There is a good positive side to this, if any player is hit by a "policy change" that has NOT been posted here, then should we assume they have been screwed over?
A better way to gain trust would be to switch to Microgaming, who are a little more choosy who they allow to operate their software (probably due to the player protection scheme they operate for failed casinos).
In the original dispute, it was likely the players were after the bonus, however they did not break any terms that were POSTED at the time, even though this might have been an oversight. As casinos are often at great pains to point out, they don't want players trying to "interpret" the T & C, if it's there, it's a term, if it is NOT there, it does NOT apply.
I looked at the Slots of Vegas site when this dispute surfaced, and no indication is given that it is part of the same group, no obvious backlink to a group portal listing all the casinos, such as one might find with the Palace Group, Jackpot Factory and Casino Action. If there is to be any rules that apply to the group as a whole (such as only one SUB per player throughout) it should be made clear which casinos constitute the group.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks