If casinos consider that 'some' players have abused their bonuses which were offered in good faith, fine. Let there be no bonuses offered to the players in question after they brand them as such. So this can be done for the future but not retroactively.
However, this does not seem to be the main issue here.
Except for Vinylweatherman (lucky guy) many players here have not been paid for different reasons. Bonus abuse, poor ID identification, inaccurate bank details, processor problems etc. You name it and they have got it as a reason not to pay (yet). I might have a change of mind if Nifty gets paid by bank wire in the next 2 days. If they screw up on this one, then it's high time they are rogued as they are simply adopting delaying tactics promising to pay by one method and switching to another shortly after. In short, excuses covering excuses. Let's wait and see.
As for myself, I am giving them a week's time to settle their problems with ecocard which they state has legal implications and they are having difficulties with despite the fact that most
MG casinos easily have this as both deposit and withdrawal options. I deposited with this and they cant let me withdraw using the same method. Go figure! Nevertheless, King Solomon's also adopt this tactic. Let you deposit but restrict your withdrawal options.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Originally Posted by thelawnet
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks