RJ wierdness at Jackpotcapital

**takethemoney** · 3rd June 2010, 07:15 AM

Originally Posted by all4greed

Not true according to the Rushmore group feeds...

Random Jackpots aside, where are the people who just want to deposit $100 or $200 and win 100 or 200...... or win a a grand? I guess everyone is playing for RJs and losing if they don't hit one.

**KasinoKing** · 3rd June 2010, 11:37 AM

Originally Posted by WonderingSpirit

2. And why would we question the fairness when we win? Players are not unfair when we win once in a while. If we won on all our deposits, then we could start questioning the fairness of winning. But that will never happen, so why would we question it? Makes no sense.

I think the point zap was trying to make is that players complain when they get a return which is only 50% of expected RTP, but don't complain when they get 150%.

It's a sort of "double standards" issue;
If you're getting only half the RTP "the game must be unfair",
But if you're getting double the RTP "the game is totally fair!"
Funny that...

KK

**all4greed** · 3rd June 2010, 08:32 PM

Originally Posted by takethemoney

Random Jackpots aside, where are the people who just want to deposit $100 or $200 and win 100 or 200...... or win a a grand? I guess everyone is playing for RJs and losing if they don't hit one.

The feeds show other wins, not just RJ's. Whose to say there aren't smaller wins (under 1k), just not reported. Appears the Rushmore group does have quite many good size winners and some hit nice wins consistently.

**eu_lowroller** · 4th June 2010, 01:32 AM

now i've experienced a very funny thing.

i used now a bonus (60%) because i got an email that i'm now a VIP silver player, so i tried the bonus out and guess what, since that i have so much playtime and i got so many bonus rounds, so i made only a $20 deposit and got a full balance of $32 and could wager a little bit about $500 but then i certainly lost the money.

but that was not all, because after that i used my 2nd bonus, which was also a 60% and started again with a $32 balance, after depositing my $20 and could again wager about $500 and have a playtime about some hours before i busted out, so why does this now only happen, when i use a bonus and not, when i make deposits which are much higher and with my own money, without any bonus?

but it's certainyl again only randomness

**takethemoney** · 4th June 2010, 03:27 AM

Originally Posted by eu_lowroller

now i've experienced a very funny thing.

i used now a bonus (60%) because i got an email that i'm now a VIP silver player, so i tried the bonus out and guess what, since that i have so much playtime and i got so many bonus rounds, so i made only a $20 deposit and got a full balance of $32 and could wager a little bit about $500 but then i certainly lost the money.

but that was not all, because after that i used my 2nd bonus, which was also a 60% and started again with a $32 balance, after depositing my $20 and could again wager about $500 and have a playtime about some hours before i busted out, so why does this now only happen, when i use a bonus and not, when i make deposits which are much higher and with my own money, without any bonus?

but it's certainyl again only randomness

I wish I knew if the slots were tighter with a bonus, vs. no bonus. I've lost 76 deposits now and all except 4 have been with a bonus. The bonuses have been between 100% and 200%. I never figured a bonus of 50 or 60%, where you have to wager 25 or 30 x on all of it made much sense. Just never seemed right to expose 100% of your money to a WR for a bonus that was much less than the deposit. But....what the hell do I know?

My way hasn't been working lately. It used to work quite well.