Hi Everyone,
As far as I see it, big bonuses are irrelevant to the casinos exposure to bonus abuse, and to it's reputation.
Big bonuses are meaningless. We could offer 10,000% Bonus if it had enough restrictions we would still not be in any trouble.
We have a policy of offering a mid size sign up bonus with more restrictions and a large bonus with less restrictions. There are players that mind playthrough/sticky and prefer a small bonus, there are players who don't mind restrictions and just want the largest starting bankroll to play for hours on end. We as a casino need to be able to cater to both.
It is when bonuses have too-good to be true restrictions that you must be concerned. 200% Blackjack bonus with no playthrough and no-max cashout? You know that there has to be more to it than that! 200% bonus with high playthrough, restricted games and such... can be more reasonable.
The old adage of 'if it sounds too good to be true...' is applicable even in the high tech world of today
Atleast that is my opinion. If I'm wrong and you guys feel otherwise, please tell me, since pleasing YOU is the reason we make bonuses for.
Kind Regards,
Nicolas Johnson
Regal Affiliates Manager
Bookmarks