I would just like to reiterate my colleagues' statements on player security. Any reputable casino should treat their player's privately registered details as sacrosanct.
Aside from entertainment, online casino operators — moreso even than brick-and-mortar casinos — are in the business of selling trust. Without that trust, and given the quality of the competition, any online casino operator will not have players and will not be long in business. To violate that trust for the sake of whatever reward you receive for, say, selling on player email addresses, is suicidal — especially given that it's so easy for players to work out if you're doing it (many of our players, for example, use lifechooser's method when registering their email addresses), and disseminate that information! (Props to the Meister for this forum!)
As I assume is the case at all eCogra-certified casinos, our player banking details are available only to security-reviewed staff members, and no-one can access player passwords. All player private details are stored on heavily secured servers and all banking transactions are encrypted via SSL.
As bellerock has stated, the biggest risk operators face is from dishonest employees, but a reputable operator should be making every effort to ensure that this risk is reduced: through restricting data each employee has access to, thorough audit trails for every employee action, and employing standard IT security best practises.
I would hope that any casino that has been in operation for a reasonable amount of time, is answerable to their licensor and any third-party review organisation (like eCogra), and operates trusted software (such as, plug plug, Microgaming), would be able to be trusted by players; and for those that can't be, there are sites like Casinomeister that can inform players, or allow players to inform each other, to keep away.
And, of course, it goes without saying that all casinos in the Casino Action group make every effort to ensure that all player data is kept secure.
(Thanks for the heads up, Casinomeister!)
Yep, this is correct. Compromising traffic across the internet is (thankfully) not as easy as installing a packet monitor on your own PC. Doing so will allow you (or somebody else) to monitor the data coming to and leaving your PC, but to monitor traffic on another network, you need to compromise part of that network.
Cheers,
Andrew @ Casino Action




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
.
Reply With Quote



Bookmarks