The stupodity of this rule was illustrated a while ago in a player dispute with the Palace Group. They voided a withdrawal, but argued it was a SMALLER wager at the end of a losing streak that was the violation, and not far BIGGER wagers early on.
The stupidity is again demonstrated in this example over a paltry $5 balance. What if the $2.50 bet lost, the next would have to be $1.25, and then 62c, 31c, etc...... otherwise the rule would be breached. It would technically be IMPOSSIBLE to bust out without making an "irregular bet" as the last one, which might WIN, and start a winning streak.
Palace group saw sense, and changed the rule to 25% of STARTING bonus balance, so that at some point, when your entire balance dropped to 25% of the initial bonus granted, you COULD make one last bet and either win, or bust out.
Canbet could do this, or limit the rule to balances above a certain level so as to avoid impractically small bets being made.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks