CASINOS TURN OFF SWITCH

wayram

Dormant account
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Location
Australia
I am totally convinced that the casinos have a turn off switch, a couple of examples...playing at a very reputable MG casino and had a good win on the weekender of 1600 and turned that into 2800, silly me thought that i wont pull it out i will play a little higher and maybe build it up, but no, OFF GOES THE SWITCH and no matter what denomination i played i got tiddly squat and blew the lot over a couple of days..Should have withdrew.. Same casino about a week later put in 100 and built it to 1000, smarter this time withdrew 500 and guess what, OFF GOES THE SWITCH, and over 2 nights blew the other 500 again getting NOTHING worth while on any game. My wife had a the same experience with another MG casino, withdrew 700 from 1300 and BANG, off went the switch and couldn't get anything on any game she played, It seems that IF you are lucky enough to get something , if you play on, the SWITCH goes off, and if you withdraw that is also a sin and the switch goes off. This seems to happen at all of the MG casinos that i play. Any one else had a similiar experience ?
 

wayram

Dormant account
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Location
Australia
I forgot to add that my wife and i will be doing it different from now on, If we are lucky enough to have a reasonable win we will withdraw the LOT. We will then not play at that casino for at least a week and play at another hoping that they turn the switch back on. At least it is worth a try...........:thumbsup:
 

Audioz

Banned User
Joined
Feb 21, 2008
Location
Austria
That's very normal, because always after a big win, you'll get after that nearly nothing, but that's random ;)

So if you get a bigger win, make directly a cashout, because i made the same error and believed, that i could get much more, but after that i always loosed back my money to the casino :(
 

lauram

Dormant account
Joined
Feb 18, 2008
Location
toronto
I use to get up there and do the same keep playing thinking more will hit then nothing left to take out. So now i do my reg deposits depending on casino im a low roller though. So my deposits are between 20 and 50. If i double up or triple up i withdraw and move to next casino. Last week i couldnt do anything wrong i had withdraws all over the place in each casino i deposited. This week its like as you said cant hit a thing only few features i had paid close to nothing. Its like they just all go sour. I would prefer a casino that at least if you hit a feature gave you longer play time but its not fun when all you hit is dead spin after dead spin. So far past few days mg rtg rivals are all like on that off switch button.
 

funky_seagull

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Location
scotland
I don't know if there is an on/off switch. But recently I have been doing dire at mg casinos. Its not just the slots but the table games are dead. Winning nothing in 3card poker. The blackjack is awful. I am lucky if I can win 1 game in 5. All the mg games I play are ridiculously hard. I think maybe I have hit one of the worst losing streaks ever. The only thing which I can seem to do ok in is the live dealer baccarat, the live roulette is too expensive, and they dont offer live blackjack. In frustration I wonder if there is a dodgy scrougeRNG seed and you just have to wait patiently for the more genourous seed to be loaded into the program. But this is probably not true. I think in reality i had a winning streak but it has gone now and i have lost faith in my ability to win at casinos anymore. I thought maybe just play the free slot tournaments to feed the need but without the greed, but the free tournaments are not really free if you want to win, as it seems the only way you have any chance of winning them is if you buy the continues. And stupidly I did this and felt annoyed with myself, because it was a waste of money and I should know better. I am starting to feel it is time to quit gambling altogether. I don't seem to have the self control needed to succeed anymore which is scary and makes me wonder if I'm developing a problem. Best to quit now before i end up in serious debt.

I am uneasy with RNG's. I have been seriously skanked lately. I don't think anyone is cheating, but computers are too good to play against as opponents. it feels like maybe they have A.I. That learns about your style of play and adapts itself to it over time, but it is more likely that random number generators by their nature are impossible to beat. I tend to mainly play live games now as i do seem to do slightly better in them, but even in these the losses at times can be great and to be honest I wish I hadn't started gambling. I think maybe it is time to quit and do something better with my time and money. But this could be the ramblings of a paranoid lunatic who is a sore loser and should know better than to let a bloody machine kick my arse.
 
Last edited:

james01

Dormant account
Joined
May 13, 2007
Location
Germany
I don't know if there's really anything untoward going on, but I'm kind of suspicious. I would totally drop a casino where all the games went dead on me after a good win.
 

Jufo

Dormant Account
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Location
Finland
Suppose you deposit 100$ to the casino and play the lowest house-edge game such as Classic blackjack and manage to turn that $100 into $1000 with 1 in 10 chance. The question is: Do you still have the same 1 in 10 chance of turning that already won $1000 into $10000 or does some mechanism (switch) activate in order for the casino to not lose too much?

The thing is that random games don't have memory. It shouldn't matter how much you have won in the past, you still have the exactly same chances of winning as when you started.

It would be nice to see some data of these cases where the odds have supposedly turned against the player. Enough data would show whether the odds were true or manipulated by the software.
 

funky_seagull

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Location
scotland
Here is one session from last night I will copy and paste for you.


This is my last session on double exposure blackjack. I was using a martingale, which is admittedly not a good system to use. But I decided to try it out of desperation due to failing miserable using flat betting and the double up if you win strategy, it doesn't seem to matter what system you use eventually the tables get turned on you and you hit a cold patch of constant losses.

As you can see it started off quite well, with me winning, and then suddenly tails off into disaster with me losing 9 games in a row and my entire bankroll.

7596 View 7/6/2008 2:13:48 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7597 View 7/6/2008 2:14:22 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7598 View 7/6/2008 2:14:35 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7599 View 7/6/2008 2:14:52 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7600 View 7/6/2008 2:15:09 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7601 View 7/6/2008 2:15:22 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00
7602 View 7/6/2008 2:16:14 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $8.00 $16.00
7603 View 7/6/2008 2:16:28 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7604 View 7/6/2008 2:16:40 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00
7605 View 7/6/2008 2:16:55 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $4.00 $8.00
7606 View 7/6/2008 2:17:14 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $2.00
7607 View 7/6/2008 2:17:29 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $2.00
7608 View 7/6/2008 2:18:17 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7609 View 7/6/2008 2:18:27 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7610 View 7/6/2008 2:18:41 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $2.00
7611 View 7/6/2008 2:18:54 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $2.00
7612 View 7/6/2008 2:19:06 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7613 View 7/6/2008 2:19:17 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7614 View 7/6/2008 2:19:27 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7615 View 7/6/2008 2:19:49 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7616 View 7/6/2008 2:19:59 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7617 View 7/6/2008 2:20:15 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7618 View 7/6/2008 2:20:21 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $4.00
7619 View 7/6/2008 2:20:42 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
7620 View 7/6/2008 2:20:53 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00
7621 View 7/6/2008 2:21:06 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00
7622 View 7/6/2008 2:21:30 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $4.00 $0.00
7623 View 7/6/2008 2:21:44 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $8.00 $0.00
7624 View 7/6/2008 2:22:29 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $10.00 $0.00
7625 View 7/6/2008 2:22:53 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $20.00 $0.00
7626 View 7/6/2008 2:23:10 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $25.00 $0.00
7627 View 7/6/2008 2:23:25 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $10.00 $0.00

The hands dealt to me in the final 9, follow.

7619 View 7/6/2008 2:20:42 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $1.00 $0.00
Dealer - - 19
Player hand - 12 (hit) 24 lose

7620 View 7/6/2008 2:20:53 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00

Dealer 19
Player hand - 19 (lose) (in double exposure blackjack you lose if your hand ties with the dealers.)

7621 View 7/6/2008 2:21:06 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $2.00 $0.00

Dealer - 19
Player hand - 13 (hit) get 17 (hit again) get 27

Dealer hand 13 - dealer hits gets a 6- makes total of 19
Player hand - 8 I hit get 18


7623 View 7/6/2008 2:21:44 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $8.00 $0.00

dealer has 19

player has 19 (loss as push is a loss in double exposure.)

7624 View 7/6/2008 2:22:29 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $10.00 $0.00

Dealer has 20

player has 16 - player hits goes bust with 23


7625 View 7/6/2008 2:22:53 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $20.00 $0.00

dealer has 20

player has 13 - player hits gets ace, hits again gets another ace, hits again gets 2, hits again gets another 2, hits a fifth time gets queen and goes bust with 29


7626 View 7/6/2008 2:23:10 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $25.00 $0.00

dealer has 20

player has 19 - player hits goes bust with 22


7627 View 7/6/2008 2:23:25 AM Double Exposure Blackjack $10.00 $0.00

dealer has 19

player has 11 - player hits gets 7 - player hits again goes bust with 28

Remember in double exposure the dealer doesn't have a hidden card, so players make their decision to hit or stand already knowing what cards the dealer has.


However please don't get me wrong. I am not accusing anyone of cheating, and hate to sound like a whining loser, I am posting this as an example of how gambling can catch you out and why you should quit while your ahead, and why you should never never use martingale betting systems.

Will copy and paste more games if you're interested, it is I guess simply the house edge coming into effect.

I don't want to bore you with too many figures and stats as it is a chore to read through them, but will post more if your interested. But surely you need to see play history from many different people to build an accurate picture of fairness.

The microgaming system has been certified as fair by independant auditors, unless they bribe them of course (just kidding)

I think maybe people should be careful about spending too long playing the games though, any games - and should cash out when they've made 20 - 30% profit. I wish I could do this, I havn't enough self-discipline to know when to stop and that is why I fail.

But I have to ask myself, why would someone who is cheating be willing to supply you with your game history? Wouldn't they try to hide this from you, so you couldn't just go and copy and paste it like I just did? I think maybe it was extreme bad luck. Or mathematically speaking shows that random number generators cannot be beaten.
 
Last edited:

Jufo

Dormant Account
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Location
Finland
The thing is that such play data doesn't show anything unusual in itself. Your session ended with losing 9 times in a row and that will happen sooner or later. I estimate 1 in 100 chance of losing 9 hands in a row. This means that it will happen to you on average every 100-200 hands you play. And did you stand on couple of hands when you both had 19? You should hit and hope for Ace or Deuce.

To really show something, you would need to have, say, 10 sessions in a row where this same thing happens to you every time. Only then it might show that there is something off. It is difficult to show bias in these kind of situations, as it would require large number of playing sessions and probably thousands of hands played. And it's not possible to just gather losing sessions from different players because then you would select data by ignoring winning sessions, and this would make the whole thing invalid.

But I have to ask myself, why would someone who is cheating be willing to supply you with your game history? Wouldn't they try to hide this from you, so you couldn't just go and copy and paste it like I just did? I think maybe it was extreme bad luck. Or mathematically speaking shows that random number generators cannot be beaten.

Actually I have had difficulties in receiving my play history in some cases where I have had statistically extremely unlikely results.
 

NASHVEGAS

Banned User - flamming, disrespecting admin,
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Location
MERS
The thing is that such play data doesn't show anything unusual in itself. Your session ended with losing 9 times in a row and that will happen sooner or later. I estimate 1 in 100 chance of losing 9 hands in a row. This means that it will happen to you on average every 100-200 hands you play. And did you stand on couple of hands when you both had 19? You should hit and hope for Ace or Deuce.

To really show something, you would need to have, say, 10 sessions in a row where this same thing happens to you every time. Only then it might show that there is something off. It is difficult to show bias in these kind of situations, as it would require large number of playing sessions and probably thousands of hands played. And it's not possible to just gather losing sessions from different players because then you would select data by ignoring winning sessions, and this would make the whole thing invalid.



Actually I have had difficulties in receiving my play history in some cases where I have had statistically extremely unlikely results.
Too tired to do math or check but I believe 1 in 400+/- (it happens)......lots of other issues I have addressed in the past, even put my money where my mouth is by attempting to obtain an fair independent BJ audit (an oxymoron), have collected numerous amounts of BJ data on 5 of 6 of the most popular software platforms......BJ Tag Words=most data where not at expectataion is skewed always towards the house rather than the player but never by enough standard deviations (2 or more) to be considered anything but fair gaming, in most cases since only skewed the house has the defense of not enough hands played, correlated software (very hard for an auditor to determine even assumming an auditor with backbone which is rare as the corporate world proves) but the strange reoccurences of certain types of streaks for an example that occur skewed in favor of the house rather than player or expectation in the event it can be determined............................... my conclusions=who gives a rat's ass??????
 

funky_seagull

Dormant account
Joined
Jun 1, 2008
Location
scotland
Well I guess someone who keeps losing lots of money playing computerized blackjack would give a rat's arse...

I can supply other play sessions, but have had enough... I am going to take a long break away from online gambling find something more useful to do with my time.

My conclusions:

Don't play at all, the odds are heavily weighted against you; keep your money, save it, do something lasting and worthwhile with it - don't take the bait unless you can be a very clever fish.

Even if it is money you can afford to lose, it is still your money; and unless you have good self-control, money you can afford to lose quickly becomes money you can't afford to lose.
 

NASHVEGAS

Banned User - flamming, disrespecting admin,
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Location
MERS
Well I guess someone who keeps losing lots of money playing computerized blackjack would give a rat's arse...



my conclusions: Don't play at all, keep your money, save it, do something lasting and worthwhile with it... don't take the bait unless you can be a very clever fish.
EXACTLY!!!:thumbsup:....you wanna believe but numbers do not lie,.....as for the rat's arse reference, gaming fairness in importance imo ranks below fast payouts, being paid period, good customer service, and pretty pictures based on the threads I have read or been involved with over the past year and one half......hell gaming fairness might even be passed soon in importance by how winning correlates to what day and/or time of the day you play as well as the amount you deposited.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

bromo98

Dormant account
Joined
Mar 13, 2004
Location
Canada
been there, seen it, got the T-shirt

At last, I can finally respond to one of these threads.

I have been in a position to see, not only the individual player logs (not this specific player - just in general), as well as hundreds of millions of hand results cumulatively.
When you are able to see that view, you'll see the averages, the results, all those ups and downs blend into one beautifully stable number.

There are no switches, no trapdoors, no pedals for those that have are the top of the casino industry (we have all seen too much to believe that there is no one out there who might attempt something). But from the top 4-5 in this industry, you do not have anything to fear - that is in terms of software providers.

One more point. The casino companies that licence the software have 0 access to anything that is of significance to the programming of the software. They have options they can utilize to help manage their casinos (paytables mainly) and these depend on and vary by software manufacturer. They can't affect your results. They can't do anything other than pay or not pay, have good CS or bad, have good marketing or bad, honour bonuses and terms or not.

Ah...that felt good.
Cheers All

bromo
 

Roar

Dormant account
Joined
Jan 30, 2008
Location
Philippines
I have been in a position to see, not only the individual player logs (not this specific player - just in general), as well as hundreds of millions of hand results cumulatively.
When you are able to see that view, you'll see the averages, the results, all those ups and downs blend into one beautifully stable number.

There are no switches, no trapdoors, no pedals for those that have are the top of the casino industry (we have all seen too much to believe that there is no one out there who might attempt something). But from the top 4-5 in this industry, you do not have anything to fear - that is in terms of software providers.

Which begs the question bromo, "Where is the data?"

You rightly point out that being able to access millions of hands will alleviate allegations of rigged or tampered gaming software. So where is it?

Why wouldn't every single Casino (SW provider) break their neck to publish the gaming data in full every single month? What's there to hide?

But none of them do. A normal and prudent thinking person would conclude something was being concealed and that something would not bear close examination.

As a player of both B+M and online Casinos I am left with little doubt the online version is of dubious quality. Whilst I might agree the major SW providers run a relatively clean game there are aspects of their SW that deserve an exacting audited examination.

Outside of the major SW providers players are literally taking their financial life into their own hands.

>
 

wayram

Dormant account
Joined
Sep 13, 2005
Location
Australia
RANDOM SHAMDOM, if the spins were randon as they lead us to believe then it would not matter if you won 10k, you should then take them at their word and continue to play and build it up eventually to 20k, thats why i dont think that the spins are random at all, it is computerised so they can do anything they like, and DO turn the SWITCH. If it was random i should be able to play and get drops not get nothing at all...........Just play smarter and get off if you have a win and go somewhere else then come back a week or so later and see if the switch is back on...
 

Casinomeister

Forum Cheermeister
Staff member
Joined
Jun 30, 1998
Location
Bierland
...As a player of both B+M and online Casinos I am left with little doubt the online version is of dubious quality. Whilst I might agree the major SW providers run a relatively clean game there are aspects of their SW that deserve an exacting audited examination...
William Hill (Crypto), Ladbrokes (MGS), Betfred (Playtech), Virgin Games (Wagerworks) , are either land based casinos/sportbooks, or have enormous tangible enterprises that are at stake if they were caught running crooked software. To assume that these companies have not done due diligence and are not monitoring their gaming software is absurd.

By the way, the Vegas based MGM Grand casino was online a few years ago. They were using Wagerworks as well - which is owed by IGT (International Gaming Technologies) . If you think their games are crooked - well, I'd be willing to bet that they are not.

Hell, even Betfair received the "Queens Award" emblem which it is entitled to do having won a Queen's Award for Enterprise, in the Innovation category, during 2003. A Queen's Award is given (as its name suggests) by the Queen of England, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, and following a full assessment by the Department of Trade and Industry.

I'd be quite surprised that the Dept. of Trade and Industry didn't scrutinize Betfair's software (Chartwell) before giving the thumbs up worthy of the Queen herself. :D

And where are the whistle blowers? For those of us who understand the turbulence of the industry and how people move from one position to the other - (many times with other software providers) - why hasn't someone blown this scandal out of the water? Is it a grand conspiracy, or is there simply no scandal?

In the past ten years of running this site, crooked software problems are rare. When it does happen, it's usually bad programing done by some of the rinky-dink casinos. This is why players need be careful with whom they are dealing with.

Check the "Spot the Rogue" section - if a casino fails to identify what software it uses - move on.

And if you still don't trust the software, then choose to play live games. I don't think live slots are offered though :p
 

GrandMaster

Dormant account
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Location
UK
Hell, even Betfair received the "Queens Award" emblem which it is entitled to do having won a Queen's Award for Enterprise, in the Innovation category, during 2003. A Queen's Award is given (as its name suggests) by the Queen of England, on the recommendation of the Prime Minister, and following a full assessment by the Department of Trade and Industry.

I'd be quite surprised that the Dept. of Trade and Industry didn't scrutinize Betfair's software (Chartwell) before giving the thumbs up worthy of the Queen herself. :D
Well, Mugabe and Ceauşescu both had knighthoods, so the scrutiny is not always as thorough as you might imagine.
 

NASHVEGAS

Banned User - flamming, disrespecting admin,
Joined
Dec 10, 2006
Location
MERS
William Hill (Crypto), Ladbrokes (MGS), Betfred (Playtech), Virgin Games (Wagerworks) , are either land based casinos/sportbooks, or have enormous tangible enterprises that are at stake if they were caught running crooked software. To assume that these companies have not done due diligence and are not monitoring their gaming software is absurd.
I could rebut this statement as many others often have (accountability,transparency,whatever) but it would not matter. If only I understood what a "casino watchdog and player advocate" was. Blame me as I obviously have no clue.......Perhaps the answer lies elsewhere!
 

Casinomeister

Forum Cheermeister
Staff member
Joined
Jun 30, 1998
Location
Bierland
I could rebut this statement as many others often have (accountability,transparency,whatever) but it would not matter. If only I understood what a "casino watchdog and player advocate" was. Blame me as I obviously have no clue.......Perhaps the answer lies elsewhere!
Go ahead and rebut it - no one is stopping you. Show me where William Hill or IGT is conspiring to cheat players using crooked software. Show me that Ladbrokes is cheating their players. Post it here.

"Casino Watchdog and Player Advocate" is a title players have given to Casinomeister - it did not originate from me. If you're hung up on the title - then give it a vote and I'll gladly change it. By the way, I consider this site an information site and an advocate site for both player and industry representatives . It's always been this way.

Perhaps you have forgotten that the forum is only a portion of Casinomeister. There is the Rogue section, Spot the Rogue, FAQ, News, Newsletter, Webcasts, Fight Online Casino Spam, and the Pitch a Bitch section. And the list goes on....

For those of you who only dwell in the forum, you are doing yourselves a huge disservice.

The bottom line is that Casinomeister provides the platform for people to share their thoughts, but it should be done responsibly. You can't just point fingers at some corporation and say that they cheat because you think so. You need to be prepared to provide enough evidence that they do so.

Casinos have the odds in their favor - that's a fact. If you think you are going to beat the house, or come up with some snake oil system that will beat a game of chance, then you should have your head examined and defenestrate your computer.

Lastly, I'm not defending anyone or anything. I am not the "casino apologist". I am pointing out facts or points of view and allowing anyone willing to invest the time to read and understand them to make up their own minds on how to participate in this industry.
 

USA2112

Dormant account
Joined
Oct 8, 2007
Location
USA
To some it may seem there's switches being turned off and on but this is nothing more then the ups and downs when you gamble, sometimes you win and sometimes you lose based on your skill in certain games and luck at other games, "and right place the right time" nothing more nothing less.
 

shadow123

Ueber Meister
MM
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Location
midlands
From my own experiences I think the SWITCH OFF effect is partly self
inflicted due to the feeling of being on a roll and invincible after a decent win.
Dont know about other players but I used to to up the stakes and go for for it
after a hit, doing this makes you more vulnerable when you get the inevitable losing runs that random play can produce.Having said that there are certain
MG games , Hitman and Osbournes for instance that do seem to die after a good drop even on level stakes but this is probably more to do with the games themselves that some switch effecting the whole casino.
 

happygobrokey

Dormant account
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Location
canada
up until last year sometime, weren't there always members who would come in and shoot to shit all the kill switch threads? *i see now a couple chimed in during my following diatribe lol*

if you play 100 into 1000, you have had a remarkably nice run. the fact that you go on to lose it all is easily explainable.

you will have a bad perception of normal, since you just won so many consecutively. a run of cards just as bad as your winning streak is going to seem like a bunch of horse crap to you, but it was a-ok to be winning ten for every one the house does.

and when you got 100 up to 1000 did you continue betting in the same range as when you started with 100? nine losing hands @ $50 is going to dry up your balance faster than when you were winning every hand at the same rate but only @ $5-10 per hand.

you'll always play looser (yes i mean "looser") when you are up considerable money. just always remember how many UNITS at your current bet that you have left, because going minus 15-20 units in blackjack isn't uncommon, especially as online when you're getting hands in at a rate of speed. if you bump up your bet unit, you are more at risk of blowing your stack. go figure...

if you would look at a graph of your balance after each hand, the ups will equal the downs. all you are down is your deposit, everything else washes. you won all that money from the casino, and then you gave it back. that's gambling.

not a plug, but i've found chartwell bj's to be very fair and low variance. they've got single deck and regular rules bj that play very fair imo, although not everyone shares this feeling. and betfair's zero edge bj might make a player more comfortable, because if you play perfect strategy, the only way the house has an edge is if they rig the cards.

oh and the fact that they have infinite bankroll and can afford to take every player's bet until every one of us is broke, so even at a no edge game they still have that advantage. of course the punters have the advantage to pocket a win at any time we choose to stop, but those are the roles we put ourselves in. don't like it, start up your own business and play the other side. tell us if you feel the need to flip a kill switch to pay your rent or even finance that ferrari. i'll bet that non-cheating operations still do quite nicely for themselves, even those on a smaller scale than the likes of virgin or ladbrokes.

start anytime, stop anytime, don't take anything for granted, be reasonable, be cautious, be ready to lose, and appreciate when you win. and quit crying rigged when the negative side of variance hits you.

if it's rigged, a wealthy mathematician gambler would have been able to show it by now. because unless you have a fortune to commit to the project, you can't acquire a large enough sample to prove anything apart from the most obvious of rigs. if it was going to be rigged, it would be so subtle that we definitely could never prove it without billions of hands. and also if they could rig that good, i'm sure we wouldn't be able to just notice it casually, as we all seem to be able to do.

the kind of rigging and kill switches that are described here and in other threads should be easy enough to prove, no? if they are blatantly stacking the deck, shouldn't the numbers support that? have you all got it to a certainty that your real losses are impossibly unlikely?

unlikely. :thumbsup:
 

Jufo

Dormant Account
Joined
Sep 21, 2007
Location
Finland
if you play 100 into 1000, you have had a remarkably nice run. the fact that you go on to lose it all is easily explainable.

Yes but the question is: what if it happens to you every time? Truly random games don't have memory so you should still be able to turn 1000 into 10000 every tenth time assuming zero or very small house edge. The question is: is it possible that there is some mechanism preventing you from winning too much?

oh and the fact that they have infinite bankroll and can afford to take every player's bet until every one of us is broke, so even at a no edge game they still have that advantage. of course the punters have the advantage to pocket a win at any time we choose to stop, but those are the roles we put ourselves in.

No, there cannot be house advantage on zero house edge games. Because the game returns 100% then somebody else wins the whole amount that the others lost.

Here's an idea: Let's construct a database where all players can collectively add their play data. The database would get larger and larger as more playing takes place. Over time this database would show every possible detail of every possible game played. There would be no need to rely on private auditors as players would do the auditing themselves.
 

Alexishot69

Banned User
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Location
Edinburgh
small piece

This is just my opinion on whats quite an entertaining post i think theres absolutely categorically NO random games on the internet wether it be casinos or poker..Infact even RNGs have to be programmed to work by humans so theres no way they can be 100% truly random ..a true story this i was playing a year ago on a site called centrebet at videopoker and had a few drinikies and was sorta what ya could say tilting at video poker and was at one point playing 5 a spin infact too many spins at 5 a spin however to cut a long story short the game froze and when it resumed the max it would allow me to play was 1.25 a spin and lo and behold within a few spins hit 5 of a kind 400 win ..hmmm now i have absolutely no reason in the world to make this up but centrbet was and still is a popular site for sports etc needless to say after the win amazingly i could up my bet huh i didnt and withdrew my cash which i have to say was only 50% of what i deposited ..so the point is its all programmed technology and will ALWAYS like land based slots payout when theyre ready too and CAN be manipulated to pay less..

Lets take poker for example yes i believe its random of that i have no doubts..however what i do believe is that there is millions of hands already programmed in and they come out randomly ..this is just my opinion but i do know for a fact that slots can be made to payput at whatever % the owners seem fit to set them at so why woul dthey not do this online? prima poker sends yearly its logs to auditors who are pricewaterhousecoopers whos to say they senf exact play logs?? i questioned prima one night regarding sitting multi-tabling and hit the exact same hole cards on 4 tables at the one time ..odds on that happening are??? to have this repeated several times then shows theres something just not quite right and its happened on other sites also not just prima....

Companies have as most people poin out reputations to keep but lets face it when a lot of is flashed in someones eyes 99/100 they will snap it up its human nature ..
 
Top