Loose...Lose...Loss...Lost, Grammer Nazi !!!

[heatherad]

Very interesting thread Rob
I do have to say though, that having to spend 8 hours a day making sure my spelling is meticulous in my profession, I have come to the conclusion that I don't need to make sure every word is spelt right on the internet.
Unless of course it is for professional reasons, hehe. At one point I did make sure my spelling was up to par but not anymore.
So with that being said, I apologize in advance for any poor spelling on my part.

[RobWin]

Very interesting thread Rob
I do have to say though, that having to spend 8 hours a day making sure my spelling is meticulous in my profession, I have come to the conclusion that I don't need to make sure every word is spelt right on the internet.
Unless of course it is for professional reasons, hehe. At one point I did make sure my spelling was up to par but not anymore.
So with that being said, I apologize in advance for any poor spelling on my part.

No need for any apologies whatsoever heather,,,the main reason I started this thread was merely just to point out how the many various correlations of the words "Loose...Lose...Loss...Lost..." are so "Loosely" used in the context that they are used in here in the forum...hell I even spelt Grammar wrong myself in the topic heading...LOL !!!

[heatherad]

No need for any apologies whatsoever heather,,,the main reason I started this thread was merely just to point out how the many various correlations of the words "Loose...Lose...Loss...Lost..." are so "Loosely" used in the context that they are used in here in the forum...hell I even spelt Grammar wrong myself in the topic heading...LOL !!!

LOL, I noticed the Grammer part, and I do have to admit that I will be very careful in the future with the use of Loose, lose, loss and lost.
Thats why I said the thread was very interesting.
The rule I find most deceiving is the *i before e, except after c*. Ever notice how many words with the i and e don't follow that concept?