Gambling Grumbles correction

**swampwitch** · 20th October 2011, 10:28 PM

I could be wrong, but I don't think anyone actually thought GG was promoting Virtual, as in Virtual Casino. I think most of us meant Virtual, as in Virtual-like...Cool Cat and the like. The word "Virtual" has become a catch-all for "crap" in the online gambling world.

If GG has indeed taken down all affy links to rogues...well done and good luck to you and your business.

**vinylweatherman** · 20th October 2011, 11:29 PM

Originally Posted by swampwitch

I could be wrong, but I don't think anyone actually thought GG was promoting Virtual, as in Virtual Casino. I think most of us meant Virtual, as in Virtual-like...Cool Cat and the like. The word "Virtual" has become a catch-all for "crap" in the online gambling world.

If GG has indeed taken down all affy links to rogues...well done and good luck to you and your business.

Cool Cat are part of the same group, who have a considerable number of casinos in operation. They are all as rogue as each other, being owned by the same dodgy character, and run by the same top tier management.

**Nifty29** · 20th October 2011, 11:54 PM

The actual links have NOW been removed, but were clickable a few weeks ago when I initially visited, so I stand by what I said based on that experience
.

If the links have deactivated then that is a positive step, although admitting that they once linked to those dodgy operators (not just virtual as below) rather than infer that I am lying to discredit my opinion would be even better.

Can GG explain why Rushmore is #3 in recommended casinos when they have a jolly roger? FWIW you obviously did not do any research yourselves in that particular case, as the casino is 100% correct and it takes but a few minutes to see why....but that's your call. I have no love for rushmore but I do believe in accuracy.

**Graeme** · 21st October 2011, 01:14 AM

Nifty, thanks for the comments on Rushmore. This is one of the casinos that has both impressed and alarmed us. So it's a problem to handle. However we have marked it down in the light of your comments and our own experiences. Thanks.

Do you perhaps remember where on the site you saw the links to the Virtual casinos so we can check and remove them. Links for Virtual were not removed as you suggest.
Or are you saying you saw links to other casinos you regard as rogue (if I can use Bryan's term)? That would of course be possible because of the subjective classification judgements that sometimes need to be made. bb28, perhaps that answers your question as well.

Anyway, our intention is that our members and visitors are protected against obviously dishonest casinos. I'm sure it can be accepted that opinions do differ. We can only do our best and try always to base our decisions on substantiated evidence.