Cherry Red random jackpot results - For real?

[darkpixie]

Not complaining at all, I was playing go big or go home at first but then when my balance got down to about 200, I got cautious with 20-60 cent spins and still hit nada. (I played ALOT of spins) Anyways, I requested my play log from the casino, got it mailed today but its password protected???, so emailed support again to get that fixed up....

[takethemoney]

Not complaining at all, I was playing go big or go home at first but then when my balance got down to about 200, I got cautious with 20-60 cent spins and still hit nada. (I played ALOT of spins) Anyways, I requested my play log from the casino, got it mailed today but its password protected???, so emailed support again to get that fixed up....

You don't need a play log for that small of session to understand what happened to you. Even if you had played 20c per spin that's still too small of sample size to determine anything other than it was a bad session, most of which was self inflicted by your bet size.

[darkpixie]

I got the correct report now. I think, but its very confusing... Anyone an expert on how to read this stuff?
Total spins was 7507 at various bet amounts.

[SteveCut]

I just read through this thread and found it very interesting. Just to make it clear that I do not have an agenda, I knew absolutely nothing in advance about the casinos or the major protagonists in this thread. Here's my two penn'orth FWIW ( ≈£0.02 )

I am very surprised by the actions of the defence attorneys in this case. I picture them as crabs sitting in their holes saying "You won't find anything here. Why are you poking around here with those sticks? Why would you want to do this? What's your agenda?" When it was blatantly clear why the investigators were suspicious. The same players were winning what appeared to be jackpots over and over and over again. But rather than say, "yeah, that's a bit strange, we'd better look into that" they just continued sitting in their holes seemingly intent on trying to discredit the investigators.

To my mind the investigators clearly did not have any kind of personal agenda (unlike the defence.) I thought darkpixie reacted to some scuttling crabish forays with remarkable and admirable restraint and All4greed just kept poking whilst repelling the crabs with some deliciously well-aimed innuendo (apparently crabs hate innuendo. )

In the end it was the work of the investigators that uncovered the possible explanation that these repeat winners are not just jackpot winners, but high-rollers getting their occasional (highly advertised) big hit amongst their run-of-the-mill (nary a mention) overwhelming losses. Something that surely could have been clarified three weeks ago by the site rep (or a more pro-active defence attorney), thus saving the casino a lot of bad, and possibly unjustified, publicity?

Finally, I'd like to offer a belated thank you to one quiet, sensible voice suggesting an explanation earlier in the debate:

I might be missisng something, but I don't see anyplace where it says that they are necessarily random jackpots that are being won. It could just be that some of these people bet big so they end up with the big wins. I see it says big winners not random jackpot winners.

Okay I'll but out now.

Michelle

Personally, I'm still not convinced that these winners are genuine. Now if they were to display a list of big losers with names like Wayne and Tammy appearing again and again, I'd be quite happy to believe that!

[darkpixie]

Thank you for your kind words! If you enjoyed this thread make sure you don't miss this one http://www.casinomeister.com/forums/...e-randoms.html which was in the end locked due to the 'crabs' constant derailment. (and yes I took the bait unfortunately)

[all4greed]

I just read through this thread and found it very interesting...

Thanks for your perspective.

Last time I checked, Wayne A. had over $300,000 in big wins. Hope he didn't give it all back.

[darkpixie]

I'd be happy with just 10% of Waynes big wins...heheh