|
|||
|
|||||||
| Register | All Albums | Member Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Mark Forums Read | |||
| Main Site | CM Casinos | CM Poker | I-Gaming Forum Reps | Rogue Pit | Webcast | Bitchin' Newsletter | News |
| Notices |
| Online Casinos Online Casinos - Information, Experiences, questions and such. This is no place for ads or cloaked promos. Shills and spammers be warned |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
||||
|
Which Bonus would you choose?
Bonus#1- 200% match ($100 max bonus). Wager $2500 (slots). After wagering is done, you can only cashout if you have a balance of more than depost+bonus(would be $150).
Bonus#2- 100% mach ($125 max bonus). Wager 25x bonus($3125 slots). No balance requirements to cashout after wagering done. Which is the better bonus? PS- Casino is This is Vegas (Rival)
__________________
paul02085 |
| The Following User Says Thank You to RobWin For This Useful Post: | ||
paul02085 (8th March 2008) | ||
|
||||
|
The first bonus gives less risk for your own money. However after 2500$ on slots play, you most likely won't be able to withdraw. But you can of course try to increase your balance back to 150$ on Roulette for example, and then you will be able to withdraw deposit + bonus.
UPDATE: I calculated that you are expected to lose 100$ on the first bonus and 125$ on the second. So neither bonus does give you an edge. |
|
|||||
|
Neither lol
I would rather pay my way and get out whenever I want
__________________
Don't get what you want, Want what you get |
|
|||||
|
Ditto on Babs7262 reply...
![]() Rather have the option of cashing out anytime I want...without being shackled to a certain amount of play...
__________________
Today is the Tomorrow, you thought about Yesterday...so live as IT IS your last tomorrow! |
|
|||||
|
I agree with RobWin - number 1 because you are risking less of your own money.
Quote:
Of course you can work out the theoretical EV based on 5% edge, the same as you would with say 0.5% blackjack. But the variance of slots is massive compared to cards or even roulette & the chances of getting even remotely close to 5% during this WR are pretty much zilch. The probability is your return will be much less than 95% and you will bust out. But you only need one or two decent hits and it will be a totally different story... I know; I've been there, done that - many times!
__________________
KK: Reputable casinos turn rogue overnight! See Kasino News. Casinos: New ~ 15 Rivals ~ OK for USA. SB: Slots Stats & Facts: GV, WW, 3Dice, Rival, Wizard. |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to KasinoKing For This Useful Post: | ||
dirtydealin (9th March 2008), RobWin (8th March 2008) | ||
|
|||||
|
Find another bonus...its way to risky
__________________
GamblersIllustrated.com - dutch, german and english support |
|
||||
|
Quote:
For this 200% bonus that was presented in the first post, the best solution would be to bet the whole bankroll on Roulette and hope to double up your balance, then with starting balance of 300$ play the required WR through on slots. This gives you the highest chance of winning. However if playing Roulette with bonus money is forbidden, you could also bet the whole bankroll on single spin on slots, and if you win, then play through the WR with small bets. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
__________________
KK: Reputable casinos turn rogue overnight! See Kasino News. Casinos: New ~ 15 Rivals ~ OK for USA. SB: Slots Stats & Facts: GV, WW, 3Dice, Rival, Wizard. |
|
|||||
|
That would never work for KK..........he needs a bit more time in autoplay!
__________________
Two blondes froze to death at the drive-in movie. They went to see Closed for Winter.
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| William Hill ....bunch of weirdos | hobobiker | Online Casinos | 7 | 11th June 2007 12:24 AM |
| $500 Bonus at Winward Not Credited | aka23 | Casino Complaints - Bonus Issues | 4 | 2nd October 2006 07:58 PM |