|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Casinomeister's Poker Room Here you can post your experiences with online poker rooms - good or bad. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to jetset For This Useful Post: | ||
heatherad (11th March 2008), Mousey (11th March 2008), RobWin (11th March 2008), swampwitch (13th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
No, it was nothing like this at all. The Absolute cheating scandal was an insider job with no Trojans involved. The cheater could see all hole from all players.
The only plausible explanations are still: 1) Superuser account 2) Hacking into the server accessing run-time data/logfile. And this was only successfull because Absolute poker also made the gigantic blunder of logging/means of access to the run-time data before a hand was over.
__________________
Jack or Better video poker simulator| 5-Reel Slot Analyzer| Texas Hold em All-In EV calculator |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Zoozie For This Useful Post: | ||
heatherad (11th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
Very interesting article though, thanks for posting it Jetset.
AFWIW, "superuser" accounts are standard practice in almost every field of software development on the planet -- telecommunications, operating systems, games, enterprise management systems,etc etc, you name it -- so the question at AP is much more realistic if you ask "do he have superuser access?" rather than "was there a superuser account that he could have used?" Assume that superuser access does exist and you'll putting pretty close to par.
__________________
Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: new FAQ, Submit a PAB, PAB Archives ~ Forum Rules Q: Want 2 minutes of great advice for your next PAB? A: Read the PAB DO's and DON'Ts |
|
|||||
|
I don't for a minute think that's what happened at Absolute. However, it could very well be something similar that happens at any given poker room on any given day.
It also could be something similar (trojan/keylogger/bot drone) that enable(d) persons unknown to empty players accounts. (About which we have still heard little or no explanation.) So, while playing against a poker bot is not in itself a losing situation, playing against a bot who is in contact w/a 'sister' bot on your computer, however, is. (And believe me, I know from experience, firewalls and anti-virus apps out the ying-yang are not always enough to prevent infection.)
__________________
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad. |
|
|||||
|
Ok, totally OT but ... love the avatar Mousey!
__________________
Useful links: Accredited Casinos & Poker ~ Casino Reps ~ Warnings ~ Rogue Pit ~ Pitch-A-Bitch Stuff: new FAQ, Submit a PAB, PAB Archives ~ Forum Rules Q: Want 2 minutes of great advice for your next PAB? A: Read the PAB DO's and DON'Ts |
| The Following User Says Thank You to maxd For This Useful Post: | ||
Mousey (12th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
I think this guy's company is trying to ride some free media exposure on the Absolute scandal. He is right in that there are programs out there to try to watch player activity. I think in the near future most poker software will be able to detect odd behaviour and you can thank professional poker players for being able to uncover these cheats.
What happened at Absolute Poker was a super user account and an inside job. The super user was able to knock off pros and I find it highly unlikely that a professional online poker player would have any sort of virus or trojan on their computer. They care more about their security than anybody else especially with the amounts they have in their accounts. On top of that it is easy to see something funny happen when the player is involved in nearly 100% of the hands. Also the comments about these poker companies allowing money to be laundered or used for terrorist activities is another joke. He is either playing off of fears or just trying to ride the bandwagon. Send this to twoplustwo forums and see him get eaten alive. John
__________________
thisisvegas - the heart of gaming |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to thisisvegas For This Useful Post: | ||
swampwitch (13th March 2008), The Ronin (12th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Notice F-Secure didn't have a problem giving the name of Tariq Al-Daour..but leaves out the pertinent fact that the stolen credit card numbers he used when opening up casino and poker accounts were not obtained through vulnerabilities of the poker sites themselves.
__________________
When you get Raptured, can I have your stereo? |
| The Following User Says Thank You to swampwitch For This Useful Post: | ||
The Ronin (12th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
I agree with thisisvegas: Seems like a bit of a stretch to go from:
Quote:
To this: Quote:
What looks like really happened, horrible as it was, is he sole the funds from gambling and possibly poker player accounts. Plain and simple. Also adding the: Quote:
These knuckleheads used the money to set up websites inciting terror. Unless it was reported, and the convictions mirror the claim or report, one must again assume it is false. These guys are thieves, nothing more. Their political and religious views aside, they are simply thieves. And I thought according to their religion they are supposed to lose a hand for stealing Linking teror, poker and al-qaida etc (intentional mis-spellings) makes for a snazzy flash news article. The truth is much less flashy.
__________________
Position Position POSITION |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to The Ronin For This Useful Post: | ||
fatshaft (14th March 2008), swampwitch (13th March 2008) | ||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| King Solomons - what happened? | Fleur-De-Lis | Online Casinos | 23 | 4th March 2008 09:58 AM |
| Absolute Poker Could Become Safest Poker Room - Not | Rollo | Casino Industry Discussion | 18 | 21st November 2007 12:30 AM |
| DOJ visit to Absolute Poker offices - questions remain. | Ian_go | Casino Industry Discussion | 26 | 29th December 2006 11:13 PM |
| Absolute Poker Retroactively Changes Bonus Terms | pokeraddict | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 4 | 27th December 2006 08:30 AM |