![]() |
![]() |
slotjunkie (10th February 2012)
jackieb7 (10th February 2012)
The reason I felt that I needed to post about the fast wire transfer, was not only that it was fast... I did not have to email back and forth and back and forth or think of calling them... I did not have to send in documents over and over or stand by my drivers liscense or even give a pint of blood. I did not have to log on to my bank every hour for a week. I have played and lost == took it like a man... I played and won.. and instead of giving me a hard time they said "congrats here is your money... come back soon".
-Jackieb
casinoboy2k (11th February 2012), Diane (10th February 2012), Jasminebed (11th February 2012), KasinoKing (11th February 2012), ksech (11th February 2012), LaHutti (11th February 2012), max1mike (10th February 2012), Nifty29 (10th February 2012), rockycatt (11th February 2012), samoas (10th February 2012), slotjunkie (10th February 2012)
Obviously slotocash realises that a vacuum exists and that there are no currently any rtgs that are top-notch. While they did encounter teething problems when they launched, they have largely overcome the problems and are set to prove they can compete with the better rtgs. They may also win over the hearts of USA players who believe they are a good alternative to CW who are occasionally having problems paying them timely and this may well count when regulation is in place. Furthermore, slotocash's bonuses seem to be targetting those of CW. There are new ones every week and they offer free chips when you have purchased certain amounts and this is similar to CW's cashback offers.Bonuses at both places are also uncashable with seemingly less harsh wrs than JC. I am sure CW will fight back though so I am keeping my fingers crossed as competition will benefit the consumers. Yes, US.
senseless gambling addict
It was actually 10 deposits, no cashouts at all, half bonuses and half no bonus taken, between $25-$50 with 400%-61% bonuses on the deposits that were with bonuses.
The most my balance has ever reached is $300. I play low, medium, high and very high variance games; caesar's empire, cleopatra's gold, derby dollars, diamond dozen, enchanted garden, fame and fortune, funky monkey, hidden riches, honey to a bee, hillbillies, mystic dragon, paradise dreams, paydirt, red sands, sunken treasure, tiger treasures, vikings voyage, white rhino and year of fortune and a few others. I guess they are majority medium variance.
And $10 bets, I bet from the minimum to no more than $2.00.
Is that better for you Nifty?
Last edited by slotjunkie; 10th February 2012 at 04:08 AM. Reason: add games I forgot
KasinoKing (11th February 2012)
Well it explains things much better, yes.
If the highest balance you had was $300, then $2 bets are quite high, especially combined with the several high variance slots you play. If that balance was reached with no bonus on a $25 deposit, or even a $50 one, its certainly a cashable amount.
You deposited fairly small amounts each time, so its not reasonable to expect to win something worthwhile very often. Most of the big screenies we see are from big depositors who have the bankroll to ride the swings. Betting according to bankroll is important, but it also means low bets if the deposits are small, and hence the expected wins are smaller.
A smaller depositor is far more likely to go many deposits without a cashout. It certainly doesn't provide any indication of RTP settings etc.
I wasn't being unfriendly, I just wanted to know what you meant.
casinoboy2k (11th February 2012), slotjunkie (10th February 2012)
and the fast payout. I have deposited several thousand and have won zero and slot bonuses don't include progressives which I tradionally do well on.
I just wish I could be so lucky at sloto, use to win frequently before they changed to RTG.
Obviously, I don't have to deposit again, but I am often "stupid" and chase my losses even when I know I should give it up trying to win back my deposits.
Not ragging on them as obviously others are winning. They are just not lucky for me. How much have those responding to comments actually deposited at Sloto; prior to and after they became RTG? Really, I don't think it is helpful for anyone to comment if they have no first-hand play experience at the casino. Some of us want to hear what kind of payout others have had. Thats all.
AFAIK it isn't a requirement for posting that a member must be a depositor, either past or present. I actually think that stating that some people's opinions are more important than others is far more unhelpful than anything a non-depositor posts, and IMO it is moderating, which is neither your right nor mine.
Sloto uses the same software as hundreds of other casinos, do playing at one is the same as playing at another, except for promotions and their relevant terms. Anyone and everyone can post their opinion. Have you considered that not everyone that posts is doing so to "help" you? Just take on board what you want and ignore the rest.
It's a personal choice whether members want to reveal their deposit status, and their choice to invoke their right to privacy should not preclude them from contributing to the thread.
I agree, and would like to add the following: There is a /lot/ of information on this board. And it is exactly as Douglas Adams said (I am paraphrasing, I believe!) : "Humans are unique in the universe for their ability to learn from the mistakes of others; and their apparent disinclination to do so."
From what I've read, Slotocash seems like a place I'd deposit, if I was eligible to do so.![]()
Last edited by Surasanji; 11th February 2012 at 05:15 AM. Reason: Added Quotes around the quote!
Bookmarks