Private Message: Thread classification
Today, 01:47 AM
pampercasino, I-Gaming Industry Representative
Hi Max,
Could you please tell me who classifies the threads in the forum? I understand a thread regarding us in the complaints section was classified as "roguish". Is anyone reading these complaints before marking them?
The thread in question is here :
http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...ng-no-pay.html
To summarize the case as stated by this individual.
He contacts support on live chat asking if "bonuses are cashable". While some bonuses are indeed cashable most are not and certainly no-deposit free chips are not cashable almost anywhere as far as I know. I don't know what conversation he had with the support rep as he has not produced any transcript but he then proceeds to redeem a free chip and now wants to cash out the free chip and not just the winnings (which would be withdrawable if he has met the wagering requirements).
Accounting obviously directs him to the terms and conditions page prominently displayed everywhere bonuses are offered. This page is also accessible from all pages on our site by clicking support --> Terms and conditions. It is also required reading right before you redeem any bonus. The link is presented to you EVERYTIME before you redeem ANY bonus.
On it :
"Term #1 - All bonuses are sticky
Unless stated otherwise with the bonus offer all bonuses offered at Pamper Casino are "sticky bonuses" Sticky bonuses can not be withdrawn from the casino, and will be removed from the account when a withdrawal is processed."
So this individual disregarded all notices to read the terms and conditions which is REQUIRED before you redeem any bonus, claims he contacted a support rep, asked a vague question, got an admittedly vague answer and now wants us to overturn our rules on a whim.
What's most important here is that he has not risked a penny of his own monies and the supposedly wrong info that was provided to him has not materially affected the outcome of the situation as it did not change anything. He would have still wagered with the free chip he had redeemed and would still be in this situation with an opportunity to wager more and try and withdraw the winnings.
Is this what passes for "Roguish" at Casinomeister these days? Or is it that nobody bothered to read the complaint and marking it was a knee jerk reaction just because the person saw our name and we have the same 3-4 detractors who bash us everytime our name is mentioned?
Bookmarks