Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

Go Back   Casinomeister's Online Casino and Poker Forum > Online Casino and Poker Complaints > Poker Complaints

Notices

Poker Complaints Complaints concerning Poker Rooms are to be posted here

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 06:26 AM
Webmeister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 782
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 251
Thanked 339 Times in 188 Posts
Blog Entries: 6
Reputation Points: 1798
Rep Power: 16
GaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by WholeBean View Post
O.K. Here’s my nitty argument: Stop using the term chip dumping for what has happened. Chip dumping indicates a specific type of fraud. Chip dumping is a violation of a site’s terms and conditions because it is directly related with credit card fraud and account hijacking (correct me if I’m wrong). From what I’ve seen posted here the accused accounts have lost money intentionally to random opponents, not chip dumping. Although something suspicious is going on, losing money on purpose probably does not violate a site’s terms and conditions.

I hope you agree. The use of the term is inflammatory and detracts from the original accusation of hole card cheating.

WholeBean
I would say chip dumping means offloading chips. The player has intentionally misplayed the hands for whatever reason. The reason makes no real difference. Chips were being dumped. Yes, it is against the terms & conditions. Yes, it appears fraudulent. Maybe it was dumped to random players, maybe it wasnt. Maybe the security team have left town. Maybe they are out in full force responding to forum comments,

The use of the term was accurate & instead of detracting from the hole card argument, it actually adds flame to the fire.
The Following User Says Thank You to GaryWatson For This Useful Post:
Pinababy69 (23rd September 2007)
  #142 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 07:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Greenville
Posts: 13
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Reputation Points: 10
Rep Power: 0
WholeBean is on a distinguished road
Quote from Gary: The player has intentionally misplayed the hands for whatever reason. The reason makes no real difference.

I disagree. I'm just looking at this from both sides. There are complaints about player xyz indicating chip dumping. Security breaks out the manual and starts checking off conditions which must be met in order to prove chip dumping.
Condition 1) did player loose chips in a manner that appears deliberate? Yes.
Condition 2) did player recently deposit the dumped money using stolen credit card? No.
Condition 3) is an unauthorized person using the account to dump chips? (hopefully they call the account owner on this one) Answer: No.

Result: conditions constituting chip dumping have not been met. Account is free to play.

So, the reason the accused accounts are loosing chips in an obvious manner is to cover their obvious cheat play by playing like the donkeys their poker tracker stats suggest they are? O.K. I don't have a problem with that. It's just that that reason to loose chips doesn't meet the conditions of chip dumping as I understand them.

I kind of think I'm beating a dead horse here though. Probably I got into this discussion to late. I mean, if your going to insinuate that I work for AP, than I guess you've decided it's just easier to attack the person rather than discuss the points.

WholeBean
  #143 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 07:43 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,227
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 810
Thanked 2,701 Times in 1,309 Posts
Reputation Points: 14432
Rep Power: 154
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
http://www.poker-king.com:80/poker-k...hp?article=258

Looks as if Poker-King has been unable to elicit a statement from Absolute in the way that Bryan has.
__________________
jetset
The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
GaryWatson (23rd September 2007)
  #144 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 07:49 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,227
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 810
Thanked 2,701 Times in 1,309 Posts
Reputation Points: 14432
Rep Power: 154
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by SlotsWizard View Post
Lots0 is a no-BS, opinionated kind of guy. We aren't all going to agree on everything. I happen to feel that AP is up to no good here, and just because Lots0 disagrees with me doesn't mean I'm going to bash him.

Now can we move on and try to keep this thread about Absolute...
Good post, SlotsWizard - let's try and keep the thread on track, disciplined and with respect for each other's right to an individual opinion.
__________________
jetset
The Following User Says Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post:
SlotsWizard (23rd September 2007)
  #145 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 07:54 AM
jetset's Avatar
Meister Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 10,227
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 810
Thanked 2,701 Times in 1,309 Posts
Reputation Points: 14432
Rep Power: 154
jetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond reputejetset has a reputation beyond repute
Wholebean - btw I don't see GaryWatson attacking you - he's debating the issue of chip dumping with you.
__________________
jetset
  #146 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 09:07 AM
Webmeister
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Europe
Posts: 782
WTGs: 2
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 251
Thanked 339 Times in 188 Posts
Blog Entries: 6
Reputation Points: 1798
Rep Power: 16
GaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant futureGaryWatson has a brilliant future
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetset View Post
http://www.poker-king.com:80/poker-k...hp?article=258

Looks as if Poker-King has been unable to elicit a statement from Absolute in the way that Bryan has.
IMO, AP have sent a bunch of people into forums to discredit any suggestions of dishonesty. They have made no attempt to answer in any reasonable detail.

Currently, they stand to lose all of the serious players at 2+2 and beyond. They are banking on the 90% who do not read forums. Word gets around pretty quickly. It is probably costing them overtime payments sending staff to answer forum threads like this. It costs them nothing to come out and make an honest response. It looks as though they cant.

AP, at first was probably expecting this to blow over. Now they are hoping. They are not only losing players but they are losing the affiliates who bring them future players.

As for the chip dumping term, it only takes a regular poker player to read the 2+2 thread to work that out.

If AP are innocent, they need to investigate their staff
  #147 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 06:39 PM
Fully Registered
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 66
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 18
Thanked 14 Times in 9 Posts
Reputation Points: 80
Rep Power: 6
SeattleSinner is on a distinguished road
It just occured to me that if AP would admit that something has happend they would be responsible to refund all the loses players have acquired against these cheats. This would amount to millions of dollars which they quite possibly could not afford. Hopefully word will spread around and this shyster operation will go under.
  #148 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 07:11 PM
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,471
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2,012
Thanked 1,636 Times in 845 Posts
Reputation Points: 8908
Rep Power: 0
Pinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by WholeBean View Post
the accused accounts have lost money intentionally to random opponents,
That is the definition of chip dumping, is it not? When you lose money INTENTIONALLY, you are dumping.

In any event, the chip dumping is only a part of the story. There was fraud/cheating going on prior to the chip dumping. The theory is that they then went and lost intentionally to try and "cover up" what they had done. I've seen the hand histories that were posted...it was chip dumping, no two ways about it.

Edit: Sorry Wholebean, I just read your above post. The chips may not have been obtained via a fraudulent payment method ie. credit card. BUT, they were certainly obtained by fraudulent play. Of course, if you're a non-believer that these accounts cheated at all....I guess that won't fly for you.
  #149 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 08:21 PM
Casinomeister's Avatar
Mister Meister
 
Join Date: Jun 1998
Location: Here near my Bier, my dear.
Posts: 13,293
WTGs: 8
WTGd at 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks: 1,265
Thanked 4,031 Times in 1,482 Posts
Blog Entries: 1
Reputation Points: 21009
Rep Power: 15
Casinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond reputeCasinomeister has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by jetset View Post
http://www.poker-king.com:80/poker-k...hp?article=258

Looks as if Poker-King has been unable to elicit a statement from Absolute in the way that Bryan has.
I'm just checking my inbox tonight and YES, I have two more responses from Absolute Poker. This is after I acknowledged their first response (which I posted earlier). I wrote them back with the following:

Quote:
Hi Christian,

Thanks for the response. Please keep me up to date on the
investigation since this thread is getting a bit of traffic, and it is
pretty much in the forefront of the poker news.

With what has been posted, it seems that there is a fair bit of
collusion going on. I hope you can find out exactly what is happening.

Sincerely,


Bryan
So they wrote me back:

Quote:
Dear Mr. Wilson,

Thank you for your email.

We were unable to locate an account under the email address bryan@casinomeister.com. Please keep in mind that we will be more than happy to provide any information you may require regarding the mentioned account, once we verify you are the account holder.

To ensure the security of our customers' account, it is our policy not to provide any information about an account to anyone but the account holder. To verify that you are the owner of the account, you contact us from the registered email address or send us an email with the following information:

- Complete Name
- Nickname
- Registered email address
- Complete physical address
- Phone number
- Deposit method and ID details
- Zip code

By submitting this information, we will confirm your account rights and then we can properly provide you with the requested information.

Remember, that we are always eager to help our customers, however for your own security we hope you understand that sometimes we need conduct security checks, to ensure that your personal information is not distributed to any one other than yourself.

Thanks for playing at Absolute Poker! If there is anything else we can help you with, please let us know. We are here for you!

Sincerely,

Dan
Who da ef is Mr. Wilson? And then this one:

Quote:
Dear Bryan,

Thank you for writing us back!

At Absolute Poker, we want to make sure that your experience at our tables is great and will strive to do everything possible to meet this goal.

Please let us inform you that will keep you updated in the events of news.

Feel free to contact us again, should you have further questions or concerns.

Have a nice day!

Thanks for playing at Absolute Poker!

Sincerely,

Ana
Team Absolute ~ Customer Support
"To Continue to be the Best and Most Trusted"
Support@AbsolutePoker.Com

We’re Here To Stay! All Players Welcome!

Come and join the action this weekend with our 150k guaranteed on Saturday and 60k on Sunday! With more and bigger guaranteed tournaments, Absolute Poker is your place to play. See you at the tables whenever, wherever!
Why in the hell do they wish that my experience at their tables is great? I'm not a customer, unless they think I'm Mr. Wilson

Looks like someone is doing some hellacious bong hits in Costa Rica.
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy
~Ben Franklin

Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ Pitch a Bitch ~ Affiliates Click Here ~ Webcast ~ Quit Gambling! ~ Donate Now!

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Casinomeister For This Useful Post:
lauriejim (23rd September 2007), Mousey (24th September 2007), Pinababy69 (23rd September 2007), pokeraddict (24th September 2007), Sedition (23rd September 2007), SlotsWizard (25th September 2007), spearmaster (11th October 2007), winbig (24th September 2007)
  #150 (permalink)  
Old 23rd September 2007, 08:35 PM
Dormant account
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Nowhere
Posts: 2,471
WTGs: 0
WTGd at 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks: 2,012
Thanked 1,636 Times in 845 Posts
Reputation Points: 8908
Rep Power: 0
Pinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond reputePinababy69 has a reputation beyond repute
Quote:
Originally Posted by Casinomeister View Post
Why in the hell do they wish that my experience at their tables is great? I'm not a customer, unless they think I'm Mr. Wilson


Too much Bryan, that is friggin priceless. And anyone wonders why they can't find any evidence of wrongdoing? They can't even find their own bloody customers, or hand histories of existing customers. Honest mistake I'm sure, Mr. Wilson and Mr. Bailey are so very close.

Here's the head of Security out on a smoke break (sorry, no bong pics handy, a joint will have to do).

Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are On
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Online poker - home to high rollers jetset Casinomeister's Poker Room 0 29th May 2007 10:26 AM
High Stakes Poker 3 jetset Casinomeister's Poker Room 3 13th January 2007 08:23 PM
aces high? max1mike Online Casinos 4 28th October 2006 08:53 PM
THE BELMONT STAKES mrracetrack Sports Talk 7 10th June 2006 09:44 AM
Omni casino janetmac Online Casinos 2 12th October 2004 04:49 AM


All times are GMT +2. The time now is 11:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.2.0
© All Rights Reserved, 1998-2008


  Casinomeister is proud to present the following quality portals
Online Casinos | GoneGambling | Online Casino Reviews | Wizard of Odds | Games and Casino | Online Poker Rooms | BetOnCharity | Winneronline | Online Casinos| Online Slots | Online Casino Reviews

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service not affiliated with any casino. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.

Inactive Reminders By Mished.co.uk