BetVoyager's Multiball Roulette: more balls - more fun!

**SlotMonster** · 1st August 2009, 07:10 PM

I've tried it, and was totally impressed by this game!

**Wisenheimer** · 5th August 2009, 04:40 PM

That's a pretty cool idea. I don't think I've seen that anywhere else.

**SlotMonster** · 5th August 2009, 07:07 PM

Originally Posted by Wisenheimer

That's a pretty cool idea. I don't think I've seen that anywhere else.

Sure you haven't

This game is absolutely unique!

**Wisenheimer** · 23rd August 2009, 04:05 PM

Has anyone tried this (besides SlotMonster)?

No offense, mr. slotmonster, appreciate your thoughts

, but I just want to hear if anybody else has opinions.

**love2winalot** · 23rd August 2009, 06:58 PM

Hiya. Even in the USA, you can play the Demo Mode of this game. I just did. Following is my view of this game...........as though anyone cares......

I made $61 net profit in 10 spins.
This is, "ALMOST", like playing 3 tables at the same time, in a real Casino. The Difference being, that, "Only 1 ball can land on any given #". So, unlike a real Casino, you could not have the #17, hit on 2 of the 3 tables you were playing.

First off, BetVoyager will make a killing with this game. In General, most players will just lose three times as fast. Here is Why. You take $99 to the table. Woo Hoo, i have a good bankroll. Ummmm, No you Don't. You actually only have $33 on each the 3 balls. You have to have the bankroll, as if you were actually playing at 3 different tables. Most do not, or would not do this.

Next. Bet Selection. "I will bet the first dozen". Fine, the numbers, 5-22-34, hit. You won the bet on the #5, and lost the other 2, and thus Won a Bet and made 0 profit.

You need a x3 bankroll to play this game.

Now, the question that Begs to be asked is this. "Does this game have a flaw, knowing that you have to have 3 different numbers hit each time"?

Who the hell knows, but since i am moving oversea's in a few months, I know somebody who is gonna find out?....

**Jasminebed** · 24th August 2009, 06:08 AM

Sound cool for those who bet single numbers. You can lose more faster, so good for the casino.

I think adjusting your bet size accordingly is good advice.

**DaveG39** · 24th August 2009, 06:40 AM

I tried this game and it makes my brain hurt.

For example, my normal betting pattern in roulette is the following: 1 chip on double line 1-6, 2 chips on each of the double lines 10-15 & 28-33 and 1 chip on the corner 17-18-20-21. Since I was playing 3 balls, I was using $3 chips, so $18 total. Numbers that came up were 17 (win), 24 (lose), and 32 (win). The machine says the payout totals 21 and net profit is 3 for the spin. I can't figure out how this can be right.

If I was playing 3 seperate tables, I would win 9 on the 17 (24-3-6-6), win 18 on the 32 (30-6-3-3) and lose 18 on the 24 giving me a payout of 27 and a net of 9.

**love2winalot** · 24th August 2009, 07:11 AM

hehehe, Yea i was confused at first also. You have to read the rules of the game. Assuming you are playing 3 balls, you will notice that the available chips to choose from are a multiple of 3.-- .30, 1.50, 3.00, 15.00, and so on.

The game then takes your $ bet amount, and divides it by 3. Thus, Betting $3 on the 0, is NOT Betting $3 on the 0, but is instead betting $1 on the 0, three times. $1for the first ball, $1 for the second ball, and $1 for the third ball. Since only 1 ball can land on a number, the most you would win is $33, and not $105.

Using 3 balls, everything becomes a multiple of 3. Example, bet $5 on four different numbers. You are betting on 4 numbers for each ball. 4x3=12. So you are getting paid as though you were betting on 12 numbers.

So, you are betting $3 on your four faviorate numbers. Total bet is $12. One of your number hit. Do you know what you get paid? You get paid $36, for a net gain of $24. Just as if you had bet $12 on a single dozen at normal roulette.

Like i posted earlier, this game will eat up your bankroll in a hurry, and is very confusing if you do not stop and do the math. DEMO MODE IT until you have it down, and understand it completely.

**KasinoKing** · 24th August 2009, 10:09 AM

Wow that is complicated - I think I'll give it a miss.

WagerWorks new 3-wheel Roulette seems much better. You only have one ball but the 3 rings spin differently and you CAN hit the same number 2 or 3 times in one spin.

A few days ago I had a "few quid kicking around" in my Boyle's casino account, so had a little dabble on their new game;
My favorite numbers, as you can see, are 5,14,17 & 26. Started with small bets and gradually got bigger. 5 had not hit at all in 30-ish spins, so I lumped a load more chips round it. Finally it did hit, but I let the bets ride... next spin I got a double; 26 & 17, and two goes later I got the triple whammy!

Don't know if you can see it clearly, but I hit 5, 26 & 17 all in one spin!

**love2winalot** · 24th August 2009, 04:59 PM

Hiya. For those interested, the rules at Boyle casino using 3 wheels, is a better choice than the 3 balls at betvoyager. However, i can not prove it as betvoyager lets you play the demo mode, and Boyles blocks it if you are in the USA.

Just the fact that you could get a number to hit more than once, this alone, makes 3 wheels, better than 3 balls. Both games use the same multiple of 3 as regards to a bet, and the payout.

Boy, I can't wait to leave here so i can play these games.........