my experience at 32 red

[maxd]

I find myself in such agreement with the previous post that I'm going to merge this thread with the OP's previous "I'm unhappy with 32Red" thread. It all seems to be on the same topic and to the same purpose AFAICT.

[TOC]

hi there
after a long time playing with 32 red and depositing and winning some and then depositing and losing more than i won (which is the way of casinos) i have lost my passion for the casino altogether. I do not mind losing as ....god i am used to it now but just felt that it was my time to throw the towel in as (correct me if i am wrong) but the average payout of 98% or whatever that happens only rarely but you are never likely to get a payout of much more on an m.g casino as then you would have to expect big losses for a while to bring you back to the parameters of their expectancy? I loved the casino and the staff there but just think it is time to try playtech for a while. Anyway thank you 32 red for my time there and wish you all the success in the future.

Geesh, I agree with the above poster Suzy, you have been there and done this before. If you're mad about losing at 32 then stop playing there and move on! No more need for the I keep losing at this casino, I removed their software but damned if they aren't nice people crap. You slam them in every post you make with the bad vrs good so stop. Try the RTG casino's maybe you have the lucky IP address..

[big_mac]

Well, I was going to say that moving to a different casino because you are having 'bad luck' is rather pointless and you might as well just move your computer to a different room - unless you think they are cheating, and there's no evidence of that.

But now the threads have been merged and I am reminded of the original, there seems to be little point!

[TOC]

Well, I was going to say that moving to a different casino because you are having 'bad luck' is rather pointless and you might as well just move your computer to a different room - unless you think they are cheating, and there's no evidence of that.

But now the threads have been merged and I am reminded of the original, there seems to be little point!

Although I don't agree with Suzi trying to bring down this casino without a good reason I do think that there's an alternative motive within the thread/ forum management, since it's been merged and so quick. I've seen no RTG threads merged and OMG there's been tons lately! Go figure!! What happened to Fair Play?

[Nifty29]

Although I don't agree with Suzi trying to bring down this casino without a good reason I do think that there's an alternative motive within the thread/ forum management, since it's been merged and so quick. I've seen no RTG threads merged and OMG there's been tons lately! Go figure!! What happened to Fair Play?

Geez TOC - still pushing the RTG barrow I see?

We all know YOU have a vested interest given that you operate an RTG casino - and we all know that CASINOMEISTER is completely impartial when it comes to software providers.

Max merging the threads had nothing whatsoever to do with Microgaming or 32Red or any other operator - it was about combining several whining member posts into one. Its been done plenty of times before.

If anybody around here has an alterior or hidden motive - its you.

[suzy1975]

In all fairness to 32R, suzy has something of a history of troubles and misunderstandings. Check her post history. I'm not saying she's a bad person, just that a black cloud seems to hang over her gaming and ... well, 32R ain't the first. Sorry suzy, just trying to put this in context.

That said I'll tip off the 32R guys to this thread.

Sorry Max but i have to disagree with you here as you do not know me and it does seem that 32 red has more than its fair share of protection from the c/m site. I thought this was a forum for members to have their say, well i have given 32 red a lot of chances but find it to be impossible to deal with anyone who puts a note on my account that management only can deal with the account and then for a couple of weeks "said management" go on holiday. If we are not allowed to have our say what is the point in being here as all you have done is turned people against me who also dont know me. I am disabled (deaf) and can not argue my point on the phone therefore have no choice but to go on live chat. I find it hard that other members come on here and slaughter casinos and not a word gets said however as soon as 32 red are mentioned the thread gets merged. For the record i think i was fair to the casino with what i said as i did not bad mouth them in any way i was just letting people know what had happened. No doubt further restrictions will be placed on me for this but i am sorry i will not stand by and have anyone saying there is a black cloud hanging over me when the facts are not known.

[mac-online]

I agree with spiderlegz. Suzy gets upset, I get upset, we all do. In fact The webmeister her did at suzi. I think that CM reputation was more harmed by their confrontation with suzi than suzi. Being a newbei I am now conserned about too much biast on CM's part in relation to casinos. CM is TOOPPSS because they are the Guard Dog. So don't get me wrong. I admiration what they have and are accomplishing for the industry. But soft spoken moderation is a quality that we all need to learn little by little. I am talking about me, you and them.
Love you all.
Peace, love and LOTS OF MONEY!

[maxd]

Sorry Max but i have to disagree with you here as you do not know me ....

Disagree as you like but you and I have some history here at CM and that is more than sufficient for me to draw conclusions and arrive at the decisions I need to. Do I know you personally? No, of course not, and that has exactly nothing to do with the subject at hand.

How many times have you PM'd me with "hey buddy Max, can you do this or that for me"? I'm guessing about a half-dozen times or more, give or take. We do for you and we do for you and still you complain about the help you get from us and then hit us with the "I'm deaf, can't make myself understood" stuff.

Suzy, no one is having any trouble understanding you. You are making yourself perfectly well understood. The problem isn't that we misunderstand you, the problem is that we disagree with your demands. Big, important, difference. It has nothing to do with deafness and everything to do with what is and is not reasonable.

I'm sorry to say this but anyone's benefit of the doubt only goes so far and yours ran out some time ago. After everything that's happened you use us to threaten a casino and expect to be pampered for it? No dice!

Your threads got merged because they were on the same topic and more or less saying the same thing. That's why threads _should_ be merged. You don't like it? Try posting on a new subject and voila!, no merging!

32Red gets treated well here? You're right, they do! They're a good shop, work hard for their reputation, are a top pick here at CM and they've earned our respect. Being rewarded for that is precisely what should happen. If you think otherwise you're entitled to your opinion, of course, but I think you'll find yourself in the small minority.

You say other casinos get slaughtered here. Yes, they do, and quite rightly so in many cases. If you look back over the history many casinos end up on the "Not Recommended" or "Rogue" lists exactly because people grumbled about them and raised the issues here on the forums. That's what the forums are (largely) for.

The bottom line is the good guys deserve credit, as you yourself say, where credit is due. And the bad guys deserve to be exposed. Sounds perfectly reasonable and very much in keeping with the CM tradition as I read it. How you can point to that as if it was a bad thing is beyond me.

[DiamondGeezer]

I'm all for free speech but time to lock this one down IMO.

[hippo925]

32Red gets treated well here? You're right, they do! They're a good shop, work hard for their reputation, are a top pick here at CM and they've earned our respect. Being rewarded for that is precisely what should happen. If you think otherwise you're entitled to your opinion, of course, but I think you'll find yourself in the small minority.

You say other casinos get slaughtered here. Yes, they do, and quite rightly so in many cases. If you look back over the history many casinos end up on the "Not Recommended" or "Rogue" lists exactly because people grumbled about them and raised the issues here on the forums. That's what the forums are (largely) for.

The bottom line is the good guys deserve credit, as you yourself say, where credit is due. And the bad guys deserve to be exposed. Sounds perfectly reasonable and very much in keeping with the CM tradition as I read it. How you can point to that as if it was a bad thing is beyond me.

Couldn't have said it better..... a great way to end this thread....no?