Online Casinos - Casinomeister Logo Online Casinos - Casinomeister
Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567
Results 61 to 66 of 66

Thread: Thinking somethings changed at Microgaming

  1. #61
    tim5ny is offline Quit Gambling
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    2,339
    Thanks
    306
    Thanked 1,027 Times in 500 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1432
    I don't know? Back in the day when I could play Microgaming......most of the times it wasn't pretty. This is long before the U.S. ban. Sure..there were great hits along the way to a final loss, but I doubt that's changed. The next session you have might be a banner one! Let's not forget who has the advantage in this game overall. For the player, losing is the mathematical guarantee, and the certainties of math are just as solid as the laws of gravity. Are you having fun though??

  2. #62
    vinylweatherman's Avatar
    vinylweatherman is offline Typus Infinitus Achievements:
    Veteran50000 Experience PointsOverdrivePeople Likes You
    Awards:
    Frequent PosterCommunity AwardMost Popular
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    United Kingdom
    Posts
    10,795
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 6,844 Times in 3,671 Posts
    Rep Power
    271
    Reputation Points: 37443
    Quote Originally Posted by RobWin View Post
    Share your thoughts on this vinyl...
    I already did

    I examined a slot in great detail, and found it to be far more "authentic" a reproduction of the real thing than I expected to find online in what is supposedly RANDOM software.

    A few other brave players tried some of my ideas, but got their fingers burned, so decided the game was shite.

    I have continued my play, on and off, and with all the other games at MG seeming to have turned bad, I played this certain game more and more.

    I have had a few recent sessions where I have won more than I put in, then a dry spell when it played badly, but now it seems to have improved somewhat.

    May just be down to luck, as MG would tell us, but if I have "found something", I can expect "problems" with my withdrawals
    Empty Fruities Astern Capt'n
    Back to port for unloading.
    Full Sails - before we get raided ourselves.

  3. #63
    RobWin is offline closed account
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    A Vault!
    Posts
    6,137
    Thanks
    7,434
    Thanked 4,338 Times in 2,278 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 23468
    Quote Originally Posted by vinylweatherman View Post
    I already did

    I examined a slot in great detail, and found it to be far more "authentic" a reproduction of the real thing than I expected to find online in what is supposedly RANDOM software.

    A few other brave players tried some of my ideas, but got their fingers burned, so decided the game was shite.

    I have continued my play, on and off, and with all the other games at MG seeming to have turned bad, I played this certain game more and more.

    I have had a few recent sessions where I have won more than I put in, then a dry spell when it played badly, but now it seems to have improved somewhat.

    May just be down to luck, as MG would tell us, but if I have "found something", I can expect "problems" with my withdrawals
    Ok,,, I think I do recall what you are talking about now when I remember awhile back you were posting regarding your results...

  4. #64
    kimss is offline Dormant account
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    721
    Thanks
    132
    Thanked 543 Times in 234 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 2887
    Quote Originally Posted by Rusty View Post
    If it was corrupt there would be no way to beat it.
    It could simply calculate total payout on all 37 numbers in a fraction of a second and return the lowest paying one.
    Of course such a blatant cheat would be very quickly discovered so any cheats would be far more sophisticated (if they existed)
    My thoughts excactly. By now most people know I have my theory on how this works, and you can stack layers on layers here with different mechanics which make the end result. To put it simple I belive this is what is going on.

    By default - the system works the way it's supposed to work. Then, after x spins, the 95% payout flattening model is activated. This means that above 95% and the system will serve you randomly bad sessions. Below randomly good ones. In simple terms, all the system needs to do is make you not get that 1 win which would have made a difference! And, the other way, when things is to bad - infact so bad that it makes you wonder - you magically get that great streak again so you can't complain.

    I believe there are no way to beat the system, except being lucky since the system is made for 95%.

    Explaining myself in further detail would take a days work, and I would probably end up with 10 pages of numbers, programming lines and graphs, just to make my point clearly.

    The annoying thing - it's just to easy creating a rigged system that is impossible to detect! And I am talking slots now - that is very important to remember!

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to kimss For This Useful Post:

    Rusty (25th September 2008)

  6. #65
    Rusty is offline Banned User - repetitive flaming Achievements:
    VeteranCreated Album pictures50000 Experience PointsPeople Likes You
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Manchester UK
    Posts
    2,842
    Thanks
    3,101
    Thanked 2,135 Times in 1,027 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 12043
    We are definately of the same opinion here Kimss and I don't think it is a coincidence that we both have a knowledge of computer programming.

    We have both come to the same conlusion independently although we can never say the exact mechanics that are being used to "throttle" the payoyts because there are simply to many possible ways to achieve this.

    I do not see the slots as "rigged" as I believe there is always a random element involved it is just that these results are skewed/weighted call it what you will and that this weighting is in itself dynamic.
    For those that are less technically minded, think of it as a slider that slides down after a very good payout and up after a very poor session thus regulating your play.
    The slider could aslo be slid right down so you win barely anything and then right up so you just keep hitting to create an artificial streak in order to make the games more excciting.

    Any of this seem familiar to the way your slots play?

    Maybe we should not complain, after all on a truely random slot you could have horrendous session after horrendous session without getting any fun or payback but then you would probably never play again.

    On the flip side you could hit a streak of big wins that put you well infront of your overall deposits, imagine a Whale hitting a streak like that, goodnight Casino!

  7. #66
    tim5ny is offline Quit Gambling
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    2,339
    Thanks
    306
    Thanked 1,027 Times in 500 Posts
    Rep Power
    0
    Reputation Points: 1432
    Quote Originally Posted by kimss View Post
    My thoughts excactly. By now most people know I have my theory on how this works, and you can stack layers on layers here with different mechanics which make the end result. To put it simple I belive this is what is going on.

    By default - the system works the way it's supposed to work. Then, after x spins, the 95% payout flattening model is activated. This means that above 95% and the system will serve you randomly bad sessions. Below randomly good ones. In simple terms, all the system needs to do is make you not get that 1 win which would have made a difference! And, the other way, when things is to bad - infact so bad that it makes you wonder - you magically get that great streak again so you can't complain.

    I believe there are no way to beat the system, except being lucky since the system is made for 95%.

    Explaining myself in further detail would take a days work, and I would probably end up with 10 pages of numbers, programming lines and graphs, just to make my point clearly.

    The annoying thing - it's just to easy creating a rigged system that is impossible to detect! And I am talking slots now - that is very important to remember!
    So you're saying that they love our money more than they love us? Ouch!! And I thought my good looks and charm would grant me a win or two!

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to tim5ny For This Useful Post:

    Rusty (25th September 2008)

Page 7 of 7 FirstFirst ... 567

Similar Threads

  1. am i thinking too much?
    By oldandboring40 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 31st August 2007, 01:20 PM
  2. Somethings afoot?
    By Rusty in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25th February 2007, 02:45 PM
  3. i was just thinking
    By reda in forum Other Complaints
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 16th February 2007, 02:45 AM
  4. I was just thinking
    By lucky21 in forum Online Casinos
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 24th July 2006, 08:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Legal Statements and Privacy Policy
Casinomeister.com does not intend for any of the information contained on this website to be used for illegal purposes. You must ensure you meet all age and other regulatory requirements before entering a casino or placing a wager. Online gambling is illegal in many jurisdictions and users should consult legal counsel regarding the legal status of online gambling and gaming in their jurisdictions. The information in this site is for news and entertainment purposes only. Casinomeister.com is an independent directory and information service free of any gaming operator's control. Links to third party websites on Casinomeister.com are provided solely for informative/educational purposes. If you use these links, you leave this Website.