I can no longer play at Slotocash

[deucebag]

How can you be with the casino on this one? They should love players like her. This situation has been discussed in other threads, and like you said $20,000 may be pocket change for her, or other players. Hell, there's a lot of high stakes blackjack/craps players that will throw that much, and more, on a single hand/roll of the dice.

Either way, this isn't a reason to "beware" of slotocash, it's just a good indication for you to move on, Heidi

I think it's good that a casino bans a player they deem to be a problem gambler, however that can't be determined by the amounts lost. Some people can easily afford to lose $20k, others can't. I'm going to guess that the casino's decision had to do more what was said in the communications with this player, rather than with the amount lost.

[rockycatt]

I think it's good that a casino bans a player they deem to be a problem gambler, however that can't be determined by the amounts lost. Some people can easily afford to lose $20k, others can't. I'm going to guess that the casino's decision had to do more what was said in the communications with this player, rather than with the amount lost.

not trying to be a arse but whats your best guess at why they did stop you
and do you think they should have intervened earlier ?

ty R C

[spiderlegz]

I think it's good that a casino bans a player they deem to be a problem gambler, however that can't be determined by the amounts lost. Some people can easily afford to lose $20k, others can't. I'm going to guess that the casino's decision had to do more what was said in the communications with this player, rather than with the amount lost.

Agree. I also think the amount lost is somewhat irrelevant. The communications have probably included questionalizing the fairness of games etc. I understand this as Rivals wont even tell you your payout percentage.

I also recall that the OP had some similar issues last year with TIV (?). And usually it takes quite much for an casino to ban a player for losing too much, after all they make the most of their profits from problem gamblers.

OT I cant see why anyone would deposit any large sums at Rivals.

[heidisue76]

Hey guys,
I don't think it has anything to do with me being in a banned state. I probably did get in over my head at Slotocash, and they probably did make the right decision. I just received my very 1st e-mail from them, after posting a thread on here, lol. I posted my first thread in anger. They know how much money I make a year, and how much I have lost, and decided to ban my account for that reason. So sorry for all the trouble. I still stand by my belief that their machines are extremely tight and I can't believe I've gone through almost 20K in less than a year betting pennies (sometimes the max, sometimes not), but that's a lot of money even if I was betting the max each time. Anyway, such is the life of a gambler. They are reputable, and have always processed extremely fast cashouts, so I guess that's it. Sorry to have written in anger, but just still upset at the situation. I guess it will save me a bunch in the long run.
Heidi

[slotheadlizard]

Hey guys,
I don't think it has anything to do with me being in a banned state. I probably did get in over my head at Slotocash, and they probably did make the right decision. I just received my very 1st e-mail from them, after posting a thread on here, lol. I posted my first thread in anger. They know how much money I make a year, and how much I have lost, and decided to ban my account for that reason. So sorry for all the trouble. I still stand by my belief that their machines are extremely tight and I can't believe I've gone through almost 20K in less than a year betting pennies (sometimes the max, sometimes not), but that's a lot of money even if I was betting the max each time. Anyway, such is the life of a gambler. They are reputable, and have always processed extremely fast cashouts, so I guess that's it. Sorry to have written in anger, but just still upset at the situation. I guess it will save me a bunch in the long run.
Heidi

Thank you for honest reply, if even a little late. Don't worry about writing in anger we all do it. Its just important on this forum to tell all of the details. I'm fairly new to the forum, but some of the guys have been on here a long time, and seen and heard it all. They just know when something isn't quite right. Its really tough when you trash a good casino like Sloto.

I hope your situation turns for the best. You may be right about saving some money. Take Care, Good Luck

[BingoT]

Hi Heidi I wish you all the best.
We live and learn each day.
Good Luck to ya and all the best comes your way.
Tom B-T
And Slotocash is the best one out of them all too.
The best thing for anyone to do is to vent a little to let it out it helps the soul.

[winbig]

nevermind, just saw Heidi's latest post.

[kmay87]

How can you be with the casino on this one? They should love players like her. This situation has been discussed in other threads, and like you said $20,000 may be pocket change for her, or other players. Hell, there's a lot of high stakes blackjack/craps players that will throw that much, and more, on a single hand/roll of the dice.

Either way, this isn't a reason to "beware" of slotocash, it's just a good indication for you to move on, Heidi

It was, and is my opinion that it is good of casinos to be aware of their players and to look after their needs. While most probably think the casino should have no say in how we are going about our gambling, it showed to me that they had taken a decision to ban, possibly due to the amounts lost.

If a casino wants to do this, I don't believe it should be an outright ban and they should speak to the player to talk over their concerns. It just strikes me that a casino which is actively aware of all of its members is a far better place than one which is happy to have no concerns over players' deposits.

Kind of puts a new twist on things. We see enough casinos refusing withdrawals, yet here is one refusing deposits. Doesn't happen often.

[winbig]

It was, and is my opinion that it is good of casinos to be aware of their players and to look after their needs. While most probably think the casino should have no say in how we are going about our gambling, it showed to me that they had taken a decision to ban, possibly due to the amounts lost.

If a casino wants to do this, I don't believe it should be an outright ban and they should speak to the player to talk over their concerns. It just strikes me that a casino which is actively aware of all of its members is a far better place than one which is happy to have no concerns over players' deposits.

Kind of puts a new twist on things. We see enough casinos refusing withdrawals, yet here is one refusing deposits. Doesn't happen often.

I have to retract all of my statements, simply because Heidi came out and said that Sloto knew her financial standing, and banned her because it.

This is just another case of someone telling us only what they want us to hear, to get people on their side.

This thread would have taken a totally different road from the get-go if she had came right out and let us know what the exact circumstances were.

down the road, she finally did:

Originally Posted by heidisue76 View Post
I posted my first thread in anger. They know how much money I make a year, and how much I have lost, and decided to ban my account for that reason.

[silcnlayc]

They know how much money I make a year

Just curious as to how they would know this? I know I wouldn't give any casino such personal information because I feel it is none of their business how much I made.
.