Oliver Curran says that if you read read this forum, he does not want your business

**Casinomeister** · 12th January 2004, 03:14 PM

It needs to be a clear cut case of a non-payment with no chance of the casino to dance around any vague rules of promo-abuse or whatever. As soon as a "promo" or "bonus" enters the equation, the upperhand belongs to the casino.

I believe Warren is too slick to allow this to occur. Since he knows once this happens he's out of a job.

**jetset** · 12th January 2004, 04:43 PM

He would probably just pick another alias, another software provider and a new casino and would carry on abusing the playing public. Look at his past history...

Rated Player (Innoco) failed Warren Cloud

Casino Extreme, Heat et al (RTG) Richard Brooks, Mr X. *Removed*.

Crystal Palace et al (RTG) Don Fortune, Oliver C.....TVS....

?? What next?

**Casinomeister** · 14th January 2004, 10:17 AM

Well, it looks like I have upset Warren a little bit. He emailed me a number of times yesterday refuting some of the things I have said. I stand my ground, but I did make one comment I wish to retract:

Warren knows that it could take one phone call--and he's history.

He mentioned in an email:

Bryan I quote your pearls of wisdom here thin ice are you out of your mind make 1 million calls and see if you can "pull the plug" LMAO
... DONT EVER SAY 1 CALL AND I AM DONE you dont have a
clue

So I will take this opportunity to rephrase this:

"It will take more than one call reporting fraudulent casino activity to RTG, it will take a million calls. (US) 404-459-4263"

Anyway, he has also accused me of being Chucho's friend Chris stating: Also quite frankly that menial attempt emailing Oliver from a dummy account to get attention to the matter that you have blacklisted us I dont blame him for his response.

Which I responded to: This indicates to me that you or "Oliver" routinely lie as part of your business. You know I didn't send you any emails except the ones from my Casinomeister account. There is no reason why I would need to bring attention to any rogue listing except through my own resources; newsletter, webcast, hard print articles, and forum members.

Today's webcast should be up within the hour.

**Casinomeister** · 14th January 2004, 11:44 AM

http://www.casinomeister.com/radio_show.html

**dropdead1** · 14th February 2008, 05:36 PM

Ok so I know this is an old thread but check this out!

http://www.poker3k.net/silversands-site-or-ego-trip

**Slotster!** · 14th February 2008, 06:11 PM

That's some impressive thread necro-ing!

**mush** · 14th February 2008, 07:32 PM

Originally Posted by Casinomeister

Well, it looks like I have upset Warren a little bit. He emailed me a number of times yesterday refuting some of the things I have said. I stand my ground, but I did make one comment I wish to retract:

He mentioned in an email:

So I will take this opportunity to rephrase this:

"It will take more than one call reporting fraudulent casino activity to RTG, it will take a million calls. (US) 404-459-4263"

Anyway, he has also accused me of being Chucho's friend Chris stating: Also quite frankly that menial attempt emailing Oliver from a dummy account to get attention to the matter that you have blacklisted us I dont blame him for his response.

Which I responded to: This indicates to me that you or "Oliver" routinely lie as part of your business. You know I didn't send you any emails except the ones from my Casinomeister account. There is no reason why I would need to bring attention to any rogue listing except through my own resources; newsletter, webcast, hard print articles, and forum members.

Today's webcast should be up within the hour.

does anyone else find the fact that he is commenting on things he read on this forum insanely hilarious based on this comment from his email - "The fact that you even read the Casino Meister forum indicates to me that, like the majority of people who read that site, you are not the caliber of player we are interested in having as a member." LOL

it looks like they just want them as employees, not members......

**winbig** · 14th February 2008, 07:38 PM

Originally Posted by mush

it looks like they just want them as employees, not members......

If that were the case, then they would actually pay people that followed their T&C to the letter, instead of claiming the FU clause for the sole reason that they won too much.

**same_old** · 15th February 2008, 07:58 AM

Hi Bryan,

So when you go to the ICE-meeting's etc, have you ever come across Oliver or any other casino manager's from the rouged casino's ?... if so how do the conversations go??.

Do you go with a list of customer complaints and lug them on his lap????..
I bet this is where the real conversations take place....