This is even WORSE than I thought.
The rep says that:-
.....we were unable to find any evidence of max cash out value being discussed or agreed upon.
This was bad enough, a material omission,
but the OP says:-
i ask him terms and conditions. he says 30 times playthrough,
i ask is there a max cashout?
he says no just a playthrough, ok i said and thank you.
This looks like the agent LIED to the player, even if through ignorance. This was a PHONE offer, and there SHOULD be a recording of such a verbal offer.
Even though not specifically covered in the rules for accreditation, there MUST surely be evidence kept of ANY offer made to a player over the phone, such as a recording, given that there is NOTHING in writing in such cases, and NOTHING also on the website covering such ND offers to EXISTING players.
There are ONLY two possibilities.
1) The OP is lying to get the money.
2) The agent screwed up, even lied to "close" the deal, and the casino management are now reneging on the offer made by it's agent.
Bryan has often cautioned players against relying on offers made over the phone, and to always "get it in writing"; however, players should NOT have to be covering all the bases when it comes to dealing with an ACCREDITED operation, there should be sufficient trust in this status that players can be confident that offers made by agents will be honoured.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks