Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister

View Poll Results: Should the Grand Prive casinos be placed on probation?

Voters
326. You may not vote on this poll until you register in our forum
  • Yes, put them on probation - I think they have a chance to be de-rogued.

    104 31.90%
  • Nope, they don't deserve to be de-pitified.

    154 47.24%
  • I have a neutral stance on this.

    68 20.86%
Page 14 of 18 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast
Results 131 to 140 of 173

Thread: Grand Privé wants to get out of the Rogue Pit

  1. #131
    maxd's Avatar
    maxd is online now PAB guy at Casinomeister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entryTagMeister50000 Experience Points
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    6,556
    Blog Entries
    39
    Thanks
    1,701
    Thanked 4,676 Times in 1,909 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 24901
    Quote Originally Posted by jod5413 View Post
    I have to agree with your post. There is a world full of financial dealings that were not ever intended to be payed by them. They just want a clean sheet to start over.
    Which brings up an interesting question: are the people who vote for release from the Pit not saying, however implicitly, "we agree to forget about your past non-payment issues"?

    In a way it's like a bankruptcy, agreeing to wipe away past obligations. But usually in a bankruptcy settlement, at least a personal one, the bankruptee is expected to make an official statement regarding their recognition of the errors they've made and their plans not to repeat the process that got them there in the first place.
    Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker Rooms ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ "No Can Do" ~ Forum Rules
    NEW! CM's Annual Awards: Best and Worst in Online Gambling for 2011
    Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: read the PAB FAQ, Submit a PAB (don't forget to read the FAQ!), or dig around in the PAB Archives.
    Other stuff: Max's Blog (ICE reports, editorials, et al).
    Feeling generous? ... Max's Wish List at Amazon!

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to maxd For This Useful Post:

    jod5413 (2nd April 2011)

  3. #132
    I BEEN THERE's Avatar
    I BEEN THERE is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Keep Sniffin ~!
    Posts
    93
    Thanks
    124
    Thanked 61 Times in 36 Posts
    Rep Power
    25
    Reputation Points: 299
    In a way it's like a bankruptcy, agreeing to wipe away past obligations. But usually in a bankruptcy settlement, at least a personal one, the bankruptee is expected to make an official statement regarding their recognition of the errors they've made and their plans not to repeat the process that got them there in the first place.
    On the same token. Once a person files bankruptcy, you can bet your sweet a$$ that the same loaner will NEVER again loan them a dime. Once a major mistake is made ( as in this case ) how can we ( as players & advocates ) turn our backs & give them another chance ? The bank wouldn't loan us money again after we filed, why are we any different or they ? They made a major mistake... did they ever make it right >? I am for no more excuses from these site(s) that take our money and find every possible loophole to wiggle outta paying.


    I BEEN THERE

  4. #133
    silcnlayc's Avatar
    silcnlayc is offline Just one more spin pleez! Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Left Hungary
    Posts
    3,009
    Thanks
    367
    Thanked 1,820 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Rep Power
    95
    Reputation Points: 10590
    the same loaner will NEVER again loan them a dime
    Ok, here I need to disagree....My little sister filed over 10 years ago and she was able to borrow from the same lender within 2 years, including getting credit cards from the same card holders she filed chapter 7 against. It was an extremely bad time for her, having cancer of the spinal cord (she did not do it frivolously). But not working, the bills piling up..something had to give...So, never say never, because they did loan and she did get...from the same bankers/credit card issuers.
    are the people who vote for release from the Pit not saying, however implicitly, "we agree to forget about your past non-payment issues"?
    I voted yes because of the lack of places to play for the USA and it would be nice to know, I have someone (Bryan) have my back if I needed him. I did not vote to forget their past issues. I voted for protecting the player and Bryan and his site have enough pull to make a difference to make this happen for the players. (The protection/help)

    That is why the casino is asking to back in his good graces (IMO) because they know if Bryan says he will be here for us....the first mistep the casino does while they are in his good graces, will all be for naught and they have doomed themselves..so....to me....if Bryan gives them a pass, I will feel that many will be more apt to return and play there more often, and I think they know that also.

    At this time, USA players have slim pickings...and it would be nice to have one more place to feel good about...

    .
    Today is the Tomorrow, you thought about Yesterday...so live as IT IS your last tomorrow!

  5. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to silcnlayc For This Useful Post:

    DiamondGeezer (31st March 2011), Papa-ya (31st March 2011), slotjunkie (31st March 2011)

  6. #134
    ksech's Avatar
    ksech is offline senile member Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures10000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Here
    Posts
    1,309
    Thanks
    1,382
    Thanked 1,330 Times in 703 Posts
    Rep Power
    65
    Reputation Points: 7805
    Quote Originally Posted by Casinomeister View Post
    Side note, if they are placed into the Probation section, any complaints that come through will be dealt with. At the moment they are on a "no can do" status, and they are not located in a jurisdiction that entertains player issues. Just an FYI.
    So, question...
    If they are de-rogued, they then are out of the "no can do" status, but does this still mean (because of their jurisdiction and non-accredited status) players would only get the one shot deal for a PAB if a player has problems? I think players need to look at all the angles before deciding they want to play there. Too many past bad issues with this group, and just stating they are under new management doesn't seem like enough to persuade a past player who has been burned from playing there again. They can spew all the words they want, the bottom line is what and how they are going to change.

    They need to prove with their actions they have changed. They need to pay up what is owed to ALL parties.

  7. #135
    DiamondGeezer's Avatar
    DiamondGeezer is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    NOT Pennsylvania!!!
    Posts
    584
    Thanks
    845
    Thanked 292 Times in 184 Posts
    Rep Power
    32
    Reputation Points: 1921
    Very good points you two.

    I'm not sure a poll is the right thing for such a complex case. I've been yes, no and now I'm undecided!

    Personally I think the decision is a very complicated one and it's best left to Bryan. There are very strong arguments on both sides I feel.

    I think it would be fitting if he announced it in a webcast.

    Bottom line is it's his business and you can't please everyone.

  8. #136
    maxd's Avatar
    maxd is online now PAB guy at Casinomeister Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entryTagMeister50000 Experience Points
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Eurozone
    Posts
    6,556
    Blog Entries
    39
    Thanks
    1,701
    Thanked 4,676 Times in 1,909 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 24901
    Quote Originally Posted by ksech View Post
    If they are de-rogued, they then are out of the "no can do" status, but does this still mean (because of their jurisdiction and non-accredited status) players would only get the one shot deal for a PAB if a player has problems?
    My guess would be yes, they would be non-Accred like all the rest so the "One Free Shot" rule would, in general, apply. As ever though special cases would be looked at individually.
    Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker Rooms ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ "No Can Do" ~ Forum Rules
    NEW! CM's Annual Awards: Best and Worst in Online Gambling for 2011
    Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: read the PAB FAQ, Submit a PAB (don't forget to read the FAQ!), or dig around in the PAB Archives.
    Other stuff: Max's Blog (ICE reports, editorials, et al).
    Feeling generous? ... Max's Wish List at Amazon!

  9. #137
    baldidiot is offline Experienced Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    London
    Posts
    216
    Thanks
    32
    Thanked 112 Times in 67 Posts
    Rep Power
    11
    Reputation Points: 603
    Quote Originally Posted by maxd View Post
    My guess would be yes, they would be non-Accred like all the rest so the "One Free Shot" rule would, in general, apply. As ever though special cases would be looked at individually.
    Would the PAB status for players be reset? Ie: if a player has already submitted a PAB prior to the blacklisting of GP, could they submit another claim if they are let out of the pit? Or has that player already used up their "one shot"?

  10. #138
    tushtush33 is offline Newbie member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 10

    Pitched a bitch today

    Managed to pitch a bitch today, hope they pay

  11. #139
    spiderman is offline Newbie member
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Milky Way Galazy
    Posts
    38
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    13
    Reputation Points: 45

    I just got done chatting

    Chat InformationPlease wait for a site operator to respond.

    Chat InformationYou are now chatting with 'Donovan'

    Donovan: Hello and Welcome to our Live Chat service. How may I help you?

    s: I heard you guys were trying to reinstate back to probation status from the rogue pit at Casinomeister, is that true?

    Donovan: What are you talking about. O

    Donovan: I will not tolerate this sort of chat,if you do not have a relevant query to your account then I will end this chat!

    s: You guys have had lots of issues in the past with customers who post at Casinomeister

    s: Its a relevant adult question.

    s: Nothing personal

    Donovan: That is none of our concern,Player who play at this casino are very happy.

    Donovan: Well i dont have time for your adult questions,Do you have an account with us that you would like help with?

    s: As a paying customer they have every right to know that the site is fair and paying.

    s: Thats not how you talk to a potential customer.

    Donovan: Are you a paying customer?

    s: I never attacked the integrity in any way

    Donovan: Our paying customers are happy with casino hence all the free offers we have given them

    Donovan: Yes you have on your opening statement!

    s: So you don't care about treating new customers the proper way

    Donovan: Can I help you with anything else?

    s: That was not an attack that was a question.

    Donovan: New customers show a little more respect,not just come in here and accuse us of trying to move our status from rogues

    Donovan: Will there be anything else?

    s: It's a relevant question, is it not

    Donovan: Is there anything else we can assist you with?

    s: Well, I guess you don't care if I sign up or not then, right?

    Donovan: If you would like to sign up then we have great offers for you being our birthday month

    s: I do want to sign up

    s: but I know you guys had problems in the past

    Donovan: Those people that post comments are bonus seekers,all they want is free offers and never deposit,When we turn them down then they want to post negative things about the casino

    s: Are you sure its just that and not payout issues?

    Donovan: Not at all,we just paid $48,000 last week to our jackpot winner

    Donovan: And a few weeks prior paid another $138,000 to one lucky player

    s: I see

    s: who audits your RNG software?

    s: I don't see it on your site

    Donovan: BetOnSoft

    s: where are you guys licensed and regulated?

    Donovan: Within the U.S

    s: which company tests your RNG software (betonsoft) to see if it is fair and random?

    Donovan: I cannot say

    s: hello?

    s: you don't know?

    Donovan: I cannot say

    Donovan: I cannot give you that information at this point

    s: Why that info should be public and on your website.

    s: I cant find it anywhere

    Donovan: Will there be anything else regarding the casino and signing up questions

    s: Are you guys licensed and regulated at any jurisdiction, yes or no?

    Donovan: yes

    s: Where?

    Donovan: throughout the U.S

    s: Ok

    s: thanks then

    I just got done chatting and this is verbatim. You guys know more about them so tell me what you think. They have usemywallet.com, which leaves them little excuses to delay payments, as a processor and accepts US players so that's why I might give a whirl over there. By the way, Itech lab does their software auditing but when I click on the icon I get the top of the landing page and nothing more. And no where do I see a jurisdiction. All their site are identical in format and same deal with all of them.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to spiderman For This Useful Post:

    Casinomeister  (4th April 2011), Jasminebed (4th April 2011)

  13. #140
    vinylweatherman's Avatar
    vinylweatherman is offline Typus Infinitus Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Awards:
    Frequent PosterCommunity AwardMost Popular
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,795
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 6,844 Times in 3,671 Posts
    Rep Power
    271
    Reputation Points: 37443
    s: Are you guys licensed and regulated at any jurisdiction, yes or no?

    Donovan: yes

    s: Where?

    Donovan: throughout the U.S
    Well, clearly they have NOT changed.

    For a rep who supposedly doesn't know what you are talking about, he became VERY defensive, and VERY quickly.

    It seems as though they are trained to give stock replies to certain types of question, and I bet someone TOLD him to tell new players who asked that they were licensed and regulated in the U.S - highly misleading, and something a player with any experience will spot in an instant.

    He brushed aside the point about the negative posts on forums as the "rantings of a few bonus seekers" who were angry about not being able to get something for nothing - yet STILL goes on to offer YOU a load of freebies and bonuses if you went ahead and registered.

    Lying about where they are licensed got some Top Game casinos fast tracked to the rogue pit, so if GP are going to train their CS to lie about licensing when asked this question they are doing just the same.

    CS are usually a players ONLY point of contact with a casino, so they MUST be in a position to tell the TRUTH, and answer questions that it is perfectly reasonable to ask of an internet casino that could be run from anywhere in the world, and by anyone.

    I find it hard to believe that any casino CS rep could be THAT unaware of the current state of affairs in the US, given that CS have to be dealing with US players on a day to day basis, with many problems being due to the fact that far from being regulated by the US, they are OUTLAWED, and the DoJ is doing what they can to disrupt the flow of money between US players and casinos.

    It seems they are "pulling a Virtual", in other words, blowing smoke up Bryan's ass about this "turning over a new leaf" and wanting out of the rogue pit. They cetainly want out of the pit, but probably because they hope this will bury all the bad PR, and make it easier for them to convince new players that they are "regulated throughout the US" and other such BS.

    Pity this is only ONE rogue pit, they STILL have to contend with the HUNDREDS of affiliates they screwed over, who WILL be taking it personally, and therefore LESS likely even than Bryan to forget the whole affair.

    This was never about the wholesale shafting of players in the first place, they roguing was to do with the business ethics of shafting affiliates, and then going on to royally ream the Kahnawake & MGS, followed by making eCogra into an unwitting accomplice in the cover-up operation to make it seem that the affiliates were making a fuss about nothing.

    It is clearly FAR too early to consider a de-roguing. Questions like "where are you regulated" should be answered truthfully and CLEARLY - ideally on the website, so that players don't even need to ASK.

    I bet they would turn similarly evasive and defensive when they decided a PLAYER was no longer "flavour of the month" with them, and this could lead to that player having a hard time getting anywhere without help.

    Most of the "bonus seekers" he goes on about were DEPOSITING players, and who were doing nothing more "abusive" than taking all the bonuses they were PERSONALLY offered.

    I remember how abruptly they turned on ME when I suddenly became "out of favour". One day I had a call from a VIP host, who wanted to "get to know me a bit", and we discussed the leaderboard slots wagering contest, and how I was enjoying the competition.

    Less than a week later, it was "talk to the hand" - and I was escorted out of the tournament by security.

    They did make some half hearted attempts to get me back over the following couple of years, and they sent me offers, even called me, and I was promised all sorts of nice things if only I came back and made them one of my regular casinos.

    Now, when I DID dip my toes in, they broke EVERY DAMN PROMISE made to me - after all, they got my deposit, job done, no need to honour what they said BEFORE. This is no accident, this is POLICY, and just one of their "hard sell" tactics to tell the player what they want to hear in order to get that deposit out of them, and then renege on it afterwards.

    Until this deep rooted culture changes, no amount of window dressing, new management, new leaves, etc... is going to make any difference.

    It didn't at Virtual, and how many "new managers" have come and gone, each promising reform, but none delivering.
    Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
    Back to port for unloading.
    Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.

  14. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to vinylweatherman For This Useful Post:

    FourTeller (3rd April 2011), jod5413 (2nd April 2011), refre (2nd April 2011)

Page 14 of 18 FirstFirst ... 41213141516 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Rogue casinos = Rogue affiliates?
    By tbsweet52 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 5th September 2009, 02:30 PM
  2. [Rogue] Grand Prive Stuff Up
    By wayram in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20th January 2009, 03:30 PM
  3. Warning Grand Prive - rogue pit
    By Casinomeister in forum Casinomeister Warnings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 3rd December 2008, 05:45 PM
  4. ROGUE - GIANT PALACE CASINO - ROGUE
    By frankensite in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 18th September 2008, 12:03 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.