|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Casinomeister's Poker Room Here you can post your experiences with online poker rooms - good or bad. |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
| The Following User Says Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post: | ||
peteyweestro (26th October 2007) | ||
|
|||||
|
A donation for "popcorn"? What's that?
__________________
Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy ~Ben Franklin Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ My Wish List ~ The Meister on YouTube ~ Donate Now! |
|
|||||
|
At the WSOP they gave away popcorn but asked for a donation to go to an unnamed charity. AP kept all of it according to one of the "detectives". This came a couple of weeks ago and AP has been asked to show what charity it went to over and over, something they have not done.
|
|
||||
|
They must have donated it to The Human Fund.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to SlotsWizard For This Useful Post: | ||
Casinomeister (26th October 2007) | ||
|
|||||
|
They are obviously still trying to cover this up, at this point I'd guess not so much to try to get in front of the bad publicity although for that reason too, but to simply limit the amount of money they are going to have to pay to cheated players. If it can be proven that this has been going on for years (as the net rumors have it) and need to pay back millions, that could get very expensive and be very messy. Also, how could something like that go on for years without some complicity at the top? Lots of questions.
It seems they first tried to deny anything was wrong and hope it would blow over (which in and of itself makes them deserving of a permant spot on the blacklist - just read their BS statements full of legal wiggle words) however when the statistics came to light that the outcomes were almost impossible to have occured naturally (I beleive the Wizard of Odds said that the statistical likelihood of an outcome like occured in the tournament was like someone hitting the lottery in six states at the same) they couldn't reasonably deny something had happened and went to Stroy 2. Stroy 2, being floated now, is that a well intentioned developer wanted to point out holes in the system and did some cheating to bring these security flaws to the attention of management. If this were to be believed it would achieve the objective of limiting damanges, relieving management of any responsibility and tying the case neatly off. It's not going to fly becuase it is just too insulting to one's intelligence. A good intentioned developer would have offered to give the money back, wouldn't have needed to cheat for months upon months, and really wouldn't have cheated players at all... a few hands played in a control group in front of anyone would have done the trick. Someone being able to see hole cards at an online poker room would spread to top management like wildfire - faster than news that asbestos was discovered in the Cornflakes would make it to the management at Kellogg. Gimme a break. We can expect that Story 3 will be the classic few bad apples argument. I think the main objective now is for upper management to protect themselves and to limit the monetary damages (and limiting the damage to their reputation as a byproduct). The main counter agrument is that this couldn't have been the management / ownership becuase they are making so much money they wouldn't risk cheating. I don't buy this arguement personally. Why do many wealthy people cheat on their taxes? Traders engage in insider trading? Some people are just plain greedy and unscrupulous on the one hand, and on the other so arrogant that they like to prove to themselves how much more clever they are than the rest of us but most of all becuase they think they can get away with it. Good show to the net slueths for turning these guys out and the media for turning up the heat. I hope they keep up the pressure until the scope can be proven publically. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to Rollo For This Useful Post: | ||
SeattleSinner (26th October 2007) | ||
|
|||||
|
AP has said they only keep hand histories for 2 months in a conversation with Mark Seif. I guess $20 worth of dvd's is too expensive or of course that could be done to get rid of evidence too, who knows. Another person has backed up this story. In other words there is no way they have the hand histories to go back far enough to fully investigate this or to give all the refunds.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad. |
|
||||
|
If they're licensed (they are) and the licensing authority does not have the ability to freeze their assets (they don't) and they only keep hand histories for two months (sure... and why?) then... well I'm out of words.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
It does look from their latest statements that they have finally decided to load all of this on the fugitive AJ Green aka AJ Ripper aka Allan J. Grimard....but I sense from their pre-emptive strike that we're going to be hearing from AJ quite soon! My own perception right now is one of a not very intelligent cover-up with ham-handed damage control that is actually exacerbating the issue.
__________________
jetset |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
jetset |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| interesting colluding poker bots article | REOdeathwagon | Poker Complaints | 11 | 13th November 2007 05:26 AM |
| UK pub poker to screen on SkyPoker | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 0 | 4th August 2007 01:06 AM |
| Unique Gambling Articles for better SEO | manman | For Sale/to Buy | 0 | 20th June 2007 03:14 PM |
| European survey | jetset | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 0 | 9th February 2007 01:12 PM |
| Poker BIG BUSINESS - Enjoy the article | jmildstone | Casinomeister's Poker Room | 2 | 17th March 2005 04:00 PM |