This is probably a silly question that I already know the answer to, but I was just reading a thread praising gowild casino(thread name is "WTG Gowild Casino") and read this. The topic creator said that they were excellent because they removed a bonus for him even after he had used some of the money from the bonus to gamble with. He had won money, and now didn't need to fulfill wagering requirements, so he was happy with their service, as I'm sure anyone would be. Theres more detail as to why, but you can read the thread for that, as this is enough information to explain why I have this question.
Now based on the way he worded things, he made it sound as if it was normal to remove a bonus from an account as long as the actual bonus money was not used. In the situation above, he had dipped into the bonus money before winning, which is why he was surprised they would still remove the bonus for him. But he seemed like it wouldn't be out of the ordinary to remove it had he won right off the bat and not used any of the bonus to gamble with.
As far as I know, I don't believe a casino will remove a bonus and get rid of wagering requirements just because you didnt actually need the bonus money. Am I wrong, and they do normally do this if you ask? I thought once you start playing after taking a bonus, you are locked into fulfilling the wagering requirements, regardless if you go lower than your acutal deposit or not. It seems like it would be too good to be true if you were allowed to not fulfill wagering if you win right away, so if this is normal at some casinos please let me know.
Thanks in advance for any info.




LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

Reply With Quote





)

Bookmarks