisting them into a statement I did NOT make. NOT nice!

This insurance company type attitude of taking the premiums no questions asked but stalling and stalling when it is time to pay up gives this industry a black eye IMO. This endeavor ultimately comes down to trust between the casino and the player. The casino can screw the player by not paying and disappearing and the player can screw the casino by charging back deposits. It is a kind of detente that makes the whole document thing ridiculous.

Your comparison of insurance ripping people off vs casino's is just muddling up the issue. If you want to talk about insurance rip off's...how about posting that in the attic? And.....for the record once again, if it's used as a delaying payment tactic for no good reason then that is just wrong and there should be plenty of outrage, but do you see a lot of posts complaining of this?

BTW, what are these "protections" you speak of that they have in place and how does it benefit the player in anyway? Care to elaborate on that one??

Any legitimate business has protections in place to prevent fraud and theft but yet fraud and theft continue to happen every day. It's just the way it is.


There, I'm through with my retort. Talk amongst yourselves......
I'll just ignore your dismissive comment.
Reply With Quote
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 04:37 AM
chuchu59's Avatar
gambling addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SOMEWHERE IN ASIA
Posts: 2,834
WTGs: 26
WTGd at 11 Times in 7 Posts
Thanks: 581
Thanked 1,373 Times in 789 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 7472
Rep Power: 68
chuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond reputechuchu59 has a reputation beyond repute
I think we have heard both sides of the story and maybe we should just leave it at that. The casinos have a right to ask for the notarized docs but they need to address 2 issues. One is that they should not be singling some players out for scrutiny just because they think there might be fraud involved. Who would like to be accused that way? So they should ask for docs accross the board. The other isse is the cost involved which may be peanuts to some and quite substantial to others. If the casinos are looking for long-term relationships they should bear at least part of the fees incurred. This is something extra on top of the usual ID/Address proof and they should address the players' concerns and make it easier for them to devour. A sweetener like a ND bonus which is equivalent to the fees should do the trick.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to chuchu59 For This Useful Post:
bb28 (13th May 2008), catrina m (13th May 2008)
  #64 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 04:46 AM
Jasminebed's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Ontario
Posts: 302
WTGs: 177
WTGd at 41 Times in 4 Posts
Thanks: 1,109
Thanked 264 Times in 145 Posts
Blog Entries: 5
Nominated 6 Times in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1410
Rep Power: 11
Jasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud ofJasminebed has much to be proud of
Quote:
Originally Posted by chuchu59 View Post
IA sweetener like a ND bonus which is equivalent to the fees should do the trick.
It was $15.00 the last time I had something notarized. 20 years ago when I was a legal secretary, we used to charge $10.00 cash for non clients, freebie for clients.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jasminebed For This Useful Post:
catrina m (13th May 2008), chuchu59 (13th May 2008)
  #65 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 05:04 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 300 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
Just as I expected bb. You rant and rave and offer no logical response. Not sure what your problem is, but you certainly have one. Regardless, not going to fly with me. So, what are the protections bb? Are you just assuming that they exist? Until you can relate something other than slamming me for attempting to bring about change through discussion, I suggest you not humiliate yourself further with your opinions presented as fact. I will not entertain further discussion on this with you as you obviously cannot intelligently defend your position. Good luck!
Reply With Quote
  #66 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 05:07 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 300 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
ChuChu, you can give them all the docs you want, but again, don't complain if something happens. Notarized documents now, whats next, a blood sample??
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pacers31 For This Useful Post:
Jasminebed (13th May 2008)
  #67 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 05:09 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 300 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
One last thing bb, just because things are the way they are for you, doesn't make it that way for all. Sorry, but your opinion is not the only one on this forum and you should conduct yourself in such a manner as to respect others.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pacers31 For This Useful Post:
catrina m (13th May 2008)
  #68 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 05:18 AM
bb28's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: US
Posts: 661
WTGs: 132
WTGd at 77 Times in 13 Posts
Thanks: 1,069
Thanked 811 Times in 385 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 4063
Rep Power: 32
bb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond reputebb28 has a reputation beyond repute
Send a message via Yahoo to bb28
Quote:
Originally Posted by pacers31 View Post
Just as I expected bb. You rant and rave and offer no logical response. Not sure what your problem is, but you certainly have one. Regardless, not going to fly with me. So, what are the protections bb? Are you just assuming that they exist? Until you can relate something other than slamming me for attempting to bring about change through discussion, I suggest you not humiliate yourself further with your opinions presented as fact. I will not entertain further discussion on this with you as you obviously cannot intelligently defend your position. Good luck!
Rant and rave uh? Slamming you? I was just stating my opinion and debating with you because I disagree with some of the points you have made.
You just took this to a personal level by being insulting and rude in what you said in the above post. So don't stress out, this is my last post in this thread.
Differences of opinion are fine and disagreement is fine but personal attacks are not.

Pacers...... I did not disrespect you nor did I stoop to personal attacks as you just did.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to bb28 For This Useful Post:
classymom (13th May 2008), jas2587 (13th May 2008), Jasminebed (13th May 2008)
  #69 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 05:21 AM
catrina m's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: US of A
Posts: 500
WTGs: 140
WTGd at 170 Times in 23 Posts
Thanks: 364
Thanked 462 Times in 182 Posts
Nominated 1 Time in 1 Post
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 2449
Rep Power: 22
catrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond reputecatrina m has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by lauriejim View Post
after giving this some thought, i have to agree that if fraud is what might be in question, whats the harm in having a few docs notarized, i mean (if )they(the casino) were stalling for time they could have one jumping thru hoops all day long, ie, this gas bill is to old, we need a newer statement ,ect and the list goes on. if i wanted my money bad enough and i knew i was in the right and had nothing to hide, give them the proof, have the docs notarized and be done with it...............just my few cents worth!! laurie
If fraud is suspected the casino has a right to protect itself but what is fraud.

I guess it's playing while underage, under an assumed name that loans you thier debit/credit card

does this give you an advantage?

Is it a drug cartel that is trying to double the ill gotten money on achilles or mega moohlah?

are they more likely to win?

Anyone that deposits is taking a risk, so what kind of fraud are they looking for?
__________________
catrina
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to catrina m For This Useful Post:
Jasminebed (13th May 2008)
  #70 (permalink)  
Old 13th May 2008, 06:11 AM
Banned Used - Repetitive violations of rule 1.1 (no flaming) and rule 1.14 (no trolls)
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Californication
Posts: 647
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 229
Thanked 300 Times in 179 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Reputation Points: 1496
Rep Power: 0
pacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud ofpacers31 has much to be proud of
Again bb, support your argument. What are these brilliant security features?? I don't give a rats ass about you disrespecting me, just present an intelligent arguement to the facts I've laid out. You speak in platitudes and ignore the logic in my statements. You are either very gullible or worse. Until you can back up your position with facts, have a coke and a smile and................

I'm sorry you don't seem to understand alliteration, as with my insurance comparison, but reread my post and if you still don't get it, let me know. By all means continue to do what the online casinos tell you. I'm sure you are just the personality type they love as a customer. BAHBAH BAHBAH BAHBAH (as in sheep)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Rival: davinci's gold hippo925 Online Casinos 19 11th March 2008 02:48 AM
Davinci's Gold/netspend markjacob Online Casinos 2 29th February 2008 06:20 AM
Processing of docs Inetbet Alitah Ask the Casinomeister 13 21st January 2008 01:42 PM
DaVinci's Gold Nice Move umberto Online Casinos 8 11th August 2006 03:06 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 01:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008
Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk