iNetBet again

[greasemonkey]

http://www.gamblinggrumbles.com/Repo...ithout-benefit



WOW! It is truly ridiculous and I will NEVER trust InetBet after these last few thefts on their part.

Basically, they are claiming fraud....buuuuuuut the player can produce any and all documents and didn't use a bonus.
At this point then InetBet can just call any winner a fraud and keep all winnings and deposits. How does this mess of a casino keep its accredited rating? That is the big question. They are openly stealing from players. Fraud? It would be the worst fraudster in the history of all fraudsters as they are apparently too stupid to even use a bonus or have an advantage in any way. If a person just wants to gamble their money at a casino then they would just do it as themselves and not a fake account.
It is beyond clear that Inet is just plain stealing money. It is disgusting to see.

[hausse222]

As i said: RTG is dead. Look at the Jackpotcapital case.

[anniemac]

Greasemonkey,

I think that the title of this thread is a little harsh considering that none of us knows anything about this except what has been posted at Gambling Grumbles. While I am not siding with either the player or InetBet, I don't think we can state for a fact that INetBet is wrong or that the player is wrong.

Unless the player decides to PAB here and let Maxd and CM hash it out, we will never know.

[cdomi66]

When they are saying a player is part of a fraud ring...are they saying bonus abusers? or do they have some sort of proof they are using stolen cc's or something?

I don't understand if the player is vip at MB etc (so security cleared thru them), isn't using bonus for advantage play...how the hell are they fraudulent?

[bb28]

I don't have a clue which side is in the right here and as someone else said we'll probably never know but greasemonkey you have an agenda with InetBet and really......it's getting a bit old.

[gaydave]

When they are saying a player is part of a fraud ring...are they saying bonus abusers? or do they have some sort of proof they are using stolen cc's or something?

I don't understand if the player is vip at MB etc (so security cleared thru them), isn't using bonus for advantage play...how the hell are they fraudulent?

Exactly. The real fraud is stating that there is any fraud on players part when there is nothing to be gained. vip at neteller and stuff. Not using bonuses. yeah, real fraud going on there
How many times can they get away with doing this before they are rogued I wonder? There was nothing gained by the player, they just won. inet is out of hand at this point.

[Nifty29]

I don't have a clue which side is in the right here and as someone else said we'll probably never know but greasemonkey you have an agenda with InetBet and really......it's getting a bit old.

Well said. It is getting very tiresome.

Obviously greasemonkey knows more about the issue than he's letting on. Does he know the person concerned? Does he have access to iNetbets records? Given that he wasn't even the complainant, you would assume that he has new evidence to present. Why else post someone else's complaint?

[Nate]

Well said. It is getting very tiresome.

Obviously greasemonkey knows more about the issue than he's letting on. Does he know the person concerned? Does he have access to iNetbets records? Given that he wasn't even the complainant, you would assume that he has new evidence to present. Why else post someone else's complaint?

With all due respect, this is exactly equivalent to the above post. Your constant defence of RTG is right up there with the aforementioned post.

My personal Opinion... I PRAISE Trustworthy Casinos.... I despise questionable operations. My posts reflect that thoroughly...

Nate

[greasemonkey]

I don't have a clue which side is in the right here and as someone else said we'll probably never know but greasemonkey you have an agenda with InetBet and really......it's getting a bit old.

Well said. It is getting very tiresome.

Obviously greasemonkey knows more about the issue than he's letting on. Does he know the person concerned? Does he have access to iNetbets records? Given that he wasn't even the complainant, you would assume that he has new evidence to present. Why else post someone else's complaint?

My only "agenda" is being against casinos that steal from players. that should be more than apparent. The only thing that is getting tiresome is those that blindly defend casinos despite the obvious theft that they undertake against your peers on this forum. That is very tiresome and the only thing that has an obvious agenda.

As for the rest of nifty's accusations that I somehow know some inside information that does not even deserve a response and is the very reason that so many threads get derailed and people get angry. Derailing threads and changing the point of the thread is getting extremely tiresome also.

[bb28]

I don't have a clue which side is in the right here and as someone else said we'll probably never know but greasemonkey you have an agenda with InetBet and really......it's getting a bit old.

My only "agenda" is being against casinos that steal from players. that should be more than apparent. The only thing that is getting tiresome is those that blindly defend casinos despite the obvious theft that they undertake against your peers on this forum. That is very tiresome and the only thing that has an obvious agenda.

As for the rest of nifty's accusations that I somehow know some inside information that does not even deserve a response and is the very reason that so many threads get derailed and people get angry. Derailing threads and changing the point of the thread is getting extremely tiresome also.

To be FAIR you should have quoted MY WHOLE post in which I said, I don't know who is right.

I'm against casino's who steal from players too but that has not be proven in that case or the others and how many threads have you declared it's fact when you know no more than I do.

Conjecture is not a fact and you implying it as fact = agenda, imo.

Also it should be noted that I have enough faith in CM and what he represents here in that I feel confident he would boot their ass if he felt that they were defrauding players. Since you clearly don't feel that way, I wonder why you hang out here.