SlotoCash - Very bad practice

[Nifty29]

I can understand that some discussions are not meant to be discussed publicly, but in all honestly i find it a bit strange that you are not willing to discuss this particular case with these mediators . It gives a negative vibe towards slotocash.

If by "these mediators" you mean gambling_grumbles, then you need to understand how their service differs from the PAB service.

The big difference IIRC is that gamgrum will not accept evidence from the casino in a confidential fashion. If the casino is willing to provide irrefutable proof of player fraud, but will not allow it to be made public (to protect their security processes), then gamgrum pretends it doesn't exist and will not take it into account in their report, and hence will rule in favour of the player.

It's the reason why many complaints made over there aren't submitted here, and why many reputable operators refuse to deal with them. The fraudsters are smart....they know that the operators have one hand tied behind their back over there and that they're far more likely to be pronounced innocent. Any mediation process that ignores the facts isnt worth the page its posted on IMO. I also love the part where the report contains question marks about the casinos credibility etc but still has the affiliate link there in case a reader wants to try them out . Rome casino is a perfect example...about 6 complaints in 3 months, showing a deliberate pattern of non.payment until a complaint is filed, upon which the casino acts swiftly and pays, looking like the good guys.....forget the fact they didn't pay for months for no reason. Gamgrum doesn't see a problem with that OR having max cashouts on bonus-free deposits, hence they recommend them by having an affy link next to all the complaints. It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

The complainant in the other cases against sloto won't submit a PAB here because Bryan and Maxd will see and take into account ALL the evidence the casino possesses, and they obviously realise its not going to look good for them. Quite often, complainants will distort facts or just outright lie....as in the OPs case here.....and IMO that's when they cross the border into fraudsterland. What they don't realise is that they're crapping in their own nest, as a casino is far less likely to reconsider if the OP has told porkies, which in turn makes the casino appear to be telling porkies, just to make themselves look innocent.

[casinobuzz]

I was offered to give more wagering and I accept this offer as a honest resolution under the circumstances of the issue

[chuchu59]

I was offered to give more wagering and I accept this offer as a honest resolution under the circumstances of the issue

Though you were offered a satisfactory resolution (to you) I hope this wont become the norm. You bet 6 lines and must have set them to do so. Unless Ms sloto had access to incorrect info betting over the max for 23 spins hardly amounts to an accident.

@ms sloto. If something similar crops up how do you determine how much the additional wagering will be? Total overbet amount x wr factor of the original bonus?

[kavaman]

The same complaint is elsewhere then crumbles too nifty. I dont know on how many sites exactly but atleast askgamblers . Thats a public dispute too though.

[Slotster!]

I was offered to give more wagering and I accept this offer as a honest resolution under the circumstances of the issue

Hey casinobuzz - How did you get on?

[maxd]

I was offered to give more wagering and I accept this offer as a honest resolution under the circumstances of the issue

The OP had filed a PAB hours before making this post. I'm assuming based on what was said here that the PAB is toast.