KasinoKing's SlotBeater Strategy

[RobWin]

So from this point on, there will new guidelines in place for signature links.

As we know, only senior members and above are allowed to have URLs (these aren't only for Webmeisters btw) - these rules are applicable for all:

I see nothing at all wrong with any of those rules. I just re-read them all and they all look to be more than sufficient to me.

As for slotbeaters.com, I have to say it does not meet the sig standards. The name itself implies that slots can be beat - they can't. So this needs to be removed. Thanks!

Simmo! will also be the one moderating the sigs btw.

With those new rules though, I would most definitely think that there needs to be equal enforcement of the content guidelines you refer to scanned by Simmo just to be fair to KK...just my opinion of course to be fair to all.

It's a shame that JHV chose the "flame" route after being warned in the past not to. As I mentioned a bit earlier "great thread - bad delivery". He was working on a third strike - and my tolerance was nil when it came to his delivery - which yes, was troll-like. But other members let their emotions get the better of them as well - so I'm re-instating his account with the understanding that he will abide by our expectations.

In all due respect to you and your great site here Bryan I can't agree with your decision on this one especially after the guy has been banned three times already for the same issue(s). Will the fourth time back be any different or will it only be a matter of time before another long time member here has to receive JHV's flaming type of wrath once more before he himself is permanently set ablaze once and for all?

Lojo as well was also a great poster who offered a lot of good insight into this industry when he was not on one of his drinking binges. Just comparing the two of them, why would one be allowed back when the other is not? Just curious. Either way, I support your decision here.
____
____

[hushda24]

I see nothing at all wrong with any of those rules. I just re-read them all and they all look to be more than sufficient to me.



With those new rules though, I would most definitely think that there needs to be equal enforcement of the content guidelines you refer to scanned by Simmo just to be fair to KK...just my opinion of course to be fair to all.



In all due respect to you and your great site here Bryan I can't agree with your decision on this one especially after the guy has been banned three times already for the same issue(s). Will the fourth time back be any different or will it only be a matter of time before another long time member here has to receive JHV's flaming type of wrath once more before he himself is permanently set ablaze once and for all?

Lojo as well was also a great poster who offered a lot of good insight into this industry when he was not on one of his drinking binges. Just comparing the two of them, why would one be allowed back when the other is not? Just curious. Either way, I support your decision here.
____
____

Make your mind up rob
You either agree with casinomeisters decision or you dont lol
You start out disagreeing and then at end you surport the decision
So which one is it rob ?

[RobWin]

Make your mind up rob
You either agree with casinomeisters decision or you dont lol
You start out disagreeing and then at end you surport the decision
So which one is it rob ?

You need to re-read my post hushda24, there is a big difference in agreeing with a decision and supporting one! One may never always agree on the same reasons to go into battle with their commander in chief but they will in the end support his decision as any good lieutenant would..
____
____

[KasinoKing]

Strategy and System pages must not claim or imply that a player can beat a game with a house edge with this system or strategy. This refers to the Casinomeister Philosophy that all systems are bogus.

As for slotbeaters.com, I have to say it does not meet the sig standards. The name itself implies that slots can be beat - they can't. So this needs to be removed. Thanks!

Is there anything else, or did I miss something?

Well you have missed that by saying that my 'strategy' has not really produced profits for me for the last 5 years means you are effectively calling me a liar.
I hope you don't get banned for flaming!

You have also missed that slots play at some casinos with bonuses (particularly Ladbrokes) is mathematically very +EV.

But hey - no big deal. Your forum your rules.
SlotBeaters.com does not get many visitors from this forum anyway, so I'm not really bothered either way.
I have removed the link, as requested.

KK

[hushda24]

You need to re-read my post hushda24, there is a big difference in agreeing with a decision and supporting one! One may never always agree on the same reasons to go into battle with their commander in chief but they will in the end support his decision as any good lieutenant would..
____
____

ok rob if you wanna say that.
Then WHY on earth make the post in 1st place ?
Oh we all know why dont we mr
Your just shitstirring.
Yours is a trolling post if i ever seen one
HTH

[jas2587]

ok rob if you wanna say that.
Then WHY on earth make the post in 1st place ?
Oh we all know why dont we mr
Your just shitstirring.
Yours is a trolling post if i ever seen one
HTH

Rob an I have had our differences in the past
but Hushda you are wrong here Rob is not trolling
all he is doing is saying he disagrees with the Meisters plans on reinstaing JHC
read the post sheesh an Rob I happen to agree with you on that timebomb

Cindy

[hushda24]

Rob an I have had our differences in the past
but Hushda you are wrong here Rob is not trolling
all he is doing is saying he disagrees with the Meisters plans on reinstaing JHC
read the post sheesh an Rob I happen to agree with you on that timebomb

Cindy

Here comes the army
Im retreating guys
Bye

[jas2587]

Here comes the army
Im retreating guys
Bye

retreat all you want your choice but you are 100% wrong

Cindy

an sorry I am not a member of Robs army

[Casinomeister]

Well you have missed that by saying that my 'strategy' has not really produced profits for me for the last 5 years means you are effectively calling me a liar.

I'm not calling anyone a liar. I am stating a fact that is shared by most experts in the field. Systems that claim to beat the house are flawed. That's all. If it worked for you - fine, I believe you. But it doesn't mean that it will work for others.

Will the fourth time back be any different or will it only be a matter of time before another long time member here has to receive JHV's flaming type of wrath once more before he himself is permanently set ablaze once and for all?

Lojo as well was also a great poster who offered a lot of good insight into this industry when he was not on one of his drinking binges. Just comparing the two of them, why would one be allowed back when the other is not? Just curious. Either way, I support your decision here.

I was just as patient with Lojo - I believe he got four chances too

My decisions never please 100% of the membership, I never expect them to. But I'm trying to be fair here, and there were a number of people who voiced the opinion that I relook at this, and I did.

[Jufo]

Well you have missed that by saying that my 'strategy' has not really produced profits for me for the last 5 years means you are effectively calling me a liar.

I don't believe that it is the betting strategy that has produced those profits but instead all the bonuses you have redeemed. I would be very surprised if the total value of redeemed bonuses is smaller than your total profits over 5 years.