![]() |
![]() |
I'm confused Nifty.. Bryan had a recent news article (or Youtube broadcast) -- within the last 2 months where I specifically remember him talking about a player hitting an RJ and fighting the casino because the player felt he was entitled to the winnings since it's pooled money by players -- and not part of the casino's money. We've also heard and read time and time again that the casino has no right to keep the winnings if the player hits on a Max Cashout. Why should the casino win the money just because their RTG software isn't smart enough to keep the RJ from going off on a Max Cashout?
At the very least, they should return 100% of the RJ back into the Pool and preferrably pay the player. The Max Cashout imho is meant for a Maximum amount the Casino has to pay... since the RJ is built mostly on non-casino funds (maybe $1000 max is casino), they should payout all or most of it even on a Max Cashout.
If the casino confiscates a high # of these each month, do they report a lower RTP? Are we sure that when we read on the RTG casino websites about Random Jackpot winners, that each person actually rec'd that money -- meaning it wasn't remove via Max Cashout?
These are the types of things an auditor via Federal Regulations would inquire about, but I just don't know who's regulating RTG casinos these days.
Inetbet, Highnoon, JackpotCapital all have earned my trust and have great managers -- but just not sure how this works and whether the casino managers truly have freedom of full-disclosure like we see at 3dice.com. And don't get me started on 60x wagering at JackpotCapital even for those of us at VIP Platinum.... yikes!
Bookmarks