Casinos By Status
Popular Filters
By Banking Options
All Games
Popular Bonus Filters
Popular Forums
Forum User Features
Submit A Complaint (PAB)
PAB Rules and Guidelines
Browse PABs
Popular News Sections
About Us
). I just hope that you don't win anything large as you either won't get it or you will wait months while they trickle it down to you.
Weplant - I'm surprised you didnt check the Not Recommended List here at CM or at least follow the latest threads.
If you did , you might realise that Slots of Fortune has been involved in a long running dispute and is in the Rogue Pit (Not Recommended Section)
https://www.casinomeister.com/forums/threads/slotsoffortune-rival-casino-steals-my-money.40414/
I am also surprised that KK is still promoting them. Then again, maybe I'm not. I thought he may have re-considered his position on Rival Casinos but it seems he believes they are 100% safe and should not be on the Rogue List (which is his right on his website).
It's wonderful that they paid you faster than anybody else (wouldn't have anything to do with getting some free PR at CM of course...). I just hope that you don't win anything large as you either won't get it or you will wait months while they trickle it down to you.
On a side note, I notice that you seem to play at a lot of dodgy places like Top Game and white label Rivals (among others) - in fact, anywhere that you can get a bonus. My advice would be to be very careful where you choose to take bonuses, as it is almost certain that, at some stage (particularly if you win big), you will get screwed. I guess what I am saying is that it is in your best interest to keep abreast of what's happening here at CM and to stick to the accredited operators as much as possible....at least then you have a chance to work things out if there is a problem.
Please don't take this as criticism- just friendly advice from someone who has been there and done that
P.S. You didn't need to start a new thread as you already started one yesterday about SoF. Maybe you could ask Max to merge them

Just for clarification, they are not on CasinoMeister's rogue list, the are in the "Not Recommended" section.I am also surprised that KK is still promoting them. Then again, maybe I'm not. I thought he may have re-considered his position on Rival Casinos but it seems he believes they are 100% safe and should not be on the Rogue List (which is his right on his website).
Just for clarification, they are not on CasinoMeister's rogue list, the are in the "Not Recommended" section.
These sections clearly indicate different "classes" of casino - otherwise, why have 2 separate sections?
I do not promote ANY casinos who are on CM's rogue list.
KK

Maybe he will be the cause of Bryan making all affiliates remove their siggy links to their sites again as The King and others continue to ignore the siggy forum rule for rogue casinos in The Rogue Pit.Its OK KK, I understand.
The dollar is more important. After all, if the player gets stiffed you still get paid.
I am amazed that you are splitting hairs on this issue. I would think that most people would consider Not Recommended to be just as bad as Rogue i.e. they should avoid playing there.
As I said, you are free to promote whichever casino you like. However, you can expect your integrity to assessed accordingly.
Your recent refusal to accept the terrible business practices of white label Rival operators has caused me to lose respect for you. I'm sure that means little to you, but to me it is very sad. I also feel sorry for those suckers who trust that these operators are all hunky-dory and click on your banners.
I expected a higher level of integrity from you KK - I always saw you as one of the good guys.
P.S. I see you still promote Rockbet which is has the same owners as This Is Vegas. I suppose you can personally gaurantee that those same people won't pull the same stunts.![]()
You said the same about TIV in the past (before you became an affiliate and while TIV was screwing others). I can pull the post(s). Read the forum rules on your siggy pleaseI admire both KK and Nifty and respect their different veiws, this is how I see it.
Im 100% fine with promoting SOF, there has never been a problem getting a player paid as far as I go, there are Rivals we flat out refuse to promote and this is something that each affy should be prepared to back up why if they do. I have chattted with SOF many many times and have been assured that players will always get paid and I trust them.
A good affy will know how and whom to get in touch with should any problem arise at a moments notice and the top issue should be about the players and not about the money, players come first, no ifs ands or buts about it.
Laurie



LOL!Just a quick observation. Please don't let this thread spiral out of control, as it's the weekend, I'm at the football and everyone else will be spending time with their families.
Your "forum rules" link came in handyJust a quick observation. Please don't let this thread spiral out of control, as it's the weekend, I'm at the football and everyone else will be spending time with their families.
4.4 - Linked Websites The linked pages must not advertise casinos listed in the Rogue Pit. If Casinomeister subsequently rogues a casino, a webmaster is not obligated to remove that casino but will seriously consider its positioning.
Strategy and System pages must not claim or imply that a player can beat a game with a house edge with this system or strategy. This refers to the Casinomeister Philosophy that all systems are bogus.
The websites linked via the signatures will not have any content that can be considered "offensive" (see rule 1.5). Linked-to sites must display ethical behavior. If members find questionable links, please contact Linkmeister Simmo! who will review the site.

See what you started Weplant.
Christmas must be coming.![]()

Maybe he will be the cause of Bryan making all affiliates remove their siggy links to their sites again as The King and others continue to ignore the siggy forum rule for rogue casinos in The Rogue Pit.

Well, I honestly hope the negative comments of SOF are wrong..I just made a 40.00 deposit, did not take a bonus, it was down to a couple of dollars very quickly then started hitting, withdrew 300.00..Time will tell..I am trusting I will get paid very quickly again and if so it will certainly convince me to make this my rival casino..
See what you started Weplant.
Christmas must be coming.![]()

Maybe you will get paid Monday? I wonder if they pay on weekends?
I gotta try them out. I like the bonus with 15x...you never see that at Rivals, do you?
I am sure that when making that comment, you knew that nothing could be further from the truth. I care deeply about what you say and if someone asked me to name the 5 posters on CM I respect the most, your name would definitely be on my list. You are probably the poster who I have thanked the most in my time here.Your recent refusal to accept the terrible business practices of white label Rival operators has caused me to lose respect for you. I'm sure that means little to you, but to me it is very sad. I also feel sorry for those suckers who trust that these operators are all hunky-dory and click on your banners.
I expected a higher level of integrity from you KK - I always saw you as one of the good guys.
). I believe they are the second most profitable software I have ever played, behind MG. I have obviously also been working with most of them as a webmaster for a similar period, and also (with a few exceptions) have had very little to complain about. IMPO they (Rival) run a very fair operation.I am sure that when making that comment, you knew that nothing could be further from the truth. I care deeply about what you say and if someone asked me to name the 5 posters on CM I respect the most, your name would definitely be on my list. You are probably the poster who I have thanked the most in my time here.
But regardless, this forum is the Go To forum for casino info and you are part of why that is. 

Yep, and it looks like all are going to get a very big chunk of coal!!! Too Damn many ornery posters here!![]()
yes ornery posters we are lolThere are many Rival whitelabels that never generated any complaints after beeing in business for years.
Vegas Regal, Superior, Tropica are now rogue, but these places really dont belong there.
They operate on a much higher level than for example 21Grand.
I highly disagree with the way SOF handled things, but there might be more to that story we dont know, thats why a PAB would be great.
Places like SlotsNuts or Cleopatras Palace do not have a history of NOT paying players, instead they have NO history of ever PAYING a player.
Does RTG care? No way.
Slots of fortune Casino have stolen more then 1.000 € from me avoid them at all cost !!!
Take a look at Bryans final statement in this thread , there is nothing more .....
Completely agree Heador...and any webmaster or player who advocates playing there, is basically slapping you in the face.
More to the story? The guy played high variance slots at max bet, and got LUCKY. He just as easily could have zeroed out within a very few spins. Since when did playing slots become a form of advantage play? And what about Rival's oh so famous bonus abuser list? Where was this when Heador was depositing and losing? He was welcome to deposit and claim bonuses all he liked as long as he was losing. Soon as he got lucky and won...he's a "known" bonus abuser.
Bullshit. And shame on you KK and Laurie for defending these guys. I like you both, but this is EXACTLY why I don't want to make friends on these forums....I want to be able to call bullshit when I see it, and when I'm friends with people it makes it a whole lot harder to do. It is absolutely nothing personal...but you know this is wrong.
And Weplant...have fun with your "blood money", which is basically what it is when a casino picks and chooses who to pay as they see fit.
Completely agree Heador...and any webmaster or player who advocates playing there, is basically slapping you in the face.
More to the story? The guy played high variance slots at max bet, and got LUCKY. He just as easily could have zeroed out within a very few spins. Since when did playing slots become a form of advantage play? And what about Rival's oh so famous bonus abuser list? Where was this when Heador was depositing and losing? He was welcome to deposit and claim bonuses all he liked as long as he was losing. Soon as he got lucky and won...he's a "known" bonus abuser.
Bullshit. And shame on you KK and Laurie for defending these guys. I like you both, but this is EXACTLY why I don't want to make friends on these forums....I want to be able to call bullshit when I see it, and when I'm friends with people it makes it a whole lot harder to do. It is absolutely nothing personal...but you know this is wrong.
And Weplant...have fun with your "blood money", which is basically what it is when a casino picks and chooses who to pay as they see fit.
I think that "blood money" comment was quite insulting to Weplant also.

There's more but why bother? Me calling it blood money when someone brags about a fast payout from the same casino that is currently screwing over one of their fellow members...that's insulting to some of you? Ha...some community.
I find it insulting that anyone could say they play at or promote this shit hole...do you have rocks in your heads...for real? No different than Virtual. A casino claiming advantage play on high variance slots...and instead of boycotting them and blacklisting them...you're singing their praises.
But I'm the insulting one? Yeah okay...no wonder I don't post here anymore. Or not very much. Rocks I tell ya
Once again, Slots of Fortune is NOT a rogued casino here at Casinomeister.And I think that starting a thread telling everyone how quickly you got paid at a rogue casino, especially AFTER you already asked for opinions previously on this same rogue casino (and were given a link to the thread describing Heador's situation)...is more than insulting.
Just to clarify, the sites I have played on that are not accredited are the ones that have not yet been reviewed. i have only once recently played on a rogue site, and that was before seeing it was a rogue, and of they did not pay me LOL Anyways..If Weplant is actually getting paid when he wins and is having fun, than that is all that matters. It is at his own risk if he wants to play at a site that is not accredited. I have only once bought in on a rival site and they never paid me. I think it was called orangegamez or something like that. I won on a nondeposit bonus and when I tried to cash out they wanted me to deposit first and then make my withdrawal. i took everyones advice on here and chose not to make the deposit and let them keep the money I won. I did not want to take a chance. The thing that makes my weary about Slots of F, and Weplants situation, is that it seems to good to be true. paying you out in a matter of hours seems amazing, but it might a way to try and get you to play there more often and once you win big they won't pay. This happened to me years ago on golden palace. I was winning at golden palace a lot and kept making small withdrawals for around 200.00 and once i finally hit a real jackpot and got up to close to 2k and tried to cashout, they never paid me. But, weplant might have found a good place for him to personally play. After seeing how bad he has been doing on some other sites from his posts, it could be very refreshing to start winning. And as KK noted, it not listed as a rogue casino! If I personally only played at the casinos on the accredited list I would be broke and not be able to play online anymore. I have played at a few sites that are not accredited and done well. But, I guess we will see what happens with weplant and make our decision from there. I don't think it is very polite for people to flame or be mean to Weplant just because he chose to play somewhere that is under criticism. If it was actually in the rogue pit he would not have played there.Just to clarify, the sites I have played on that are not accredited are the ones that have not yet been reviewed. i have only once recently played on a rogue site, and that was before seeing it was a rogue, and of they did not pay me LOL Anyways..
I had to edit my post because I wrote about having a bad experience on slots of fortune, but it was actually slots of vegas that had ripped me off.

A while back, I decided (just like in this case) that anytime I post anything about a casino doing something right I will post a "disclaimer" that it is my personal experience. Now you know why. IMHO weplant just posted what she experienced. I thought this was a forum where you could post most anything and NOT get "tarred and feathered" . I guess I was wrong...and don't tell me about the good Rivals/Bad Rivals I've heard it ad naseum...we play, we don't play, we share experiences. Mt. Olympus can be a very lonely place. We mortals still have a lot to learn![]()

Well, I believe this has gone on way past civility.
"Blood money", now come on, Pina. That's pretty out there IMHO. You might want to take a deep breath and think before you post. Words said are like cards laid, you can't take them back.
Just saying.

I always think before I post...and I pretty much always mean what I say.
Nice support from everyone here for a fellow member who got screwed out of a tidy sum by a rogue casino. And any casino who takes the line that they have...is rogue, no two ways about it.
If it should happen to one of you in the future, and it very well could if you continue to play at white label Rivals...think about how you would feel if one of your fellow members then proceeded to start a thread highlighting their own positive experience at the very same casino that just cheated you.
Unfortunately, that's the problem with alot of people nowadays...they're don't care about the collective, but only about themselves. Just like Pokerdan said...who cares as long as they're having fun and getting paid, right?
Nice attitude. I'll take my ignorant and rude self anyday, thanks.
There is more to that "fellow member" than meets the eye. I'm not making judgments or criticizing him, but 3 failed PABs give a bit of an indication that he may not be just a "recreational gambler". There is nothing wrong with that as long as he plays within the rules - in this particular case, he did not. The problem is, the rule he broke was fundamentally unfair and unreasonable.Nice support from everyone here for a fellow member who got screwed out of a tidy sum by a rogue casino. And any casino who takes the line that they have...is rogue, no two ways about it.

I always think before I post...and I pretty much always mean what I say.
Nice support from everyone here for a fellow member who got screwed out of a tidy sum by a rogue casino. And any casino who takes the line that they have...is rogue, no two ways about it.
If it should happen to one of you in the future, and it very well could if you continue to play at white label Rivals...think about how you would feel if one of your fellow members then proceeded to start a thread highlighting their own positive experience at the very same casino that just cheated you.
Unfortunately, that's the problem with alot of people nowadays...they're don't care about the collective, but only about themselves. Just like Pokerdan said...who cares as long as they're having fun and getting paid, right?
Nice attitude. I'll take my ignorant and rude self anyday, thanks.
TGLKGKHKMYKTEMJKIWQSNNJUWSNNN2NSMMWQS,S,WS,,W,MD443I9I99IRMDMEMDMNRGMHYMKIMGFMThereismoretothatquoted"fellowmember"abovethanmeetstheeyeGREL,D,E,W.D.D,.TM,TGTRRKJYGGMHHMJNFRJIOKLWQLS,MD4UGGNHYJMH,JOPKLIPK.K.,F,DK,M,MSSThere is more to that "fellow member" than meets the eye. I'm not making judgments or criticizing him, but 3 failed PABs give a bit of an indication that he may not be just a "recreational gambler". There is nothing wrong with that as long as he plays within the rules - in this particular case, he did not. The problem is, the rule he broke was fundamentally unfair and unreasonable.
I already helped pursued the casino to remove that term, and FYI I was on Skype to the SoF rep for an hour last night fighting Heador's case and trying to get a satisfactory resolution, even though he did not sign-up via my site.
They were "making the right noises" and though a final decision was not yet reached, I am cautiously optimistic.
I know for you own reasons you have a total hatred of everything Rival, but please take a step back a bit, take a deep breath and look again. They are no Virtual Group and not the devil incarnate!
KK
PS: Sorry again Weplant, for the derail. Please don't let a few negative posters stop you posting your good (or bad) experiences!
I always think before I post...and I pretty much always mean what I say.
Nice support from everyone here for a fellow member who got screwed out of a tidy sum by a rogue casino. And any casino who takes the line that they have...is rogue, no two ways about it.
If it should happen to one of you in the future, and it very well could if you continue to play at white label Rivals...think about how you would feel if one of your fellow members then proceeded to start a thread highlighting their own positive experience at the very same casino that just cheated you.
Unfortunately, that's the problem with alot of people nowadays...they're don't care about the collective, but only about themselves. Just like Pokerdan said...who cares as long as they're having fun and getting paid, right?
Nice attitude. I'll take my ignorant and rude self anyday, thanks.
Once again, Slots of Fortune is NOT a rogued casino here at Casinomeister
KK
Note that there are other complaints about SoF on the net. Just because every single complaint isnt posted here doesnt mean that they dont exist.
The most condemning fact against SoF was this IMO:
While the casino returned the 100 Euros he had deposited to play this time it says it will only return the other 200 Euros in deposits, as it had promised, if David signs a paper stating that he lied.
The form the casino is demanding David sign says he must:
"a. Resign from all claims.
"b. Inform any third parties that were contacted by him in regards with information provided by him was not valid and truthful.
"c. Shall not disclose any details of this agreement and settlement."
In short, in order to get back his own 200 Euros, David would have to write to Gambling Grumbles and tell us that he lied about Slots of Fortune and then never let anyone know that the casino demanded it.
You do not have permission to view link Log in or register now.
That is IMO even more roguish than just confiscating winnings with bogus reasoning. Shows the lack of ethics by the operator.
Plus any Rival white label that has been around for more than one year isnt to be taken seriously. I can somehow understand that at the beginning you choose to operate as a WL (E or if the CS and cashier is good which isnt the case with Rival) but if you arent able to make it as a standalone casino after one year I at least cant take you seriously.
And you cant compare Rival with lets say RTG. RTG doesnt run a white label farm. Its completely different to simply license the software than to basically run the whole show.
