
Originally Posted by
JHV
Sorry chuchu59, this is the 3rd time in the last hour I've read a post of yours where you're clearly either in the wrong or perhaps you don't understand the complexities of the situation.
This player's concern is completely valid. If he requests that the w/d be flushed so that he doesn't gamble it away one night or w/e, then to not do so is pure unethical behaviour from the casino.
I'm not saying Cherry Red are behaving unethically here - just speaking in general terms as someone who's been badly burned by a casino intentionally stringing out my w/d request over a period of time, even lying to me in the hope I would gamble those funds away (which I did).
Not all of us have your self-control chuchu59. Put yourself in the other guy's shoes in these spots. Whilst it would be unfair to even compare Cherry Red's failure to flush the w/d with what happened in my situation, if it turns out that the player has requested those funds be flushed pending withdrawal - and they are left sitting in his account - that's very poor form and deserving of criticism / sanction(s) of some kind.
Thanks. I would dearly love to know which other 2 posts I am clearly wrong at.
Yup! I would also like to be in the other guy's shoes, at least for the $30K he has won.
By the way, I hate complex matters as my brain hurts easily.
senseless gambling addict
Bookmarks