Big Win at Casino Tropez

[lojo]

Please don't sweat it Jazriel, sometimes a new poster gets a 'babtism by fire' We do see alot of shill and spam so some users are wary and suspicious, they are just trying to 'self-police' the forum; as a fellow member you can look at it as they are looking out for you too now

You don't have to prove anything to anyone. Don't let it put you off. You are welcome here

[RedArmy]

dont go there! we can all post payouts, its not the correct practice on this forum.
It's not the point whether the player is genuine or not. We cant really prove that. Just enjoy the storytelling and be happy for one another. We must all ensure that accredited online casinos get the credit they deserve. enough said

With Regards,

RedArmy

[loganberry]

Originally Posted by lojo
Looks authentic to me, Jazriel seems genuinely excited (and I would be too!) .

Originally Posted by Tristan727
Really? Can you provide therefore, an example, of a faked review & how they differ? My point being is that this one rings in my head, very very hollow. Im not saying one shouldn't give glowing reviews here - far from it....but to post such unquestioning slavish praise, without having ever strung a paragraph together here previously - is very suspicious...

I'm going to wade in here with my 2c worth and if you listen carefully you will be able to hear me SCREAM!

The amount of doubt and disbelief which newbie posters are subjected to never fails to astonish me. In this instance Jazriel is being criticised for posting a positive encounter with a casino, and for never 'having never strung a paragraph together here previously - it is very suspicious....'. Excuse me, but where does it say in the rules that a first time poster is only allowed to add lame comments (with apologies to Littlebit ) to other people's posts, before beginning their own thread?

And what exactly is meant by a 'more balanced review'? Could we have that rule applied immediately to the Casino Complaints section, please? Initial posts there are not balanced (the word 'Complaints' says it all! ) but they reflect the poster's experiences, and as such are very valid. Ditto Jazriel's post.

When I first joined this forum, one of the first things I noticed was how newbies got a hammering from some of the established posters who seem to feel they own this forum. And this is not just my imagination - take the time to go back over some of the posts and you can see this disburbing trend quite clearly.

If CasinoMeister Land is to continue to be held in high regard in the gaming community, then I suggest you extend that same regard to newbies who are trying to share their experiences, rather than mock them and shoot them down. Give them the benefit of the doubt. And who knows, they may also turn into valued contributors. At the moment, with some of the attitudes shown in this thread, you run the risk of losing them completely.

And here endeth the lesson!

[SlotMonster]

dont go there! we can all post payouts, its not the correct practice on this forum.
It's not the point whether the player is genuine or not. We cant really prove that. Just enjoy the storytelling and be happy for one another. We must all ensure that accredited online casinos get the credit they deserve. enough said

With Regards,

RedArmy

Agree with all points!

[BingoT]

If it's true it's true.
Why would anyone want attention like this?
congradutions to you if you did hit it.
It might smell like roses Or your here to give that place a good name and you got paid for it lol
Some people are just jjoulous of you lol
Great Story on the top.

[loganberry]

Originally posted by Jazriel
I since rethought my strategy, and started playing Diamond Valley at $5 a spin. AWESOME game, good wins, and now I can actually get my account up enough to cashout.

Agreed! I am now waiting for a cashout of £7k from COTP, due entirely to that game. Am luving it! luving it! luving it!

I used to play big money on some games, and still do, but this game at £5 per spin has been better to me than any other than I can remember.

So from being an MG afficionado, I am now veering towards Playtech in a big, big way.

[SlotMonster]

I'm going to wade in here with my 2c worth and if you listen carefully you will be able to hear me SCREAM!

The amount of doubt and disbelief which newbie posters are subjected to never fails to astonish me. In this instance Jazriel is being criticised for posting a positive encounter with a casino, and for never 'having never strung a paragraph together here previously - it is very suspicious....'. Excuse me, but where does it say in the rules that a first time poster is only allowed to add lame comments (with apologies to Littlebit ) to other people's posts, before beginning their own thread?

And what exactly is meant by a 'more balanced review'? Could we have that rule applied immediately to the Casino Complaints section, please? Initial posts there are not balanced (the word 'Complaints' says it all! ) but they reflect the poster's experiences, and as such are very valid. Ditto Jazriel's post.

When I first joined this forum, one of the first things I noticed was how newbies got a hammering from some of the established posters who seem to feel they own this forum. And this is not just my imagination - take the time to go back over some of the posts and you can see this disburbing trend quite clearly.

If CasinoMeister Land is to continue to be held in high regard in the gaming community, then I suggest you extend that same regard to newbies who are trying to share their experiences, rather than mock them and shoot them down. Give them the benefit of the doubt. And who know, they may also turn into valued contributors. At the moment, with some of the attitudes shown in this thread, you run the risk of losing them completely.

And here endeth the lesson!.

Thanks for this post! x 5...no...x 50 or even x 500 times!!!!
Keep it in your mind, members! And newbies are still welcome!

[jenn1381]

Congrats on your wins and cashouts, Jazriel! I am glad you were paid and are happy with your experience! That is most important.

And c'mon guys.... Yes, we get a lot of newbie shills, and it is sometimes hard to tell the difference.. but what ever happened to innocent until proven guilty? I understand that we can hardly prove anything, but holy cow, let's not scare away all the newbies who might actually have something worthwhile to say or share. We're right to be suspicious but we aren't right to blast the person down just because we are suspicious. All you need to do is watch as the person posts more or go back and read old posts - eventually the truth ALWAYS comes out, as we've seen time and time again - no one can hide for long!

A forum is meant to be a community and it's not going to be one if we stick to the regular group. Everyone needs to be welcomed and time will tell whether or not they will become a viable part of the forum or if they have a hidden agenda.

[me_and_ed]

Regardless of this casino group being rogued or not they have always paid me, 3 different casino's from this group at least 5 withdrawls over 3k , anyway if the stupid a**hole shillers didn't ruin it for the legitimate posters we wouldnt be so critical.

[lojo]

Regardless of this casino group being rogued or not they have always paid me, 3 different casino's from this group at least 5 withdrawls over 3k , anyway if the stupid a**hole shillers didn't ruin it for the legitimate posters we wouldnt be so critical.

I agree, I've been wary before and even accused a stand-up guy of spamming once.
I don't get it about them ever being rogued though, my search skills must be messed up... (or my comprehension)