Redflush?

[maxd]

Makes one wonder if the only motivation for accredidation is $$$$$$$$.

That's a hell of a leap from questioning the worthiness of some of the Accredited folks to accusing CM of rigged accreditation. Unjustified to say the least, not to mention delivered in poor taste.

Casinos wax and wane like everything else, and when they wane too far they get pulled from the list. No conspiracy, that's just how things go.

[jas2587]

I have cashed out via UseMyWallet
at least 8xs an I give them a huge
always prompt withen 24 hrs

Cindy

Good Luck All

[bb28]

CM promotes Red Flush, and I think he should be given feed back of how a casino is running. Check withdrawl is always a problem with excuses for US? I don't think so, I have withdrawn from many casinos. My point was I was giving 2 different excuses, still no check, they have taken $35 from me and wouldn't even refund that from RED Flush. They had no problem taking my money and giving out 100% bonuses, but a simple $35 they couldn't reimburse! Don't you think thats a little unreasonable? Do you think CM would approve? Would you be happy to be treated like I was from this casino?

First my comment was directed toward Pacers, I quoted his post. As for you.......Yes, I agree what happened to you is unreasonable. No I wouldn't be happy about it if I were treated that way. You have ever right to complain.
Again......My comment was not directed at you.......I was just stating a general fact about the delay on check withdrawals. As for my comment about don't you think that was a little harsh........I was talking to Pacers......not you.

[suzecat]

CM promotes Red Flush, and I think he should be given feed back of how a casino is running. Check withdrawl is always a problem with excuses for US? I don't think so, I have withdrawn from many casinos.

Yes, CM appreciates CONSTRUCTIVE criticism of the casinos he promotes. And Yes, WD by check has become a HUGE problem for US players. Do some research on this site and there will be info about the current situation.

My point was I was giving 2 different excuses, still no check, they have taken $35 from me and wouldn't even refund that from RED Flush. They had no problem taking my money and giving out 100% bonuses, but a simple $35 they couldn't reimburse! Don't you think thats a little unreasonable?

Since you asked, I think you find that unreasonable.

Do you think CM would approve? Would you be happy to be treated like I was from this casino?

I can't speak for CM, but in his absence maxd or simmo! can.........and probably will.

The current us player situation does not make me happy. Kinda tanks the fun/entertainment value for sure.

[vinylweatherman]

We all know about the problems with US checks, and so would Red Flush I expect. It is therefore completely out of order to charge an OPTIONAL $35 for a faster delivery, when no such service can be provided.
The excuses are a load of rubbish, the real reason is nothing to do with "mistakes", and "couriers", it is to do with the processors hired by the casinos. It is more likely that events overtook the issuing of the check, and it had to be cancelled before it was placed with the courier. This will be obvious, as if the check were sent, but then had to be cancelled, the courier will simply deliver a dud check, with the player having to wait for the real one.

It is quite some surprise that the casino cannot afford to reimburse the measly sum of $35 for what is, after all, a fault of THEIR payment systems, and nothing to do with the player. To offer $10 worth of comps is an insult to the player, and hardly seems the thing to do to build a long term relationship.

Perhaps long term customer relationships are no longer that valuable now for US players, and saving $25 from the bottom line now is better business planning than spending it in the hope of recouping more in the longer term.

Perhaps MG is going to bail altogether from the US in the near future given this serious escalation in payment problems sparked by the seizure of some $26 Million in transit to players.

Unfortunately, such bail outs will happen more or less overnight, as happened with other software providers and eWallets. There will be little or no opportunity for players to fulfil promotional requirements, as the previous pattern has favoured locking accounts and providing for a withdrawal process through contact with CS, giving no opportunity for further play.

RTG will probably be the least affected by this, along with, it seems, one other unique casino portal.

[pacers31]

I understand that casinos can and do deteriorate over time. I guess my point is that the accredited list seems to be just as much of a guess as pointing and clicking one off the top of your head. I only point this out as many members seem to believe that you "can't go wrong" with a CM accredited site and that is just not true. Max, do casinos pay any sort of fee to become accredited here? If so, IMO it makes the list suspect, that's all.

[pacers31]

bb, you made the statement that check withdrawls are a problem for the US and presented it as fact. As a regular poster, you should know that it isn't true. I have had check withdrawls and postal money orders sent to me by casinos with no problem, so I would suggest that you be a little more accurate in your observation. You must believe that it is a problem because CM tells you so. Why then does 3Dice get me a MO in 3 days??? Just wanted to set the record straight.

[jas2587]

3Dice is 1 casino
where as there are 100's+
I use a ewallet as my bank refuse's to
cash a check that even hints that its non USA

yes they are drawn on a USA bank
but they also have on them


example: Bank Of Indonesia

and my bank sends back will
not cash International checks


so you are damned if ya take a check an damned if ya dont

Cindy
Good Luck

[pacers31]

I don't recall seeing anything other than the US bank that the checks I've received are drawn on. Why is it that 3Dice can do it and apparently noone else can??? The whole thing makes no sense at all.

[vinylweatherman]

I don't recall seeing anything other than the US bank that the checks I've received are drawn on. Why is it that 3Dice can do it and apparently noone else can??? The whole thing makes no sense at all.

I believe 3Dice do everything "in house", whereas others use a third party processor. There must be something unique about the 3Dice setup that other casinos cannot mimic. 3Dice are unlikely to say exactly what this is, otherwise their ability to pay could be shut down by the DoJ.