![]() |
![]() |
ok Becky, the only games worth playing besides mystic shuffle are from RTG though, its like CXTM has a gun to ur back to say that everytime some mutters RTG and Bodog in the same breath anywhere in cyberspace ...
Do They? Their games suck, and most of the games that are included in ur 'bespoken' platform including ur blackjack and vp, besides having the code rewritten so they games' RTP can be adjusted at operator whim, look and feel like RTG games... Would U agree to that? And the names seem similar to the old RTG stable, for instance, Bodogs bespoken platform calls Goldbeard, the pirate video slot with big payouts and even bigger waits in between payouts, Goldbeard... Crystal Waters, well, its called Crystal Waters....
When was the last time u heard someone speak of 'Pirate Slots' in any sort of light? Well, that game is awful, but I doubt it will affect anything, can't imagine anyone plays it...
Ah yes, to my point...
Note that the Bodog Rep does not contradict the tone of this op. Instead, they just need to jot a note to correct u, (excuse my paraphrasing) "... silly gambler, for mis-naming the 'wholly proprietary' product that looks and steals just like an RTG, but it isn't. And that shows what u know... And btw, 3 testing groups said we are good enough at math to make our games pay out at a certain RTP, and hence, appear random over a large enuf sample, but in fact they have a 'turn' after which u cashout or u go broke... But what do u care, ur silly gamblers Teee Heee Heee!"
I am mean. They are dishonest and worse; indignantly condescending...
....then without that or playlogs you are just guessing. We always tend to remember the bad things over the good things, and it might surprise you if you were to keep such records.
Anyway, the part I don't get is that one minute you say Bodog is rigged (because they tamper with the source code), and the minute you talk about how you're still playing there.Sorry, but it doesn't give your theory much teeth if you don't really believe it yourself.
In fairness to Becky, she is correct in that the RTG games they use are not the ONLY games available, hence their actual product is not strictly RTG. When was the last time you played an RTG-labelled casino that had other providers' games included?
Of course we all know that many of the games are RTG, but if one is to describe the whole product it is proprietary.
Do they play with the source code? I don't know, and neither do you. So it comes down to trust like at any other casino. If you don't trust them, don't play there. No problem.
I just think it's uncool to accuse any operator or 'rigging' games without any proof whatsoever.
I cannot believe that . If this is really happening often it would be the proof that the game is not random .You see in video poker at least (Netent) if you get say 2 jacks, if you throw them away you will get jacks or better anyway, how can this be random?
Can you post links to other forums where people talk about that ?
I wonder why you are folding a pair of jacks or better and how often (lets say 100 times throwing away a pair of jacks or better ) you get the same after folding ????
KasinoKing (20th May 2011)
Achievements:
Thanks for posting - I was thinking the exact same thing.
This thread has got completely sidetracked to a discussion about RTG randomness, which though interesting in itself, it is no where near as interesting as the experience of the player in the opening post IMO!
Any chance of getting this thread back on track people?
Reminder:
Smile, it may never happen...
KasinoKing's News < Rival release their first ever 50-line slot.
SIX new softwares to try ~ Reel Layouts and Jackpot Odds ~ New USA Friendly Casinos!
Glunn11 (20th May 2011)
This is an interesting topic to me, and I agree with KK that it would be great if we could get substantive arguments regarding game fairness.
However, it seems that every claim that this is the case uses nothing but anecdotes or how a game "feels". These both, to me, appear to be nothing more than a positive feedback loop of sorts, where players disregard their winning streaks and focus solely on the losing streaks to make a pseudo-argument. Heck, I'm guilty of making accusations in my head when this happens. It's just the way the brain is wired. We seem to be conditioned against skeptical reasoning.
Nonetheless, I don't think that it's outside of the realm of possibility that the games are rigged. However, the burden of proof lies in the hands of the accusers, and I've failed to see any. With counter-evidence such as CSVs of play history and the fact that big names (such as Michael Shackleford [the Wizard of Odds]) have contributed to the creation and testing of the majority of online gaming software, complainants of game fairness need to be using the same mathematical rigor to prove their point.
While I'm not up to testing this hypothesis at this time, I would like to throw this bit in. We are all fully aware that Slotland's "Jacks or Better" game is rigged. The fact that it is a glorified slot machine is made clear in its rules. However, the way the RTP is controlled (in free play mode) is apparently not the same as it is in a land-based VLT. That is to say, I threw away a pair of kings and lost the hand. I admit that this was in freeplay mode, and if someone has evidence to show that it uses VLT-style RTP control in real money play, that would be nice to know.
If anyone is up to running some tests, might I suggest screen recording software. This would help in proving that paying hands, when thrown away, produce an abnormal amount of equally-paying hands.
http://www.nordicbet.com/eng/casino?...sw&popup=False
The link is for NetEnt VP at Nordicbet. Those who want to try will quickly see that the OP is wrong.
Yeah, it will of course happen. Because it is random. But it does not happens "almost every time".
Bookmarks