
Originally Posted by
chuchu59
Thanks for giving your views. As it is I didnt really know the cashout limit was 10x until I checked my casino account and saw the $50 sitting there. I am sure you know what you are doing but when you say that I should not have requested more than 10x the bonus, I beg to differ. Besides being unaware of the 10x cashout limit, I always request the max withdrawable amount in my account. It states $102 in the cashier so I request it. They can, if they want, remove any winnings they deem as excess when they process the 'correct amount' to my ecocard account. Actually, I am not arguing about the 10x limit but there are varied ways of initiating withdrawals and just because I am requesting the $102 withdrawable amount in my account I am told that I had erred. As I said earlier, they admit that they can only remove excess winnings on a successful withdrawal and by this they mean that the $50 is reversed to my account and now they say the rules are very clear. If it were successful, the funds would have been in my ecocard account. Hence, it wasnt successful.
This entire mess was brought about by a tendency to reverse withdrawals, something that benefits the casino, which is why players are always advised NEVER to reverse a withdrawal once they have decided they want to cash-out.
The business of the errant $20 is a contradiction, and means that Ecocard WILL acccept an "adjusted" amount - in this case, the $20 was an error, but as far as Ecocard are concerned it was an "adjustment", so why could a similar process not have worked with the $102, sending $50 to Ecocard using the same process as was used for the errant $20, with the remaining $52 being reversed to the account, and subsequently removed using the "managers withdrawal" (this is how RTG handles a "confiscation" of part or all of a balance, the wording used by the system makes it confusing).
IF a non-standard procedure applied for Ecocard, a good casino would be expected as a matter of courtesy to send the player an email with instructions as to how to handle the procedure.
Since the total was $102, and the withdrawal was simply reversed by the casino, the outcome is the same as if the player had never requested a withdrawal, and surely the max cashout is STILL $50, so the removed $52, less $2, should still be in play.
None of this would happen with MGS, since they can afford NOT to riddle their offers with max cashout restrictions. I have NEVER seen an explanation as to why RTG necessarily MUST have these max cashout restrictions or "go out of business", yet MGS casinos with no max cashouts on free chips are for the most part still very much IN business. The bonuses offered by Inetbet are even LESS than those offered by many MGS casinos, so for me, the numbers just don't add up, and I view the max cashout as simply a mechanism to bolster the bottom line, but one that is rarely noticed by players, since achieving 10x bankroll is not all that easy to do when betting with a "recreational" strategy.
Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
Back to port for unloading.
Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.
Bookmarks