Roulette69 manager situation

[BingoT]

Tatitiana spent two years lying to players on a daily basis while in their employ.Old habits die hard.

And to the best interest for all we know what they should do.
They don't need a Liar on board.
Once a Liar will always be a Liar.
That goes with the saying Once a cheater, always a cheater

[suzecat]

I strongly agree Bingo

We have two choices IMO. One says we believe someone who has proven deception/lies/tricks. The other is we believe a long-time member with a spotless record in this forum. Gee, that's a no brainer IMO

[mclee321]

I have to agree, Cirrus routinely cheats players and the staff have to be aware of this.

I'm no Mother Teresa, but I couldn't work for such an unethical company and follow their instructions, knowing full well you are screwing with the finances of ordinary working people.

In fact it makes me want to vomit.

The Chameleon ex Cirrus manager (if the reports are correct) is personally complicit in defrauding customers. If this were the banking sector (or many other areas dealing with money), she wouldn't work again.

[actech]

Makes me wonder. We have casinos that are fine and we happily play, are acredited, they payout if you win.......and we all know they make tons of money from us. We even wonder if they are rigged in some way or another.
Then there are casinos who are rogue, that lies to player, don't pay and all the shit we hear.

What makes me wonder how those rogue casinos even think they would make more money then honest ones?? When honest casinos makes millions.....Don't get that.They had to pay same money for software, personal etc. They know they will earn millions. And they lie, don't pay.......how dumb you had to be to start casino like all do, and you go rogue.......

[vinylweatherman]

Makes me wonder. We have casinos that are fine and we happily play, are acredited, they payout if you win.......and we all know they make tons of money from us. We even wonder if they are rigged in some way or another.
Then there are casinos who are rogue, that lies to player, don't pay and all the shit we hear.

What makes me wonder how those rogue casinos even think they would make more money then honest ones?? When honest casinos makes millions.....Don't get that.They had to pay same money for software, personal etc. They know they will earn millions. And they lie, don't pay.......how dumb you had to be to start casino like all do, and you go rogue.......

It's short term greed. In the SHORT term, a rogue operation will bring in more money that an honest one. Over time, the rogue will be exposed, and there will be a drop in revenue, but the honest operation will steadily grow on the basis of it's reputation.

Rogues often run short term scams, and then disappear with the money. They re-emerge with a new name, and repeat the procedure.

Crystal Palace and Virtual follow this rule in part. Crystal Palace casinos went for the full name and ID change, and pretended to be NEW casinos - but they had to inform their existing players, so the trick was quickly exposed. Virtual casinos repeatedly "turn over a new leaf", and even open new casinos that they pretend have nothing to do with Virtual.
Virtual are so good at being rogue that they STILL cling on, despite the internet being full of bad press. They prey on the very same greed instinct to recruit players, have a bonus program that is simply too good to be true (and it IS - they don't like paying once you are an overall winner).

[actech]

Still, they must be dumb as hell. They start with same money, and then they decide lets screw them, lie don't pay... And thats not pocket money to start operation, that have house edge and in no way you can get busted. Greed??? hm.......why would anyone wants to deal with all this shit to make quick $ if that is the case at all.

Even i made one or two deposits in rogue casinos when i start. But overall they got maybe 40$ out of me, as all the honest, acredited casinos and all that, make thousands out off me.
Would say that honest casinos are more greedy then rogues ones.

[chuchu59]

Something's not coherent here. You mentioned that Tatiana called the player initially to ask them to deposit (a cold call) and only when she recognised this player that an additional free chip was offered. However, in your other post you mentioned that Tatiana fully realised who the player was before she called him/her. Sounds contradictory though it may not matter much.

So it's now the player's word against Tatiana's. I think we should try to get to the root of things as this involves the integrity of 2 persons. Who is lying? If the player had taken free chips and deposited this warrants some explanation as to why Bryan was pm'ed. On the other hand, if Tatiana were making calls to all players who registered and not deposited why was I not contacted? I took advantage of the free chip and havent deposited as yet. Yes, I know. I am a bonus abuser

Quoting myself, less than half a day after this post got an email from Tatiana with a 400% match bonus. Sheer coincidence?

[BingoT]

I just like to know if any thing is new on this.
For some reason it seems I am at some Fish Market on this one.

[rubyroyal]

I just like to know if any thing is new on this.
For some reason it seems I am at some Fish Market on this one.

Nothing is new on this, Bryan is away at EIG. I informed Laurie that we will need to schedule a call when he is back in the office.

[paul02085]

If its true that "Tatiana" AKA Christine laughed when Laurie made deposits i wonder why? Was it because she thought Laurie was a fish that the casino had reeled in again? Sounds like it.

If true that tells me all i need to know about this person. Also gives me a good idea about her new employer who had to know what kind of background she came from.

They may be pure as driven snow but as a hirer/manager of people i wouldnt want someone from that background associated with my company.