![]() |
![]() |
I agree with you Vinyl that this would be great info to have, so we would all know for sure if they are truly random. I would love to see the results after all you brainiacs and rocket scientists decipher all that info. Lets just assume that you can get your hands on the info and you get all the data input into a super powerful PC, if MG has not already run north of 10 million spin samples then you are going to be running this test sample for 347.22 days assuming that you run 10 million test spins 24/7 around the clock which works out to 3 seconds per spin and hopefully you won't get cut off from the server during the test run, or you take MG's already run data at face value.
Then a year later, give or take a month or two you might have a 90 something percent accurate test sample. To me that's pissing in the wind, what's the point ? Just hit the button and spin the reels, pop the top on your favorite beer, kickback and enjoy your time playing and try not to put so much heavy thought into a process to where it is no longer fun...JMHO...![]()
There is no guarantee that the Attorney General of Louisiana or a sheriff in Kansas has not obtained a sealed warrant for violation of state law. I would not risk my luck if I were the director of a company which has been involved in online gambling in any form (other than the exempt special interests).
"The voice of reason"
http://mb.winneronline.com moderator
Sorry OT, but just have to say that if the payout does match the expected return of the new 5 reel slots this does NOT mean they are truly random and NOT weighted. It helps but it in no way would be conclusive proof the slots are not rigged in any way.
It is not just the return that is important but how it is arrived at, in-fact that is crucial to the games integrity.
OK, don't wish to derail the thread so any replies PM me.
Bookmarks