Screen Shots that Suck!

[kimss]

And after that win I was sucked dry, followed by maxing out aswell. Oh the irony, I was upto 1700 and whopsydaisy! Should have grabbed a video of the 12 euro wagering at Glory of Rome, naked streaks are so lovely to go through! Ouch!

[juliack]

I should have held all the clubs. This cost me $20,000. Cheers

[SlotMonster]

I should have held all the clubs. This cost me $20,000. Cheers

Don't worry, julliack! Your screen isn't 'suck' because it cannot be RF in hand you posted (well, it almost cannot be RF, but probability of RF is much less than 100%, or even 5%)

[juliack]

Hi Slotmonster. If I held the queen of clubs instead of the jack of spades the next three cards dealt would have given me the Royal Flush. Cheers

[SlotMonster]

Hi Slotmonster. If I held the queen of clubs instead of the jack of spades the next three cards dealt would have given me the Royal Flush. Cheers

That is what I'm saying about! Look at the screen more attentively If you held the queen of clubs instead of the jack of spades, the next TWO CARDS (Hand-2 and Hand-3) dealt to you would have given you FOUR cards for RF. BUT you cannot guarantee that card in Hand-1 would have given to you FIFTH card for RF

[juliack]

Hi slotmonster. My understanding, correct me if I am wrong, is that each line of cards dealt has its own deck or decks dealt from. That being the case, no matter what two cards I could have held the next three cards dealt from the deck on that bottom line would be the King Ace and Ten of clubs. I am just wondering if I am missing something here. Cheers

[cyprean]

Hi slotmonster. My understanding, correct me if I am wrong, is that each line of cards dealt has its own deck or decks dealt from. That being the case, no matter what two cards I could have held the next three cards dealt from the deck on that bottom line would be the King Ace and Ten of clubs. I am just wondering if I am missing something here. Cheers

If you had held the Jc and Qc instead of Js and Jc you would have won $20k pure and simple. The next cards that came would have been the same, Ac Tc Kc.

[liquuid_fusion]

It may be annoying but at least you did the right thing. Much better to win your bet back and the chance of a bit more rather than gamble on the really really small possibility of making a royal from two held cards. I've had similar things happen to me loads of times.

[Matthew23]

Remember to produce the same three cards you would have had to hit draw at the exact same moment you did when you held the two Jacks. If you deselected the Jack and held the Queen the time difference would have meant you would have received a different random number and therefore three different cards.

[Slotster!]

Remember to produce the same three cards you would have had to hit draw at the exact same moment you did when you held the two Jacks. If you deselected the Jack and held the Queen the time difference would have meant you would have received a different random number and therefore three different cards.

Exactly... Even the milliseconds of extra time spent to hold the other cards as opposed to two would have meant different cards coming out, so don't sweat it! It's massively unlikely had you held the two-to-the-flush it would've come in...

What amazes me however is that you didn't hold them, based on the amount of Royal Flushes you've hit! I'd have thunk you always held the Flush draws on the off chance...