
Originally Posted by
Tirilej
I finally got at least one of the reasons for them changing the pendingtime.
They are saying that the players are recycling their money, wich is a costly process for both the players and the casino.
I know that if I make a cashout I go on and deposit again, that's true, but doesn't the casino want their money back?
For me it doesn't cost a cent to deposit or cashout so I can never lose with a fast cashout. I just pay it back faster.
So how much does it costs for the casinos? If it's a businessdecision, are they doing so bad?
Would they prefer player deposit it elsewhere rather than back with them? I am sure that if they discussed this with their players, they would agree not to redeposit for, say, 96 business hours from making their withdrawal, and would play elsewhere during that time in exchange for a return to faster payment.
Perhaps they should ask WHY players recycle their money. Perhaps they pay them, and then straight away send them an irresistable new offer that they make sure expires "today" in order to hurry them into redepositing.
They could deal with this by not sending players who have just withdrawn any new offers until a few days have passed. This would discourage recycling.
Another cause of recycling is the max cashout restriction. With these recycling is mandatory, players CANNOT play on even if they have completed the WR on the chip. They MUST go through the somewhat pointless process of withdrawing, receiving it, and recycling purely to be able to play on with the same balance, but with the max cashout restriction removed.
Funily enough, we here at CM have been telling casinos using max cashout rules that this will inevitably lead to higher processing costs because they insist that players withdraw and redeposit in order to carry on playing.
As said before "We told you so"
(but would RTG and Rival listen - of course not, they knew better).
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks