You are up against some "big people" who do NOT want this to blow up in their faces. Since the player was paid, there is no case.
Rather than pursue the Daily Star, which might be trying to cover it up, approach one of their competitors, who might relish the opportunity to take a swipe at the Star, and make a story out of this.
You will also run into the old chestnut of "privacy laws", a great way to keep things like this covered up. The player concerned is hardly likely to complain they got paid when they shouldn't have.
To outwit "privacy laws", any complaint has to come from the person involved. Anybody who was NOT paid due to breaching the same term can complain to Gibraltar, quoting the precedent of the well publicised case of someone getting paid under the same conditions. THIS person could approach a competitor paper, and may well get further, since the story would involve the possibility that the Star and Will Hill did indeed concoct the affair as a publicity stunt.
William Hill are NOT "clean" by a long way, they have concocted corporate arrangements that facilitate them "getting away with" quite a few things that many ordinary players feel is not right.
1) They bought the assets, but SHED the liabilities of the Cpays casinos - pretty dodgy dealings if you ask me, and patently unfair to debtors of the Cpays operation, denied a proper liquidation and accounting for the monies.
2) They use the William Hill brand as a lure, but the ONLINE operation is NOT William Hill as WE understand it, but a separate corporate entity split off, merged with Cpays with a bit of Playtech thrown in, and licensed offshore. I bet most people seeing advertising here in the UK think they are playing with a UK regulated William Hill online operation, because of the high street betting shops.
3) They have promised to "clean up" their act, but many complaints are arising from the NEW entity, and it seems nothing much has changed.
I have not gone near my William Hill casino account since the day they ditched Cryptologic due to my general concerns about Playtech casinos, and their seeming lack of accountability to anyone, and nothing has convinced me that the new entity is anywhere near as "safe" as a venue for me as a player.
Seeing William Hill here as Accredited is the only thing that will convince me they have got rid of the ghost of Cpays from their operation, and are probably OK to play at again.
I am not sure either about the sportsbook side, since money was transferred back and forth under the old model, implying the same people are running the sportsbook as are running the casino, and it is NOT the same as the people running the William Hill high street chain.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks