I left out static IP because it is not something most home users get. This is because there are not enough IP addresses available in the current standard, so the switch to dynamic IP addresses has been made by almost all ISPs. Static IP addresses are available by request, but cost more as they are no longer available for dynamic allocation to other customers, with the risk that an ISP will run out of IP addresses under heavy load and not be able to serve it's customers.
NTL used to offer static IP addresses for the cable connection, but this switched to dynamic long before Virgin took over.
The new standard, when fully implemented globally, will solve the problem, and every customer and every device will be able to have it's own unique static IP address. The hold up is that not everything is compatible with this new standard, so it cannot be rolled out.
Computers and other devices CAN be uniquely identified, and there is no need to worry about IP addresses. A casino can tell for CERTAIN whether the same computer has been used for more than one account, so if a player lies about it, the casino is then even MORE suspicious than before.
The
OP's email seems to defend every possible "charge" the casino might produce evidence for, and it's detail itself is "suspicious". Bringing up Skrill transfers from 2007 could be an attempt to divert attention from the REAL "gotcha" that the casino has discovered. Such a reply can only come from an experienced and well educated player. I had no idea whatsoever that transfers in Neteller could have any bearing on deposits, play, and verification at a casino. I learned about this by reading the forums.
The
OP knows so much about this aspect, yet seems very naive about the best way to make a complaint.
It looks like a correct bust by GoWild, but the
OP can still
PAB if they think this is all "circumstantial", and they are an innocent victim of the multi account detection systems.
Bookmarks