LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Hi KasinoKing,
I followed your SlotBeater strategy and lost a lot of money.
I took it to a friend of mine who studied Maths A (very simple maths) in Grade 9 and he says children are able to understand that there actually isn't any 'strategy' here at all.
He said that you're basically advertising a 'strategy' that is a fallacy. He pointed out that you even contradict yourself in the 'strategy' article when you say that every spin in random - but then appear to be advising a Martingale approach to wagering.
I had to Google Martingale - and, although I'm not very bright (Pops needed help on the farm so I never did get no fancy book-learning), it seems to me that this 'strategy' is not really a 'strategy' at all. It's a pile of hooey, really. That's how it seems to me, anyway.
Can I bother you for an explanation - perhaps I'm missing something. I've read the article 4 times word for word and can't see how it's anything but nonsense shabbily dressed as 'strategy'.
Following your 'strategy' - I have lost a great deal of money. If it turns out that you actually are commercially advertising fraudulently, my friend says that recent changes in UK legislation means you can get in a lot of trouble for doing that - even prison time!
I wasn't sure if you were aware of that - and thought it best to warn you as, even though your strategy appears to be a lot of hooey designed to take advantage of those not gifted in mathematics - I wouldn't like the po-po to win.
My friend asked me why Bryan allows you to advertise such a fraudulent 'strategy' in your sig here on CasinoMeister. I explained that Bryan is simply too busy to monitor these things. My friend suggested I email Bryan about this - and I thought it was a bang-up idea - that way, nobody is publicly embarrassed, and the offending and deceiving material could be removed from a forum which is supposed to be a Player Advocate forum.
I did that some time ago.
And yet your sig advertising slots as being beatable remains.
My friend said he doesn't think this site is really about Player Advocacy at all, if this kind of thing is allowed to happen. I told him to stop speaking rubbish - he clearly has no idea what he's talking about and I apologise for his rude assumptions.
But you will pay me back for all the money I lost if I can prove that your Slot Beating strategy is not actually a strategy at all, right? I will, of course, have independent assessors look over this 'strategy' and determine it's validity.
Of course, all that is probably not necessary. I'm sure I'm just doing something wrong. But I would like your personal guarantee that I didn't just lose a whole heap of money on a fraudulent lie - it would be good if you put your reputation behind that actually. Something like:
I, KasinoKing, put my reputation behind the SlotBeater strategy I advertise. If found to be fraudulent as a 'strategy' for beating House Advantage, I will pull down all my fraudulent sites from the web and refund all the money I have made from pimping out this strategy to unsuspecting players who aren't experienced gamblers or who don't have a strong mathematical background.
Surely this is only reasonable.
Sincerely,
JHV.
---------
(Don't get up Max, I'll show myself to the door.)
Originally Posted by KasinoKing
Bookmarks