|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Poker Complaints Complaints concerning Poker Rooms are to be posted here |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Why would anyone bother cherry picking hand histories? Do you know the amount of work it would take to start sifting through hand history files and deleting actual individual hands that dont fit with the picture painted? To doctor enough of them that it significantly alters the graph and stats in pokertracker? In case you say 'well players have already sifted through them to post them', they haven't actually, you don't need to sift through them with PT and it would be much much much more time consuming to go doctor HHs than to do what the players have already done which is just to copy and paste directly out of PT. Edit: Poker addict says cherry picking cant be done and he is correct in that the amount of time it would take is massive. Theorectically you could go in and alter the hands but my god that is a crazy amount of work. Its a nusiance even having to go looking for your own hands in HH files, it would be pointless endevour for several posters to start doctoring someone else's histories, and what would be the point as the cheater could just produce there own ones and say 'well u've doctored them' and the poker site would be in agreement. There is no reason for long time respected posters to doctor hand histories as it would void their case against the cheater. Quote:
Say you had a case against someone who owed you money and you showed bank records which proved it. And then this person starts saying 'lets see some proof'...proof which you've just shown them lol. This is what you are doing here. The proof here is more than sufficient in any court, what level of probability of guiltiness is good enough for you? If based on evidence a court decides that a suspect is 99.999999% guilty are they supossed to find him innocent because of that .000001%? One of the 2+2 guys with a masters in statistics says "off the cuff estimate I would give would be something like 10^20:1" on the odds of the events that have unfolded happening. Quote:
As for the big business would never risk money like this...Well we all know how honest big business are these days, they'd never dream of screwing over their customers to make more money, just ask Enron.... If it was an endorsed Absolute scheme, which there is no evidence for (and which I have no reason as yet to believe it was, I'm just theorizing), the facility for seeing hole cards would be given to an in house team who basically be playing for Absolute and making them a couple of mil extra a year. On your statement that why would they risk millions so that "hand full of player accounts could make a a few hundred thousand a year" - obviously if the player accounts were given the facility by Absolute it would be Absolute employees themselves playing the accounts and the money would all be pocketed by Absolute...no one is suggesting that they would just hand over this ability to some random dudes as you seem to be say people have suggested. However I think if it was an inside job backed by management they wouldve not been nearly as obvious, so this makes me think if it was an inside job it was done by an employee(s) without the backing of the ste. Quote:
|
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to ZFitz For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Sorry for long first post
. Just had to register and drop in to say some things to lots0.No. No there are not. If you have looked over the Poker Tracker stats and do not believe they constitute proof, you either 1. do not understand what the numbers represent, or 2. you are not intelligent enough to appreciate their significance. This has been pointed out to you before in this thread by other posters, but instead of responding to them or even acknowledging this at all, you just ignore them and continue to shout that "there is no proof". The mountain of hand histories that show these accounts playing FTOP-perfect poker and continually and consistently making moves that are only explicable if they can see everyone else's cards are merely the icing on the cake. These accounts and player(s) are cheating. This is indisputable fact. Quote:
The site was attacked and was taken down by PT Pat as a precaution. He has already pointed out, multiple times, that nothing malicious ever found its way onto the site, and even if it did, Poker Tracker does not automatically update, it just points out that you need to access the web page (you know, the one that had been taken down?) to download the newest patch. You're just making sh*t up now that is patently untrue to try and support your cause. I wonder why? All of this aside, PT data has been contributed by a whole bunch of different people (iirc, at least ten) who played with these accounts, and all the data shows the same thing - accounts that play nearly every hand, have a near-infinite river aggression factor, mysteriously "know" to fold preflop only when someone else has JJ+, call allins whenever they have the best hand (no matter how bad their hand may be) but never if they do not, and have an unbelievably colossal winrate which has never been seen before (or even anything remotely close to it) in the history of online poker. Unless all the people who have contributed this data have somehow been magically compromised by your hack-that-never-was - and for some bizarre reason all that this imaginary hack does is make it appear that some random guys on Absolute are the winningest players ever - then this data is legitimate. From an earlier post of yours; What a surprise. The reason for your indefensible stance in the face of utterly blatant cheating suddenly becomes apparent. Quote:
Regardless, your take on this issue is so stalwartly blind to fact (due most likely to your affiliate status to Absolute) that I do not expect to change your mind. I'd just like to add my voice to the masses of other knowledgable poker players who are well aware that cheating, fraud and theft have taken place on a massive scale at Absolute, and to point out to other readers of this forum that you are either shilling or stupid (whether the one, the other or a combination of the two, I don't really care) and your ill-informed opinions on this matter should be summarily ignored. |
| The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mg_ For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I have plenty of programming knowledge as well as poker knowledge and Poker Addict is completely correct that the site being hacked has nothing to do with the pokertracker softwares functionality. In case you don't know, pokertracker stores its data locally on your hard drive so hacking the site makes no difference to it. Nothing is being added, deleted or edited database-wise. Why the hell would someone want to hack into and alter hand history databases anyway, whats that going to achieve? As I've said already, the only thing of any use to a hacker concerning your poker playing is being able to see your hole cards, not pricking about with your database. Quote:
As I've said, what you are doing is the same as saying "ok whatever show me the proof" after the prosecution had just shown the murder weapon with the accused's fingerprints all over it and a cctv camera with him committing the act. YOU HAVE BEEN SHOWN THE FUCKING PROOF IDIOT! The whole poker community is on agreement on it. Ok, I'm done. |
|
||||
|
Just gotta love these drive by slammers...
Quote:
![]() Start with the personal flames and then move on to what can best be called "fuzzy logic" and you question my intelligence... Now that is funny. Call me a troller... Hmmm and just who is the new guy here... Who shows up and starts calling names. And no not the whole Poker Community is in agreement on this issue. Did any of you new posters happen to read the TOS here at CasinoMeister before you posted? Name calling and personal attacks are not allowed here. How about trying to hold an adult discussion of the issues without the childish personal attacks?
__________________
Cheaters Suck... Politicians Suck... |
|
|||
|
Hi,
I'd normally just ignore this, but this particular forum/site is important enough that all misconceptions need to be dispelled ASAP. Quote:
In fact, we have a staggering amount of proof completely unrelated to PT. In addition to all of the NL hands and limit hands whose *summaries* are in PT, we have Payup's (the 8/23 winner) final table HH from two different sources at the FT with him, including the second place finisher; we also have some of Potripper's (the 9/13 winner) HH from two sources and a lot more of it from one. Again, the formatting on these files is messed up and they have never been imported into PT, but I received them from the affected players, who in turn got them directly from AP support. From 8 handed to 3 handed, when the person providing my HH was knocked out, the 9/13 final table took 28 hands to play through. I have manually reviewed each of these hands and, again, will email anyone who asks copies of the history. Potripper played 21 out of the final 26 of these hands (that is, raising or calling PF), never showed down a losing hand and displayed a fascinating 100% consistency in checking down or folding if someone had top pair or better, while betting every flop they missed. In at least four out of the remaining five hands, someone at the table had JJ or higher in the hole, and in two of those cases, Potripper made his only two open folds (folding before anyone acted) of the entire hand history; in the other two, he made his only two folds to a single raise. Of course, the whole thing ends with the call with T high no draw on the turn. Again, we have a *staggering* amount of proof that is not at all related to Poker Tracker - it's hard to read, but it's all there, and the hand history numbers are requestable from AP support (better hurry up if you want to see the 8/23 ones, though - they only keep them for a month.) I don't know if you have any kind of agenda since there's already been one AP shill trying to discredit me in this thread, but if you do not, by all means email them or myself and ask for HH copies; they will be provided. |
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Adanthar For This Useful Post: | ||
fatshaft (20th September 2007), Pinababy69 (19th September 2007), SeattleSinner (20th September 2007), Sedition (22nd September 2007) | ||
|
|||
|
Everything I posted is fact. It does not surprise me that you are trying as hard as you can not to acknowledge it, because you have no answer to any of it.
I didn't call you a troller. I don't see why that should matter. I didn't call you any names. Your desperation to avoid actually addressing any of the points I made is comical. Other than you, and a small handful of others who are likely affiliates too, yes, they really are. |
|
||||
|
mg_ my last post was not about you.
I know its hard to believe, but I really don't think your post is/was worth answering.
__________________
Cheaters Suck... Politicians Suck... |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Adanthar said:
Quote:
We are talking Proof right? Some fact that can not be explained in any other way than Absolute Poker is cheating? Well lets all take a look see at your proof.... And just who is this "we" you speak of?
__________________
Cheaters Suck... Politicians Suck... |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Online poker - home to high rollers | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 0 | 29th May 2007 10:26 AM |
| High Stakes Poker 3 | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 3 | 13th January 2007 08:23 PM |
| aces high? | max1mike | Online Casinos | 4 | 28th October 2006 08:53 PM |
| THE BELMONT STAKES | mrracetrack | Sports Talk | 7 | 10th June 2006 09:44 AM |
| Omni casino | janetmac | Online Casinos | 2 | 12th October 2004 04:49 AM |
Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews
| Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots |
Online Casino Reviews
Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.