I have not heard this one before, but it sounds like the usual bullshit when they want to get rid of a winner. It can mean anything, and the vagueness is deliberate. They have suspicions, but no proof. Opening accounts so close together can have made them suspicious. Their other trick is to delay their withdrawal for 10 days all of a sudden. They pulled this stunt on me a while back, and that was the last deposit they saw from me. The lack of payment probably means they are pulling the same stunt on you, but pointlessly so, since you cannot be tempted to reverse the money and play it (which is why they try this 10 day trick on some players).
They also lied to Simmo when he asked the rep about this 10 day pending period when it first happened to a German player. When it later happened to me, they got found out and I was able to confirm this was a "secret" policy change, and that they had lied to Simmo by saying there had been no change to 10 day pending periods.
It later turned out that only some players had been affected, and they quickly backed down when this became public knowledge on the forum, and the German player was told he would no longer be on 10 day pending.
I also question their integrity after this experience, which is why I uninstalled Lucky Nugget after this episode. I did get paid on day 11, so it never went to
PAB.
If they didn't ask for documents, but paid out initially, it is down to electronic ID checks with UK credit reference agencies. It is possible that the "negativity" is down to a problem with your ID on these credit files which at first they did not spot. Usually, it is about multi accounting, but in such cases casinos will say so, rather than hide behind vague terms like "negativity". In your case, the more likely problem is that your deposit methods do not link properly to your registration details, and they have a suspicion that there might be a problem regarding the money you are using which would only backfire weeks later. This has been known to happen when players deposit quite legitimately from joint accounts held with a partner or spouse. All the casino can detect is that the name and address on the source of the money is not an EXACT match to your ID.
The final explanation is good old "bonus abuse", but again casinos tend to say so, rather than beat around the bush.
If they pay up, you could forget it and look elsewhere, but if you worry that this "negativity" could end up on a shared industry database and prejudice your play elsewhere, you should
PAB in order to get the matter cleared up, or at least pinned down more accurately so that you can make an informed choice about what to do about it.
BelleRock no longer have a "true" player rep, Cobus is the affiliate rep, and can only refer the matter through to the casino management.
Bookmarks