Party casino seem to be "reputable" given how they are allowed to advertise on the telly, but these must be the most predatory terms ever seen. They are worse than Winward, who made it compulsory to wager plain deposits 30x.
Party casino are preying on the "newbies" here in the UK, through the TV adverts and program sponsorships. Even seasoned players often miss such things. It is in deliberately "long winded" language that might tempt people to skip such a large congested paragraph, perhaps dismissing it as "legalese" which to does look like on first inspection.
The term also seems to give the casino wide ranging and unspecified permission to void winnings, confiscate balances, dick players around with cash-ins "at the management's discretion".
Should be "not recommended" at the very least due to these terms (which would actually be ILLEGAL in the UK, falling foul of both the old unfair consumer contracts law (biased unfairly towards the casino - little or no rights to customer), and also under the new trading laws, which specifically outlaw 31 "business practices" as well as give the consumer extra rights to have terms of business CLEARLY DEFINED (no woolly subjective clauses).
In reality, these terms are designed to penalise players who don't take bonuses, as those who DO take bonuses are likely to meet the "party points" criteria alongside meeting wagering requirements. The bonuses are also likely to steer (or force) players to play slot games rather than blackjack.
I would suggest a PAB, so that this can be investigated, and maybe a casino warning - pretatory terms will result. This might get their attention, and they might decide to remove the predatory terms.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks