Redflush not paying me my winnings details inside

[raul1]

Redflush not paying. They claim I play against their terms and condition.

I checked their terms before I played all I did was not anything even close to bonus abuse as they claim.

I played Blackjack Flat bet more than 1000 hands if I remember well, never changed the bet.

Redflush refuse to pay more than 1700 USD.

They changed their website recently and they also changed a small part of their terms.

The max bet was reduced from 30% to 25%.

I told live chat , whats going on, how can you apply new rule on me, they said we have another term, that the casino may apply new terms whenever we want.

I asked for a script of the live chat to my EMail, they refused, so sorry I can´t show you in their words what they said, if they gave me the script I would show their words

[ksech]

Unfortunately, most casinos DO have this in their terms and conditions and they will also state that it is up to the player to periodically check for these updates.

This is the first line in their T&Cs...
1. 1.The Player becomes party to and agrees to abide by all of the rules, terms and conditions specified by the casino, including any revisions that may take place periodically. The player specifically agrees to abide by the rules of eligibility as set out above.

Have you tried to contact their rep and "talk" things out first? It may be a simple miscommunication. Next, if you have and things just aren't working out, you MAY have grounds for a PAB (pitch-A-bitch). Make sure you read all the rules for the PAB if you decide to go that route. Either way, good luck in your endeavors.

[raul1]

Thanks for the advice, I sent a message to REDFLUSH at Casinomeister, hope he can help

[GrandMaster]

Unfortunately, most casinos DO have this in their terms and conditions and they will also state that it is up to the player to periodically check for these updates.

This is the first line in their T&Cs...
1. 1.The Player becomes party to and agrees to abide by all of the rules, terms and conditions specified by the casino, including any revisions that may take place periodically. The player specifically agrees to abide by the rules of eligibility as set out above.

However, changing the T&C applicable to a bonus while the player is trying to satisfy the WR is very rogue behaviour.

[chuchu59]

Timing is important. The op should state when the original terms were in place. Were they there when he signed up and he only played weeks later when it is possible the terms had changed or did he read the terms and played almost immediately. More details should be divulged. It would also help if the op could state the amount per hand he was betting and the bonus amount he obtained. In case there is a dispute on the time frame of the change of terms the casino could well pay the op his winnings on a pro-rata basis ie if the player were playing a bet limited to 25% max instead of what he was playing. That could mean he could be paid winnings of say around 1400.

[threescatters]

This is in non bonus forum so I guess you won without a bonus, why would they care how much you were betting without a bonus?

[raul1]

I thought bonus complaint is problems with getting bonuses and not payment issues

Since the account is closed and casino would not answer my request for live chat transcript, I assume I have to use my memory only, I am 99% sure I placed 30 a hand in Blackjack for around 1000 hands never changing the bet while the deposit was 100 and the bonus was 111

This was according to terms I read, in the terms they wrote, cant bet big and then small or small and then big, cant play marginal bet, can´t do that and can´t do this, I did not play like that.

[bAdSmoker]

Yea, I hate when I walk into a casino and have to read over their terms and conditions all the time, before I get ready to play some black jack at a table, very frustrating.

Ohhh wait...

[vinylweatherman]

I thought bonus complaint is problems with getting bonuses and not payment issues

Since the account is closed and casino would not answer my request for live chat transcript, I assume I have to use my memory only, I am 99% sure I placed 30 a hand in Blackjack for around 1000 hands never changing the bet while the deposit was 100 and the bonus was 111

This was according to terms I read, in the terms they wrote, cant bet big and then small or small and then big, cant play marginal bet, can´t do that and can´t do this, I did not play like that.

If the 25% rule was in place when you claimed the bonus, your bets would have been against the terms. If the 30% rule was in place, you did NOT violate this term.

The standards for an accredited casino here are that in situations like this they should pay your winnings that were made within the bonus terms, and THEN bonus ban you or lock your account.

If you are sure your bets did not violate the terms when you claimed the bonus, you should submit a PAB next week after contacting the Red Flush rep right now with a more detailed case including your account number and your memory of how you were betting.

Remember, even if only ONE bet (the first one, for example) violated the terms, you have still broken the rules whatever style of play followed.

It is unwise to try to beat bonus offers with Blackjack play, as this strategy is one of the oldest, and would immediately draw attention to your account, indicating that you were unlikely to carry on playing after beating the welcome bonus.

It is far better to play a welcome bonus through on slots, you can STILL win, but the casino will find it next to impossible to accuse a slots player of "abusive play". Some operators have tried this on in order to void a slots win, but they tend to get a battering on this forum for this kind of feeble excuse.

[chuchu59]

So if I am not mistaken you thought you are only allowed to place a bet of no more than $33.3 for the game ie 30% of $111 whereas they are now claiming the bet should be no more than $27.75. Well, you should have made it clearer so we could understand. I still believe the timing is important. If you read the terms long before you deposited and didnt revisit them before playing its really your fault for not ensuring you complied with the terms. On the other hand, if you played right after you read the terms and it still stated 30% then they cannot argue that the terms have now changed. However, if the dates are confusing and both parties cannot come to a concensus as to when the terms were changed etc. then you could come to a compromise by applying the following formula: winnings x 27/30 with $27 being the max permissable bet and $30 being your actual bet size. The casino should understand that if the terms are altered right after or just before the player started playing they are bound to have grievances. You cannot simply state that a player must abide by any changes in the ts and cs especially after players have commenced betting.