Quote:
Originally Posted by vinylweatherman
It would be enough to have the individual payout figures, this should be enough to determine if the game is really a random slot, or some kind of lottery game with wins displayed as a slot combination (as is the case with many of the new breed of UK arcade 5 reel video slots).
It may be "pissing in the wind", but a powerful PC can eventually do enough "pissing" to get a sample big enough to compare with the figures calculated by the forum scientists. The older video slots, the "cheating" weighted ones, have short reels, and the sample needed to get a pretty accurate payout percentage is a good deal smaller. Slots such as Thunderstruck though, would require a very big sample to get a figure accurate enough to show any possible cheating, probably north of 10 million spins! I have certainly found that samples of several tens of thousand spins are still too small to get any meaningful payout data for Thunderstruck.
|
I agree with you Vinyl that this would be great info to have, so we would all know for sure if they are truly random. I would love to see the results after all you brainiacs and rocket scientists decipher all that info. Lets just assume that you can get your hands on the info and you get all the data input into a super powerful PC, if MG has not already run north of 10 million spin samples then you are going to be running this test sample for 347.22 days assuming that you run 10 million test spins 24/7 around the clock which works out to 3 seconds per spin and hopefully you won't get cut off from the server during the test run, or you take MG's already run data at face value.
Then a year later, give or take a month or two you might have a 90 something percent accurate test sample. To me that's pissing in the wind, what's the point ? Just hit the button and spin the reels, pop the top on your favorite beer, kickback and enjoy your time playing and try not to put so much heavy thought into a process to where it is no longer fun...JMHO...