It is impossible to win with any bonus above 1000%. The max cashout is 1x bonus, so if you deposit $100, and get 2050%, your max cashout is the amount of the bonus after meeting 30x WR, which is LESS than your original balance of bonus+deposit. Since the bonus is "sticky", withdrawing 1x bonus will result in winnings of $0



Now this (for a laugh)
The reasoning behind this rule is simple. Whatever deposit bonus we offer is redeemable unlimited times. So if you are a player that enjoys bonuses
there is no reason not to redeem at least one of our bonuses on every deposit (no reason except bonus abuse of course, which we deplore)
This is their explanation for a permanent max cashout being applied, even if you don't take a bonus
Highlighted is where they explain that NOT taking a bonus is somehow "bonus abuse"
What next, will they claim that losing your 2050% bonus means that you are 100% CERTAIN to win on their RANDOM GAMES on your next deposit to even out the payouts, and that the max cashout rule prevents this
This would only be the case if they were using software "switches" to manipulate the games, such that players who NEVER take bonuses get a higher payout than those that do.
Funnlily enough, I have seen these terms somewhere before, almost word for word....
Prism/Virtual group
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks