Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 37

Thread: Tusk investments - anyone owed anything?

  1. #1
    Casinomeister's Avatar
    Casinomeister is online now Cheermeister Achievements:
    Meister ReferrerVeteranCreated Album picturesCreated Blog entry50000 Experience Points
    Join Date
    Jun 1998
    Location
    We be chillin'...
    Posts
    19,005
    Blog Entries
    7
    Thanks
    3,211
    Thanked 11,199 Times in 3,866 Posts
    Rep Power
    15
    Reputation Points: 59274

    Tusk investments - anyone owed anything?

    This just in:
    Tusk Investment Corporation

    (In Liquidation)
    international company number: 28453

    We refer to the appointment of Grant Dene Sparks and Raymond William Richards as Joint and Several Liquidators of the abovenamed company on 6 March 2008, and advise that the corporation’s creditors are located throughout the world and our detailed report to creditors can be accessed from the link set out below:



    We understand that you may have a creditor’s claim against this company.

    Should you have any queries in relation to this matter, please contact our office via the following means:-

    Email: tusk@ppb.com.au; or
    Telephone: +61 7 3831 2700

    DATED: this 18th day of March 2009

    Grant Sparks and Ray Richards

    Joint & Several Liquidators
    If you're a webmaster still owed by these guys, here's a point of contact.
    Last edited by Casinomeister; 19th March 2009 at 04:07 PM. Reason: removed confidential info :)
    Beer is living proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy
    ~Ben Franklin

    Useful links: ~ Accredited Casinos ~ I-Gaming Representatives ~ Evil Section ~ My Wish List ~ Donate Now!

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Casinomeister For This Useful Post:

    rikkerbuddy (25th March 2009), spiderlegz (19th March 2009)

  3. #2
    spiderlegz's Avatar
    spiderlegz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of Earth
    Posts
    895
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 375 Times in 247 Posts
    Rep Power
    40
    Reputation Points: 2581
    Players can expect to get some 20% back. Sucks especially for those who had several hundred thousands there.

    And the PDF that is private and confidential, its posted on a public webpage

    The only winner seems to be SimsPartners. Grant Sparks and Ray Richards both charged over 400AUD/hour.

    Edit: There are over 3000 creditors of which the vast majority are players.

    Further edit: The biggest single balance is somewhere around 650k. Ouch.
    Last edited by spiderlegz; 19th March 2009 at 07:46 PM.

  4. #3
    spiderlegz's Avatar
    spiderlegz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of Earth
    Posts
    895
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 375 Times in 247 Posts
    Rep Power
    40
    Reputation Points: 2581
    Wonder if MG will ever comment on this?

    And some wonder why there arent any high stakes games going on at Prima..

  5. #4
    pokeraddict's Avatar
    pokeraddict is offline Webmaster Achievements:
    Meister ReferrerVeteran10000 Experience PointsReferral Meister Second ClassFriends R Us
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,754
    Thanks
    193
    Thanked 732 Times in 360 Posts
    Rep Power
    67
    Reputation Points: 4016
    Quote Originally Posted by spiderlegz View Post
    Wonder if MG will ever comment on this?

    And some wonder why there arent any high stakes games going on at Prima..
    Yes this has devastated Microgaming's reputation in online poker. A year later it is hard to believe they still have no real comment and no real assurance that this will be handled the right way.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to pokeraddict For This Useful Post:

    spiderlegz (21st March 2009)

  7. #5
    spiderlegz's Avatar
    spiderlegz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of Earth
    Posts
    895
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 375 Times in 247 Posts
    Rep Power
    40
    Reputation Points: 2581
    Quote Originally Posted by pokeraddict View Post
    Yes this has devastated Microgaming's reputation in online poker. A year later it is hard to believe they still have no real comment and no real assurance that this will be handled the right way.
    I guess they have seen how little publicity it has gotten, the only thing being a thread at 2+2. No one seems to care even if we are talking about several millions.

    Even if much is hearsay MGs actions (mainly lack of it) casts a very shady light on them. Starting by the unwillingness to cooperate with the liquidators.

    Edit: Just remembered that the Primarep posted in the thread at 2+2 acting like he would be an "outsider" until he was outed by Pokeraddict. What a class act..
    Last edited by spiderlegz; 21st March 2009 at 06:43 PM.

  8. #6
    Mousey's Avatar
    Mousey is offline Ueber Meister Mouse Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures25000 Experience PointsOverdriveSocial Magnet!
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Up$hitCreek
    Posts
    2,850
    Thanks
    2,290
    Thanked 2,431 Times in 1,300 Posts
    Rep Power
    109
    Reputation Points: 12873
    Quote Originally Posted by pokeraddict View Post
    Yes this has devastated Microgaming's reputation in online poker. A year later it is hard to believe they still have no real comment and no real assurance that this will be handled the right way.
    OK... Tusk is who? what? An MG poker room that folded? The name rings a tiny bell... Wait... is this something to do with when Casino Action went belly up, then 'merged' (or whatever term you wish) with Casino Rewards?

    So... that didn't take care of the poker rooms and the players?? If I'm getting warm here, that is such a crappy thing to happen.
    Alice: But I don't want to go among mad people.
    The Cat: Oh, you can't help that. We're all mad here. I'm mad. You're mad.

  9. #7
    spiderlegz's Avatar
    spiderlegz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of Earth
    Posts
    895
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 375 Times in 247 Posts
    Rep Power
    40
    Reputation Points: 2581
    Quote Originally Posted by Mousey View Post
    OK... Tusk is who? what? An MG poker room that folded? The name rings a tiny bell... Wait... is this something to do with when Casino Action went belly up, then 'merged' (or whatever term you wish) with Casino Rewards?

    So... that didn't take care of the poker rooms and the players?? If I'm getting warm here, that is such a crappy thing to happen.
    Note: all amounts quoted are in AUD (at least thats what I understood so dont take it for granted)

    Correct. There isnt actually any good article that would include every twist and turn. Thats a big reason IMO why this havent gotten the publicity it should.

    The casinos didnt actually have that big liabilities (about $265k) and their assets were valued at $550k. So CR got them quite cheap ($815k).

    The poker skins (28 skins in total) were a different case tough. Amounts owed were significantly higher. Player purse $5,312k, affiliate balances $1,450k (I assume most is the skin owners balances) and trade creditors $2,000k adding up to a total of $8,762k.

    Currently the liquidation is still in progress but its unlikely that they will be able to realise more than $1,300k-1,700k.

    So the players will take a huge hit, the most common assumption being that they will get 20cent for a dollar. MG has been totally quiet and at one point via a lawyer stated that they will not step up and cover any balances.

    This isnt much of information but gives some clues of the amounts.

    I think Pokeraddict would be more suited to give a better overview. Basically the only information you can get is from the 2+2 thread (over 3200 posts). It can be found over here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...-close-141341/

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to spiderlegz For This Useful Post:

    Mousey (22nd March 2009), RobWin (22nd March 2009)

  11. #8
    RobWin is offline closed account
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    A Vault!
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    7,434
    Thanked 4,338 Times in 2,278 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 23468
    Quote Originally Posted by spiderlegz View Post
    Note: all amounts quoted are in AUD (at least thats what I understood so dont take it for granted)

    Correct. There isnt actually any good article that would include every twist and turn. Thats a big reason IMO why this havent gotten the publicity it should.

    The casinos didnt actually have that big liabilities (about $265k) and their assets were valued at $550k. So CR got them quite cheap ($815k).

    The poker skins (28 skins in total) were a different case tough. Amounts owed were significantly higher. Player purse $5,312k, affiliate balances $1,450k (I assume most is the skin owners balances) and trade creditors $2,000k adding up to a total of $8,762k.

    Currently the liquidation is still in progress but its unlikely that they will be able to realise more than $1,300k-1,700k.

    So the players will take a huge hit, the most common assumption being that they will get 20cent for a dollar. MG has been totally quiet and at one point via a lawyer stated that they will not step up and cover any balances.
    This isnt much of information but gives some clues of the amounts.

    I think Pokeraddict would be more suited to give a better overview. Basically the only information you can get is from the 2+2 thread (over 3200 posts). It can be found over here: http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/28...-close-141341/
    If that's the case then this is really going to look bad on Microgaming the Company and will most likey trickle down to ultimately affect the operators as well in the long term.

  12. #9
    spiderlegz's Avatar
    spiderlegz is offline Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Dark Side of Earth
    Posts
    895
    Thanks
    460
    Thanked 375 Times in 247 Posts
    Rep Power
    40
    Reputation Points: 2581
    Quote Originally Posted by RobWin View Post
    If that's the case then this is really going to look bad on Microgaming the Company and will most likey trickle down to ultimately affect the operators as well in the long term.
    It was actually one players, who has 384k stuck, father (who is a lawyer) that sent a fax telling that he intended to file a lawsuit against them. He was contacted the same day by a lawfirm in Toronto where they denied all claims and saying they were just the software provider. This was 8 months ago.

    Thats the only reply anyone has gotten from MG in the whole time. And that was on the same day and through a local lawyer.

    I think that they (creditors) should hire someone to write good articles which would sum up the whole thing and contain all the facts. Some well written articles would be a much better way to get peoples attention than a single thread at 2+2.

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to spiderlegz For This Useful Post:

    RobWin (23rd March 2009)

  14. #10
    Mellowman307 is offline Full Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Victoria
    Posts
    11
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 8 Times in 5 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 50
    I have been an active participant in the 2+2 thread.

    There is no evidence that Microgaming has not cooperated with the Liquidators, on the contrary the sum that Microgaming held for Tusk has been turned over to the Liquidators as noted in the Report to Creditors.

    In addition, Microgaming issued several press releases initially and the final press release indicated that Microgaming would comment further when the Liquidators were done.

    The Liquidators have not been forthcoming with anyone who has queried the progress of the liquidation so why does anyone assume that they have spoken to Microgaming about the progress?

    If Microgaming requires annual financial statements from their operators the soonest they would have known that Tusk was in trouble would have been when they recieved the June 30, 2007 statement, ie Oct/Nov 2007 as the June 30, 2006 statements show that Tusk was profitable at that time.

    When Tusk was in the casino business with just one poker room their profits averaged $23.5K/ month. It wasn't until they expanded into the white label skins that they started to lose $150K+/month.

    The owner of Battlefield Poker has just admitted that Tusk owed him $1M+.
    It is only reasonable to assume that he knew Tusk was in financial trouble long before anyone else was aware.

    And no I'm not affiliated with Microgaming other than as a player, but my background includes being a Bank Manager and I am fully conversant with financial statements, liquidations, etc.

    In my opinion, if you rely on others to do your "due diligence" when considering depositing in any poker room and things go wrong, don't look around to see who's got the deepest pockets and then try and attach blame to them.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Mellowman307 For This Useful Post:

    spiderlegz (23rd March 2009)

Page 1 of 4 123 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Tusk Investment Corporation
    By kassiap in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 4th March 2008, 12:50 AM
  2. Offshore Investments and account
    By goldfunds in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 01:57 AM
  3. Offshore Investments and account
    By goldfunds in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 01:57 AM
  4. Offshore Account and Investments
    By goldfunds in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 21st August 2003, 01:54 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.